Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Randomized prospective study assessing suction drainage in total hip arthroplasty. Group without drainage, 50 hips, compared with group with suction drainage, 50 hips. Both groups will be asses clinically (ROM scale, VAS), laboratory and radiology (USG). In the actually literature there are no benefits using closed suction drainage after primary total hip arthroplasty.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| suction drainage | Active Comparator | Patients will be dived with randomization in to two groups: with and without closed suction drainage after primary total hip arthroplasty |
|
| no suction drainage | Active Comparator | Patients will be dived with randomization in to two groups: with and without closed suction drainage after primary total hip arthroplasty |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| suction drainage | Procedure | After primary total hip arthroplasty closed suction drainage will be used. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hip hematoma size in USG | Size in millimeters fluid collection in supine position above femoral neck. | 3 days after surgery |
| Hemoglobin levels | Hb levels after surgery, difference between two groups | 3 days after surgery |
| C-reactive protein levels | C-reactive protein levels after surgery, difference between two groups | 3 days after surgery |
| Visual Analog Scale punctation | Pain level after surgery in Visual Analog Scale scale 0-10 pts. where 0-no pain, 10-most painful. | 3 day after surgery |
| Hip range of movement | Differences between hip ROM after surgery | 3 days after surgery |
| Wound exudation | Assessing wound dehiscence after surgery, 1-exudation appear, 0-dry dressing | 3 days after surgery |
| Soft tissue hematoma | USG hematoma appearance in soft tissue around the hip | 3 days after surgery |
| Intraoperative bleeding | All amount of blood loss intraoperative with hidden bleeding, with use of Gross formula. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Infection | Superficial or deep infection after surgery | 30 days after surgery |
| Deep vein thrombosis | Occurrence lower limb thrombosis after surgery |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Pawel Bartosz | Prof. A. Gruca Teaching Hospital in Otwock | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34389016 | Derived | Bartosz P, Marczynski W, Para M, Kogut M, Bialecki J. Comparative study of suction drainage placement in cementless hip replacement among patients undergoing extended thromboprophylaxis: a prospective randomized study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Aug 13;22(1):688. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04583-0. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013396 | Suction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004322 | Drainage |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
Two groups of patients with or without closed suction drainage after primary total hip arthroplasty.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| no suction drainage | Procedure | After primary total hip arthroplasty closed suction drainage won't be used. |
|
| 1 day |
| Blood transfusion | Need of blood transfusion after operation | 14 days after surgery |
| 30 days after surgery |
| Readmission | Need to readmission after surgery | 30 days after surgery |