Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To verify the efficacy of manikins with feedback in the training of physicians and nurses in the courses of Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) authorized by the American Heart Association (AHA) when compared to the traditional training form.
Introduction: The Cardiopulmonary Arrest (CRP) is the largest medical emergency, training is fundamental for a good performance in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). In a realistic simulation scenario, the results tend to improve with the use of feedback manikins that evaluate the quality parameters in CPR and show in real time what the rescuer needs to improve in order to be successful in training and increase the probability of success in future real care. Objective: To verify the efficacy of the manikins with feedback in the training of physicians and nurses in the courses of Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) authorized by the American Heart Association (AHA). Methods: Comparison of CPR performance of ACLS students. The intervention group will be submitted to the real-time feedback of the manikins, the control group will receive feedback from the instructor. Statistical analysis will consist of inter-group comparisons and will cover mean, standard deviation, and parametric tests such as Student's T test. The results will be related to the characteristics of the sample, including anthropometric profile, profession, training time, practice area, previous training with a focus on CPR and physical exercise practice.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental |
| |
| Control | No Intervention |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feedback mannequim | Device | The intervention group received rcp training with their performance being evaluated in real time so that they could correct themselves |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The feedback mannequim is as effective as an AHA instructor | 6 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria: Be an ACLS student and sign the TCLE. -
Exclusion Criteria: Refusing to sign the TCLE
-
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Juarez Dr Neuhaus Barbisan | Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul - Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia | Porto Alegre | Rio Grande do Sul | 90040-370 | Brazil |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24746785 | Background | Nolan JP, Soar J, Smith GB, Gwinnutt C, Parrott F, Power S, Harrison DA, Nixon E, Rowan K; National Cardiac Arrest Audit. Incidence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom National Cardiac Arrest Audit. Resuscitation. 2014 Aug;85(8):987-92. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 15. | |
| 29084067 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Simulation-based learning in continuing medical education: analysis of student and teacher perceptions of a Hospital in Rio de Janeiro | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Austin AL, Spalding CN, Landa KN, Myer BR, Cure D, Smith JE, Platt G, King HC. A Randomized Control Trial of Cardiopulmonary Feedback Devices and Their Impact on Infant Chest Compression Quality: A Simulation Study. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 Feb;36(2):e79-e84. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001312. |
| 26472995 | Background | Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, Halperin HR, Hess EP, Moitra VK, Neumar RW, O'Neil BJ, Paxton JH, Silvers SM, White RD, Yannopoulos D, Donnino MW. Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S444-64. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000261. No abstract available. |
| 27509064 | Background | Choi B, Asselin N, Pettit CC, Dannecker M, Machan JT, Merck DL, Merck LH, Suner S, Williams KA, Jay GD, Kobayashi L. Simulation-based Randomized Comparative Assessment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Bundle Completion by Emergency Medical Service Teams Using Standard Life Support or an Experimental Automation-assisted Approach. Simul Healthc. 2016 Dec;11(6):365-375. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000178. |
| 29297195 | Background | Iskrzycki L, Smereka J, Rodriguez-Nunez A, Barcala Furelos R, Abelarias Gomez C, Kaminska H, Wieczorek W, Szarpak L, Nadolny K, Galazkowski R, Ruetzler K, Ladny JR. The impact of the use of a CPRMeter monitor on quality of chest compressions: a prospective randomised trial, cross-simulation. Kardiol Pol. 2018;76(3):574-579. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2017.0255. Epub 2018 Jan 3. |
| 24361457 | Background | Kirkbright S, Finn J, Tohira H, Bremner A, Jacobs I, Celenza A. Audiovisual feedback device use by health care professionals during CPR: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised trials. Resuscitation. 2014 Apr;85(4):460-71. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.12.012. Epub 2013 Dec 21. |