Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Belgrade | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study will aim to compare two modalities in the reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis defects. More specifically, the control group will be a reconstructive approach (xenograft bone graft granules and collagen membrane, BioOss and BioGide, Geistlich, Wolhusen). The test group will be the same, with the exception of an autologous sub-epithelial connective tissue palatal graft, sutured beneath the flap, which will be used in addition to grafting materials.
Outcomes will include CAL, PD, MR, defect resolution, PI, BoP, SUPP, surgical characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measures, including an aesthetic self-evaluation.
The study will aim to compare two modalities in the reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis defects.
More specifically, the control group will be a "pure" reconstructive approach (xenograft bone graft granules and resorbable collagen membrane, BioOss and BioGide, Geistlich, Wolhusen). This is in accordance with gold standard practices of reconstructive therapy of peri-implant defects.
The test group will be treated with the same approach and materials, with the exception of an autologous sub-epithelial connective tissue palatal graft, sutured beneath the flap, which will be used in addition to the grafting materials. The graft will be harvested from the homolateral palate (molar region).
Outcomes will include clinical attachment level (CAL; primary outcome), probing depth (PD), mucosal recession (MR), defect resolution (a composite outcome defined as the simultaneous absence of PD > 5 mm, bleeding on probing [BOP] and/or suppuration [SUP], and bone level changes > 0.5 mm), plaque index (PI), BOP, suppuration on probing, suppuration on palpation, surgical duration, the Early Wound Healing Index (EHI), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including aesthetic self-evaluation.
PROMs will assess patients' perception of surgery, pain intensity, perceived swelling, perceived bleeding, and analgesic intake.
Clinical measurements will be recorded at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. EHI will be assessed at 1 and 2 weeks postoperatively. Radiographic bone levels at 12 and 24 months will be compared with those recorded on radiographs obtained at baseline. All PROMs variables, as well as aesthetic self-evaluation, will be collected using specially designed questionnaires completed by the patients. PROMs data will be recorded at 4, 8, and 12 hours after surgery on the day of surgery (day 0), and daily from postoperative day 2 to day 7. Aesthetic self-evaluation will be recorded at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xenograft+collagen membrane | Active Comparator | Reconstructive approach (Xenograft+collegen membrane) |
|
| Xenograft+collagen membrane+autologous soft tissue graft | Experimental | Reconstructive approach (Xenograft+collegen membrane) plus soft tissue graft (autologous, harvested as FGG) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peri-implantitis reconstructive surgery | Procedure | For both arms (excluding the already included information): defect debridement, removal of debris using titanium curettes, titanium brushes on the implant surface, irrigation with saline, application of sterile cotton pellets with saline solution. Grafting with (experimental) xenograft and soft tissue, or xenograft alone (control). Suture. Specific to control group (active comparator): the peri-implant defect will be filled with xenograft, and a collagen membrane will be fitted and trimmed to the defect area. Specific to test/experimental group: same as above (for control). In addition a soft tissue graft will be harvested from the palate and sutured to the buccal flap. The entire flap will then be sutured to the lingual flap. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical attachment level | linear distance (mm) from the implant platform to the bottom of the pocket | change from baseline to: 6, 12, 18, 24 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Probing depth | linear distance (mm) from the gingival margin to the bottom of the pocket | 6, 12, 18, 24 months |
| Disease resolution | No PD greater than or equal to 5 mm and simultaneous absence of BOP/SUP and no more than 0.5 mm change between 2 weeks and 12 and 24 months on radiograph |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
· Be able and willing to provide consent and sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Luca Cordaro, MD, PhD | G. Eastman Dental Hospital Rome, Italy | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George Eastman Dental Hospital | Roma | 00100 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41618697 | Derived | Holtzman LP, Milinkovic I, Vuckovic M, Malpassi C, Cuppini M, Solderer A, Aleksic Z, Cordaro L. Effect of Connective Tissue Graft as an Adjunct to Guided Bone Regeneration in the Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A Dual-Center Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2026 Apr;37(4):478-495. doi: 10.1111/clr.70093. Epub 2026 Jan 31. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D057873 | Peri-Implantitis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010510 | Periodontal Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 6, 12, 18, 24 months |
| Mucosal recession | linear distance (mm) from the implant platform to the gingival margin | 6, 12, 18, 24 months |
| plaque index (minimum value 0, maximum 1) | binary outcome: yes/ no detected running the probe into the peri-implant sulcus | 6, 12, 18, 24 months |
| profuse bleeding | abundant bleeding evoked upon probing immediately after | 6, 12, 18, 24 months |
| BOP | bleeding upon probing: bleeding evoked upon probing after 1 second | 6, 12, 18, 24 months |
| suppuration | Binary: yes or no, detected upon probing or digital palpation | 6, 12, 18, 24 months |
| Gingival thickness | Measured in a horizontal direction at 1 mm from the gingival margin | 6, 12, 18, 24 months |
| PROMs - Patient perception of surgery | Assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate a more positive perception of the surgical procedure. | 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and Days 2-7 after surgery |
| Radiographic bone levels | radiographic bone level changes between the 2 week and 12 and 24 month follow-ups | 2 weeks, 12 months, 24 months |
| PROMs - Patient-reported pain intensity | Assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. | 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and Days 2-7 after surgery |
| PROMs - Patient-reported swelling | Assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater perceived swelling. | 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and Days 2-7 after surgery |
| PROMs - Patient-reported bleeding | Assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater perceived bleeding. | 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and Days 2-7 after surgery |
| PROMs - Analgesic consumption | Number of analgesic tablets consumed by the patient during the first postoperative week. | 12 hours after surgery and daily from day 2 through day 7 after surgery |
| PROMs - aesthetic self-evaluation | Assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the esthetic outcome. | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months |
| Early wound healing | Wound healing scores ranging from 1 to 5 by the surgeon | 1 week and 2 weeks after surgery |
| Surgical duration | The interval between the initial incision and placement of the final suture, measured in minutes. | at the surgery |