Effect of the Community-based SIMS Programme on Preschool Children's Oral Hygiene Level: A Cluster Randomised Control Trial
Effect of the Community-based SIMS Programme on Preschool Children's Oral Hygiene Level: A Cluster Randomised Control Trial
This is a cluster randomised control trial targeting 5-6-year-old children and their parents in Kampar district, Perak, Malaysia for a period of 6 months. In total, 28 preschools are randomly assigned into intervention and control group (14 preschools per group). Sample size for each group is 317 children. The intervention group receives the SIMS programme (SIMSP) which is an improved version of the usual care, while the control group receives the usual care. Usual care in defined as the existing preschool oral health programme (POHP) offered by the Ministry of Health. The SIMSP is formulated based on the recommendations from the National Oral Health Survey of Preschool Children's (2015) report. It comprises active participation of dental therapists (DT), parents and class teachers in children's oral health. The concept of the SIMSP is that improvement in oral health behaviours and oral hygiene of preschool children would result in improvement of gingival health and caries level in their permanent teeth in the long term. On the other hand, the control group involves DT visiting preschools twice a year without parental nor teachers active involvement. The scientific hypothesis of the study is that the SIMSP is more effective to improve oral hygiene level of preschool children than the POHP over 6 months. The primary objective of the study is to assess the effect of the SIMSP versus the POHP in improving oral hygiene level among 5-6-year-old children over 6 months. The secondary objectives are to assess the changes in oral health behaviours among the children and oral health literacy among parents over 6 months.
Study Design:
This is a cluster randomised controlled trial. The overall duration of the study is 9 months and the duration of the intervention is 6 months. The reporting of this study is done in accordance with the SPIRIT 2013 guidance for protocols of clinical trials and the CONSORT checklist.
Study setting:
The study involves government-funded preschools that receive the POHP in Kampar district, Perak, Malaysia. Based on this criteria, 53 preschools in Kampar district are eligible to be included in the study.
Randomisation:
The 53 preschools are paired according to geographical location and preschool characteristics into 24 pairs (5 preschools are not paired). Of the 24 pairs, 14 pairs are randomly selected using computer generated table. Subsequently, 2 preschools in each pair is randomly assigned to intervention and control group each using computer generated table.
Sample recruitment:
The study sample consists of 5-6-year-old preschool children from the 24 preschools and their parents. A written informed consent is obtained from parents and verbal agreement is obtained from children prior to the start of the study.
Sample size calculation:
Sample size calculation is based on the potential effect of the SIMSP to exert a small effect size dz = 0.30, α = 0.05, power = 0.8 on children's plaque score (primary outcome measure) and parental oral health literacy (OHL - secondary outcome measure) than the POHP over 6 months. Using G*Power version 3.1.9.2 software, the total number of sample is n = 352 (176 per group). Sample size calculation is also done based on the effect of the SIMSP to produce a 10% improvement (α = 0.05, power = 0.8) in child's oral health behaviours (OHB) than the POHP after 6 months. Using Power and Sample Size Calculation version 3.1.2 software, the total number of sample was n = 348 (174 per group). The highest total sample size (n = 352) is increased by 20% to account for non-respondents and multiplied by a design effect of 1.5 to produce final sample size, n = [352 + (352*0.2)] x 1.5 = 634 (317 per group).
Intervention:
The SIMSP, which refers to 'Program Senyuman Indah Milik Semua' in Malay, or 'The Beautiful Smile for All Programme' in English, consists of 3 components conducted by a dedicated team of DT (4 persons), parents, and preschool teachers. The target groups are preschool children and their parents/guardians. The content of the SIMSP is as follows:
Preschool children:
Parents/guardians:
Control:
Oral examination by DT, oral health education (OHE), and fluoride varnish application twice/year (usual care/POHP).
Conduct of the study:
(A) Prior to intervention - development of the Oral Health Education booklet for teacher, training of teachers on its use, and development of oral health infographics for parents.
(B) Delivery of the intervention - the intervention is delivered in 3 phases;
Phase 1:
It involves an oral examination (including plaque assessment) of children in both groups by DT. On the same visit, a self-administered questionnaire is sent to parents through class teacher and collected after 1 week. Data in Phase 1 are baseline data for the study.
