Telemedicine Versus Standard Care for First Trimester Abortion in South Africa: a Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial
Telemedicine Versus Standard Care for First Trimester Abortion in South Africa: a Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial
The study aim to determine if medical abortion facilitated by a physician online (s.c. telemedicine), combined with a simplified physical exam, is equally effective, safe and acceptable to women in South Africa as standard medical abortion care.
The proposed study is non-inferiority randomized controlled trial that will investigate the safety, effectiveness and acceptability for women of early medical abortion performed through telemedicine, compared to standard care in South Africa. Standard care, in the Western Cape, includes face to face eligibility screening, counselling and information with a nurse or physician, as well as an ultrasound to confirm the gestational age of the pelvic exam. The intervention will include a pelvic exam and gestatonal age based on LMP assessment and uterine size by bimanual palpation. Eligibility screening, counselling and information will occur through an existing online telemedicine application, content and language-adapted to suit women in South Africa, and managed by a HPCSA certified doctor. The study is a non-inferiority study. Our hypothesis is that the intervention is not inferior to standard care with respect to safety, effectiveness and acceptability. The study is performed to provide an alternate model of abortion care to be applied in settings where abortion is in any way restricted and increase access to safe abortion. Importantly the study is planned for a context where abortion services are legal but restricted by stigma. South Africa therefore provides a uniquely suited setting for this study.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
deborah.constant@uct.ac.za+27722527415
margit.endler@gmail.com+27646176477
Bellville, Western Cape 7530, South Africa
deborah.constant@uct.ac.za+27722527415