Phase 2:
This phase takes place 2 weeks after Phase 1. In the SIMSP, DT deliver OHE to children and apply fluoride varnish (20,000 ppmF) on their teeth. DT meet up with parents to discuss on child's CRA and provide OHE and diet counselling to parents according to their child's caries risk levels (low/medium/high). A set of free toothbrush and fluoride toothpaste (1000ppm fluoride) is distributed to parents for child's home use along with instructions on toothbrushing. Parents also receive 10 oral health infographics sent by DT via WhatsApp every 2 weeks for the next 5 months. Teachers are provided with the OHE booklet which contains 11 topics (and worksheets) to be used as a teaching aid to teach oral health lessons in class. Teachers are required to deliver 1 topic lesson every 2 weeks until all the 11 topics are delivered over 6 months. Teachers are also given enough supplies of toothbrush and fluoride toothpaste for children's tooth brushing after morning break at school over 6 months. Teachers are given a tooth model and instructions on toothbrushing by DT. In the control group, DT deliver OHE to children and apply fluoride varnish (20,000 ppmF) on their teeth.
Phase 3:
This phase takes place 24 weeks after Phase 2. In this phase, DT carry out restorative treatment on children using glass inomer cements followed by second application of fluoride varnish. This is carried out in both groups. The 6-month follow up for oral examination on children and parental questionnaire are carried out within 2 weeks after completion of Phase 3.
Monitoring the intervention:
The intervention is monitored by means of an activity book to be completed by DT, parents, and teachers, respectively throughout the 6 months. DT will tick off all activities that have been carried out at preschool in the 3 phases over the duration of 6 months. Accordingly, teachers will tick off the scheduled class lessons and daily toothbrushing activities. Parents will tick off the daily toothbrushing supervision of their children before bedtime. The activity books are reviewed periodically to assess for compliance. In terms of oral examination and parental questionnaire, those who are lost to follow up will not be replaced. Analysis will be by intention to treat.
Study tools:
Blinding:
This study uses a single-blinding strategy where the examiners who examine the children at baseline and 6-month follow up are blinded to the intervention group.
Calibration of examiners:
3 dental officers undergo calibration and standardisation on the use of ICDAS and Oral Cleanliness Index with a paediatric dentist. Calibration and standardisation are carried out at the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya and again in field condition at one of the preschools not involved in the study. Inter- and intra-examiner reliability are assessed for both ICDAS and plaque score charting. Kappa score is used to assess agreement between and within examiners. For ICDAS, the inter-examiner Kappa scores ranged from 0.72-0.80 and the intra-examiner scores ranged from 0.70-0.84. For plaque scores, the inter-examiner Kappa scores ranged from 0.72-.80 and the intra-examiner scores ranged from 0.77-0.94.
Data management:
Data are checked after completion of oral examinations and after receiving the questionnaires. For any missing data, the child will be re-examined or the parents will be contacted again. Raw data are entered into Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 24.
Qualitative data collection:
Focus group discussions (FGD) with DT and preschool teachers are conducted separately to explore their perspectives on the process implementation of the SIMSP according to their roles and responsibilities. A topic guide with open-ended questions are developed and use in the FGD to get feedback on the appropriateness, feasibility (facilitators and barriers), effectiveness, and recommendations for improvement on the SIMSP.
Statistical Analysis:
Data analysis is conducted using SPSS version 24 software, and Qualitative Data Analysis Software (NVivo) version 11 software.
Descriptive Analysis:
The frequency distribution, a measure of central tendency and dispersion are carried out. Continuous data are presented in mean and standard deviation (or median and interquartile range) based on the normality of the data. Categorical data are presented in frequency and percentages. The demographics of the sample are analysed using descriptive statistics.
Effectiveness Analysis:
Intention to Treat (ITT) analysis will be applied to measure the effect of the SIMSP on the primary and secondary outcome measures over and above that by the usual care. Pearson Chi Square test is used to assess differences in the proportion of children with plaque between groups at baseline and after 6 months. Independent sample T-test is used to assess the difference in mean decrement plaque scores after 6 months between groups, and Paired sample T-test was used to assess within-group changes. Effect size of the SIMSP is calculated. Similar statistical tests are used to assess the differences in parental OHL between the groups after 6 months. For children's OHB, Pearson Chi Square test is used to assess differences in children's OHB between groups at baseline and after 6 months, while McNemar test is used for within-group changes in proportions.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: