Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase 3 clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC in participants with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). 691 participants were randomized to one of the following treatment arms in a 2:1 ratio, fruquintinib plus BSC or placebo plus BSC.
This is a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase 3 clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in combination with BSC versus placebo in combination with BSC in metastatic colorectal cancer participants who have progressed on, or were intolerant to, chemotherapy, anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR biologics, and TAS-102 or regorafenib. Participants with MSI-H/MMR deficient tumors must have also received an immune checkpoint inhibitor if approved and available and if deemed appropriate. Subjects with BRAF-mutant tumors must have been treated with a BRAF inhibitor if approved and available and if deemed appropriate.
Metastatic colorectal cancer cannot be cured by surgery. Therefore, treatment principals are primarily aimed at controlling disease progression and prolonging survival. Standard first- and second-line therapy includes cytotoxic drugs such as 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan; anti-VEGF therapy; and, if RAS wild type, anti-EGFR therapy. After the first two lines of chemotherapy, standard third-line treatment is either TAS-102 or regorafenib. There are currently no effective treatments for patients who have progressed on standard, approved therapies, and treatment options include reuse of prior therapies, clinical trials or BSC. Consequently, there is an unmet medical need for additional safe and effective treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fruquintinib Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Group | Experimental | Participants will be orally administered Fruquintinib 5 mg in combination with BSC once daily for 3 weeks of continuous dosing followed by a 1-week break (with each cycle length of 28 days). |
|
| Placebo Plus BSC Group | Placebo Comparator | Participants will be orally administered Placebo 5 mg in combination with BSC once daily for 3 weeks of continuous dosing followed by a 1-week break (with each cycle length of 28 days). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fruquintinib | Drug | Oral VEGFR inhibitor |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival (OS) | OS was defined as the time (months) from date of randomization to death from any cause. OS was calculated as (date of death or last known alive - date of randomization + 1)/30.4375. Participants without report of death at the time of analysis will be censored at the date last known alive. | From date of randomization to death from any cause (up to 22 months) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Progression Free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Investigator Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 | PFS was defined as the time (months) from randomization until the first radiographic documentation of objective progression as assessed by investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever comes first. More specifically, PFS was determined using all data until the last evaluable visit prior to or on the date of: (i) radiographic disease progression (PD) per RECIST v1.1; (ii) withdrawal of consent to obtain additional scans on study; or (iii) initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy other than the study drugs, whichever was earlier. PD was defined as: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline; an absolute increase of at least 5 mm in the sum of diameters of target lesions; and the appearance of one or more new lesions. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| William Schelman, MD, PhD | HUTCHMED International Corporation | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayo Clinic Arizona | Phoenix | Arizona | 85054 | United States | ||
| Arizona Oncology Associates, PC-HOPE |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40888992 | Derived | Kotani D, Yoshino T, Masuishi T, Sunakawa Y, Takashima A, Yamazaki K, Kawakami H, Nishina T, Komatsu Y, Esaki T, Eng C, Ukrainskyj S, Pallai R, Nanda S, Yang Z, Schelman W, Kania M, Satoh T. Efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a FRESCO-2 subgroup analysis of patients enrolled in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Oct;30(10):2043-2052. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02852-9. Epub 2025 Sep 1. | |
| 40485075 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 691 participants were randomized and enrolled in this study.
The study was conducted at 124 study sites in the United States, Europe region, Japan, and Australia.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Fruquintinib + Best Supportive Care (BSC) Group | Participants received 5 milligrams (mg) of fruquintinib oral capsule in combination with BSC once daily for 3 weeks of continuous dosing followed by a 1-week break during a treatment cycle (Each cycle length was 28 days). |
| FG001 | Placebo + BSC Group |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 21, 2022 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo capsule |
|
| From randomization until the first documentation of objective progression or death, whichever comes first (up to 22 months) |
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) | ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best overall response of confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), per RECIST v1.1, as determined by the investigator. PR: At least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (<)10 millimeters (mm). | From randomization until the first documentation of best overall response (up to 22 months) |
| Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) | DCR was defined as percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) (for at least 7 weeks) per RECIST v1.1, as determined by the investigator. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum on study. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (nadir), including baseline. | From randomization until the first documentation of best overall response (up to 22 months) |
| Duration of Response (DOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) | DOR was defined as the time (in months) from the first occurrence of PR or CR by RECIST Version 1.1, until the first date that progressive disease is documented by RECIST Version 1.1, or death, whichever comes first. Only those participants with confirmed responses of CR or PR were included in this analysis. DOR was calculated as (date of death or PD or last assessment - date of first occurrence of confirmed CR or PR + 1)/30.4375. | From first occurrence of PR or CR until the first documentation progression or death, whichever comes first (up to 22 months |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE was considered a TEAE if the onset date was on or after the start of study treatment or if the onset date was missing, or if the AE had an onset date before the start of study treatment but worsened in severity after the study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or a new treatment of anti-tumor therapy, whichever was earlier. After this period, treatment-related SAEs were also considered as TEAEs. AEs with an unknown/not reported onset date were also included. | From start of study drug administration up to approximately 40 months |
| Observed Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11 | Plasma samples were collected from the participants at the defined time points. Plasma concentrations were measured using a validated, specific, and sensitive liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method. M11 is the active metabolite for the study drug. | Cycle 1 (Day 1 and 21): Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours; Cycle 2 (Day 21): Predose and 2 hours, Cycle 3 (Day 1): Pre-dose, Cycle 3 (Day 21): Pre-dose and 2 hours, Cycle 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15 and 17 (Day 1): Pre-dose (Each cycle = 28 days) |
| Change From Baseline of Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results - QTcF Intervals Using Fridericia's Formula | QT Interval: Ventricular depolarization plus ventricular repolarization Normal Range: 400 to 460 milliseconds (msec). QTc: QT interval corrected based on the patient's heart rate. QTcF: An electrocardiographic finding in which the QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula. QTc = QT/∛(RR) RR = Respiration rate. | Baseline, Cycle 1 (Day 1 and 21): Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours; Cycle 2 and 3 (Day 21): Pre-dose (Each cycle = 28 days) |
| Change From Baseline of ECG Results -QTcB Intervals Using Bazzett's Formula | QT Interval: Ventricular depolarization plus ventricular repolarization Normal Range: 400 to 460 msec. QTc: QT interval corrected based on the patient's heart rate. QTcB: An electrocardiographic finding in which the QT interval corrected for heart rate using Bazzett's formula. | Baseline, Cycle 1 (Day 1 and 21): Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours; Cycle 2 and 3 (Day 21): Pre-dose (Each cycle = 28 days) |
| Correlation Between Fruquintinib Exposure (CminSS) and Efficacy Parameters (OS) | Model-predicted steady-state minimum plasma concentrations (CminSS) of fruquintinib based on the starting dose or adjusted for relative dose intensity [RDI] were used as the exposure measures in the efficacy exposure-response analyses. The correlation between OS and exposure was estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling. OS was analyzed as time-to-event variable using a survival model. The efficacy exposure-response analyses included participants with mCRC and pooled the data from the fruquintinib group of current Study 2019-013-GLOB1 (N=328) and from Cohort B of Study 2015-013-00US1 (NCT03251378) (N=40) as per planned analysis. Here, the "unit of measure" i.e., '1/(nanogram per milliliter [ng/mL])', corresponds to the coefficient that describes the relationship between the probability of survival and CminSS value. | Up to 22 months |
| Correlation Between Fruquintinib Exposure (CmaxSS) and Safety Parameters (Any Grade [Gr] and Grade 3+ (Gr3+): Dermatological Toxicity, Proteinuria and Gr Hemorrhage) | Model-predicted steady-state maximum plasma concentration (CmaxSS) of fruquintinib based on the assigned dose of fruquintinib were investigated as fruquintinib exposure measure for the safety exposure-response analyses. The correlation between exposure and the probability of experiencing these AEs was evaluated using logistic regression analysis, with the slope serving as the estimate. The safety exposure-response analysis included participants with cancer, and the data of this outcome measure were pooled with data from the following studies as per the planned analysis: 2019-013-GLOB1 (NCT04322539) (N=334), 2009-013-00CH1 (NCT01645215) (N=40), 2012-013-00CH3 (NCT01975077) (N=40), and 2015-013-00US1 (NCT03251378) (N=101). Here, the "unit of measure" i.e., '1/(ng/mL)', corresponds to the coefficient that describes the relationship between the probability of occurrence of the safety parameter and CmaxSS value. | Up to 22 months |
| Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale Score | EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items across 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 9 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) and global health status/QOL scale. EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 28 questions (4-point scale where 1=Not at all [best] to 4=Very Much [worst]) and 2 questions (7-point scale where 1=Very poor [worst] to 7= Excellent [best]). Raw scores are standardized and converted into scale scores ranging from 0 to 100. For global health status/QOL scale, higher scores represent better QOL. A negative change from baseline value indicates patient condition worsened. Change from baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale scores was performed by visit (i.e., cycle), using a restricted maximum likelihood (REML)-based mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) approach. | Baseline, Cycle 2, 3 and 4 (Each cycle=28 days) |
| Change From Baseline in EuroQoL 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score | The EQ-5D-5L is a self-reported health status questionnaire that consisted of six questions used to calculate a health utility score. There were two components to the EQ-5D-5L: a five-item health state profile that assessed mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression used to obtain an Index Utility Score and a general VAS score for health status. EQ-5D VAS was used to record participant's rating for his/her current health-related quality of life state on a vertical VAS with scores ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 = worst imaginable health state and 100 = best imaginable health state. The higher the score the better the health status. A negative change from baseline value represents patient condition worsened. Change from baseline in the EQ-5D-5L VAS scores was performed by visit (i.e. cycle), using a REML-based MMRM approach. | Baseline, Cycle 2, 3 and 4 (Each cycle=28 days) |
| Change From Baseline in EuroQoL 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Health Utility Index Scores | EQ-5D-5L consisted of 2 components: health state profile and optional VAS. EQ-5D health state profile had 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problem, 2= slight problem, 3= moderate problem, 4= severe problem, and 5= extreme problem. The response levels collected from the EQ-5D-5L five dimensions as a health profile are converted into an EQ-5D-5L index (utility) scores to represent participants' utility value. The range of health utility index score is from -0.285 to 1, where higher value indicates perfect health and a negative value represents a state worse than dead. Change from baseline in EQ-5D-5L health utility index scores was performed by visit (i.e., cycle), using a REML-based MMRM approach. | Baseline, Cycle 2, 3 and 4 (Each cycle=28 days) |
| Health Care Resource Utilization: Duration of Hospital Visits by Participants | Duration of hospital visit was calculated as = stop date - start date + 1. Mean and standard deviation data for duration of hospital visits (in days) by participants was reported in this outcome measure. | From start of study drug administration up to 22 months |
| Health Care Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Any Concomitant Medications Prescribed | Number of participants with any concomitant medications prescribed were reported. | From start of study drug administration up to 22 months |
| Tucson |
| Arizona |
| 85704 |
| United States |
| California Research Institute (CRI) | Los Angeles | California | 90027 | United States |
| City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center | Los Angeles | California | 91010 | United States |
| Rocky Mountain Cancer Center | Aurora | Colorado | 80012 | United States |
| The George Washington University Medical Center | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20052 | United States |
| Sarah Cannon Research Institute-S-Ft. Myers (FCS South) | Fort Myers | Florida | 33901 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic Florida | Jacksonville | Florida | 32224 | United States |
| Mount Sinai Medical Center | Miami Beach | Florida | 33140 | United States |
| Cancer Care Centers of Brevard, Inc. | Palm Bay | Florida | 32901 | United States |
| Sarah Cannon Research Institute-N-St Pete (FCS North) | St. Petersburg | Florida | 33705 | United States |
| Sarah Cannon Research Institute-Pan-Tallahassee (FCS Panhandle) | Tallahassee | Florida | 32308 | United States |
| Sarah Cannon Research-E-WPB (Florida Cancer Specialists-FCS East) | West Palm Beach | Florida | 33401 | United States |
| Emory Winship Cancer Institute | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
| Illinois Cancer Specialists | Arlington Heights | Illinois | 60005 | United States |
| University of Chicago Medical Center | Chicago | Illinois | 60637 | United States |
| Affiliated Oncologists | Chicago Ridge | Illinois | 60415 | United States |
| XCancer / Central Care Cancer Center | Garden City | Kansas | 67846 | United States |
| University of Louisville - James Brown Cancer Center | Louisville | Kentucky | 40202 | United States |
| Norton Cancer Institute Audubon | Louisville | Kentucky | 40217 | United States |
| Hematology Oncology Clinic | Baton Rouge | Louisiana | 70809 | United States |
| XCancer / Pontchartrain Cancer Center | Hammond | Louisiana | 70403 | United States |
| Maryland Oncology Hematology, P.A. | Columbia | Maryland | 21044 | United States |
| University of Michigan Health System | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48109 | United States |
| Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute | Detroit | Michigan | 48201 | United States |
| Minnesota Oncology | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55404 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic Rochester | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
| Center for Pharmaceutical Research | Kansas City | Missouri | 64114 | United States |
| Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada | Las Vegas | Nevada | 89169 | United States |
| Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey | New Brunswick | New Jersey | 08901 | United States |
| XCancer / New Mexico Oncology & Hematology Consultants | Albuquerque | New Mexico | 87109 | United States |
| Charleston Oncology | Charleston | South Carolina | 29414 | United States |
| Sarah Cannon Tennessee Oncology | Nashville | Tennessee | 37203 | United States |
| Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center | Nashville | Tennessee | 37232 | United States |
| Texas Oncology - Austin | Austin | Texas | 78705 | United States |
| Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons | Dallas | Texas | 75246 | United States |
| Texas Oncology-El Paso | El Paso | Texas | 79902 | United States |
| MD Anderson Cancer Center | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Texas Oncology-McAllen | McAllen | Texas | 78503 | United States |
| Texas Oncology-San Antonio | San Antonio | Texas | 78217 | United States |
| Texas Oncology-Tyler | Tyler | Texas | 75702 | United States |
| Virginia Oncology Associates | Norfolk | Virginia | 23502 | United States |
| Providence Regional Cancer Partnership | Everett | Washington | 98201 | United States |
| Northwest Cancer Specialists, P.C. | Vancouver | Washington | 98684 | United States |
| Medical College of Wisconsin/ Froedtert Hospital | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53226 | United States |
| Integrated Clinical Oncology Network Pty Ltd (Icon) | Brisbane | Queensland | 4001 | Australia |
| The Queen Elizabeth Hospital | Adelaide | South Australia | 5011 | Australia |
| Flinders Medical Centre | Adelaide | South Australia | 5042 | Australia |
| Western Health | Melbourne | Victoria | 3021 | Australia |
| Austin Hopistal Medical Oncology Unit | Melbourne | Victoria | 3084 | Australia |
| Monash Health | Melbourne | Victoria | 3168 | Australia |
| Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern | Linz | AUT | 4010 | Austria |
| Schwerpunktkrankenhaus Feldkirch | Rankweil | AUT | 6830 | Austria |
| Klinikum Steyr | Steyr | AUT | 4400 | Austria |
| Wiener Gesundheitsverbund - Klinik Ottakring | Vienna | AUT | 1160 | Austria |
| Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen GmbH | Wels | AUT | 4600 | Austria |
| Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt | Wiener Neustadt | AUT | 2700 | Austria |
| Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis OLV - Campus Aalst | Aalst | BEL | 9300 | Belgium |
| UCL St-Luc | Brussels | BEL | 1200 | Belgium |
| Grand Hopital de Charleroi | Charleroi | BEL | 6000 | Belgium |
| UZ Antwerpen | Edegem | BEL | 2650 | Belgium |
| Centres Hospitaliers Jolimont | Haine-Saint-Paul | BEL | 7100 | Belgium |
| UZ Leuven | Leuven | BEL | 3000 | Belgium |
| AZ Delta Roeselare | Roeselare | BEL | 8800 | Belgium |
| AZ Turnhout | Turnhout | BEL | 2300 | Belgium |
| CHU Mont-Godinne | Yvoir | BEL | 5530 | Belgium |
| Clinique CHC MontLegia | Liège | Wallonia | 4000 | Belgium |
| CHU de Lige - Domaine Universitaire du Sart Tilman | Liège | Wallonia | 4001 | Belgium |
| Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Hematoonkologie | Brno | Moravia | 60200 | Czechia |
| Fakultni nemocnice Olomouc, Onkologicka klinika | Olomouc | Moravia | 77900 | Czechia |
| Vseobecna Fakultni Nemocnice VFN, Onkologicka Klinika | Prague | 12808 | Czechia |
| East Tallinn Central Hospital Centre of Oncology | Tallinn | Harju | 11312 | Estonia |
| Sihtasutus Pohja-Eesti Regionaalhaigla (PERH) (North Estonia Medical Centre) | Tallinn | Harju | 13419 | Estonia |
| Tartu University Hospital Clinic of Haematology and Oncology | Tartu | 50406 | Estonia |
| CHU Besancon | Besançon | Franche-Comte | 25000 | France |
| Institut Bergonie | Bordeaux | FRA | 33000 | France |
| Unicancer | Caen | FRA | 14000 | France |
| Centre Georges-Francois Leclerc | Dijon | FRA | 21000 | France |
| ICM-Val d'Aurelle | Montpellier | FRA | 34298 | France |
| Saint-Louis Hospital | Paris | FRA | 75010 | France |
| Hopital St Antoine | Paris | FRA | 75012 | France |
| Hopital Pitie Salptriere | Paris | FRA | 75013 | France |
| CHU Poitiers | Poitiers | FRA | 86000 | France |
| Centre hospitalier Annecy Genevois | Pringy | FRA | 74370 | France |
| Centre Hospitalier Universitaire CHU de Rennes - Hopital de Pontchaillou | Rennes | FRA | 35033 | France |
| Institut de cancerologie Strasbourg-Europe | Strasbourg | FRA | 67033 | France |
| Institut Gustave Roussy | Villejuif | Paris | 94805 | France |
| Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen | Erlangen | Bavaria | 91054 | Germany |
| HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch Saarow | Berlin | DEU | 13125 | Germany |
| Charite - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin | Berlin | DEU | 13353 | Germany |
| Universitaetsklinik Dresden | Dresden | DEU | 1307 | Germany |
| University Hospital Essen | Essen | DEU | 45147 | Germany |
| Institut fr Klinisch Onkologische ForschungKrankenhaus Nordwest GmbH | Frankfurt am Main | DEU | 60488 | Germany |
| Haematologisch-Onkologische Praxis Hamburg Eppendorf | Hamburg | DEU | 20249 | Germany |
| Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg AK Altona | Hamburg | DEU | 22763 | Germany |
| Universitaeres Krebszentrum Leipzig | Leipzig | DEU | 4103 | Germany |
| RKH Kliniken | Ludwigsburg | DEU | 22763 | Germany |
| Universitaetsmedizin Mannheim- III. Medizinische Klinik | Mannheim | DEU | 68167 | Germany |
| Klinikum Neuperlach | München | DEU | 81737 | Germany |
| Zentrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie MVZ GmbH | Porta Westfalica | DEU | 32457 | Germany |
| Del-Pesti Centrumkorhaz Orszagos Hematologiai es Infektologiai Intezet, Szent Laszlo Korhaz | Budapest | HUN | 1097 | Hungary |
| National Institute of Oncology | Budapest | HUN | 1122 | Hungary |
| Magyar Honvedseg Egeszsegugyi Kozpont | Budapest | HUN | H-1062 | Hungary |
| Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont | Debrecen | HUN | 4032 | Hungary |
| Bacs- Kiskun Megyei Korhaz | Kecskemét | HUN | 6000 | Hungary |
| Szabolcs-Szatmar-Bereg megyei Korhazak es Egyetemi Oktatokorhaz | Nyíregyháza | HUN | 4400 | Hungary |
| Hetenyi G Korhaz, Onkologiai Kozpont | Szolnok | HUN | 5004 | Hungary |
| Szent Borbala Korhaz | Tatabánya | HUN | 2800 | Hungary |
| Somogy Megyei Kaposi Mor Oktato Korhaz, Klinikai Onkologiai Osztaly | Kaposvár | Somogy County | 7400 | Hungary |
| Zala Megyei Szent Rafael Korhaz, Onkologiai Osztaly, F epulet 3. em. | Zalaegerszeg | Zala County | 8900 | Hungary |
| Bekes Megyei Kozponti Korhaz, Pandy Kalman Tagkorhaz, Megyei Onkologiai Kozpont | Gyula | 5700 | Hungary |
| Fondazione Poliambulanza Hospital | Brescia | ITA | 25124 | Italy |
| Policlinico San Martino di Genova | Genova | ITA | 16132 | Italy |
| Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori | Milan | ITA | 20133 | Italy |
| ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda | Milan | ITA | 20162 | Italy |
| Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale | Naples | ITA | 80131 | Italy |
| Istituto Oncologico Veneto Irccs | Padova | ITA | 35128 | Italy |
| Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana | Pisa | ITA | 56126 | Italy |
| Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia | Reggio Emilia | ITA | 42123 | Italy |
| AO Card G Panico | Tricase | ITA | 73039 | Italy |
| Ospedale San Bortolo Azienda ULSS8 Berica - Distretto Est | Vicenza | ITA | 36100 | Italy |
| Istituto Clinico Humanitas | Rozzano MI | Lombardy | 20089 | Italy |
| Aichi Cancer Center | Nagoya | Aichi-ken | 464-8681 | Japan |
| National Cancer Center Hospital East | Kashiwa-shi | Chiba | 277-8577 | Japan |
| Shikoku Cancer Center | Matsuyama | Ehime | 791-0280 | Japan |
| Kyushu Cancer Center | Fukuoka | Fukuoka | 811-1395 | Japan |
| Hokkaido University Hospital | Sapporo | Hokkaido | 060-8648 | Japan |
| St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital | Kawasaki-shi | Kanagawa | 216-8511 | Japan |
| Kindai University Hospital | Osakasayama-shi | Osaka | 589-8511 | Japan |
| Osaka University Hospital | Suita-shi | Osaka | 565-0871 | Japan |
| Shizuoka Cancer Center | Shizuoka | Sunto-gun | 411-8777 | Japan |
| National Cancer Center Hospital | Chuo-ku | Tokyo | 104-0045 | Japan |
| M Sklodowska Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Klinika Gastroenterologii Onkologicznej | Warsaw | Masovia | 02034 | Poland |
| Bialostockie Centrum Onkologii im. Marii Skodowskiej-Curie | Bialystok | Podlaskie Voivodeship | 15-027 | Poland |
| Hospital Universitari Vall dHebron | Barcelona | ESP | 8035 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Reina Sofa | Córdoba | ESP | 14004 | Spain |
| Hospital General Universitario de Elche | Elche | ESP | 3203 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal | Madrid | ESP | 28034 | Spain |
| Hospital Clinico San Carlos | Madrid | ESP | 28040 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre | Madrid | ESP | 28041 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario La Paz | Madrid | ESP | 28046 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro | Madrid | ESP | 28050 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro | Majadahonda | ESP | 28222 | Spain |
| Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos Haya | Málaga | ESP | 29010 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias | Oviedo | ESP | 33013 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla | Santander | ESP | 39008 | Spain |
| Hospital ClÃ-nico Universitario de Santiago-CHUS | Santiago de Compostela | ESP | 15706 | Spain |
| Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon HGUGM | Madrid | 28007 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio | Seville | 41013 | Spain |
| Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia | Valencia | 46010 | Spain |
| Aberdeen Royal Infirmary | Aberdeen | GBR | AB25 2ZN | United Kingdom |
| The Royal Marsden Hospital | London | GBR | SW3 6JJ | United Kingdom |
| Sarah Cannon Research Institute UK | London | Middlesex | W1G 6AD | United Kingdom |
| Derived |
| Zhou X, Toms A, Morton D, Wang X, Taylor A, Dasari A, Gupta N, Chien C. Assessment of the Effects of Fruquintinib on Cardiac Safety in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Nov;65(11):1411-1419. doi: 10.1002/jcph.70051. Epub 2025 Jun 8. |
| 40163688 | Derived | Eng C, Dasari A, Lonardi S, Garcia-Carbonero R, Elez E, Yoshino T, Sobrero A, Yao J, Garcia-Alfonso P, Kocsis J, Gracian AC, Sartore-Bianchi A, Satoh T, Randrian V, Tomasek J, Chong G, Yang Z, Guevara F, Schelman W, Pallai R, Tabernero J. Fruquintinib versus placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: safety analysis of FRESCO-2. Oncologist. 2025 Mar 10;30(3):oyae360. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae360. |
| 39952149 | Derived | Sobrero A, Dasari A, Aquino J, Lonardi S, Garcia-Carbonero R, Elez E, Yoshino T, Yao J, Garcia-Alfonso P, Kocsis J, Gracian AC, Sartore-Bianchi A, Satoh T, Randrian V, Tomasek J, Chong G, Price T, Yu Z, Geiger A, Chen L, Yang Z, Schelman WR, Kania M, Tabernero J, Eng C. Health-related quality of life associated with fruquintinib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Results from the FRESCO-2 study. Eur J Cancer. 2025 Mar 11;218:115268. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115268. Epub 2025 Jan 29. |
| 37331369 | Derived | Dasari A, Lonardi S, Garcia-Carbonero R, Elez E, Yoshino T, Sobrero A, Yao J, Garcia-Alfonso P, Kocsis J, Cubillo Gracian A, Sartore-Bianchi A, Satoh T, Randrian V, Tomasek J, Chong G, Paulson AS, Masuishi T, Jones J, Csoszi T, Cremolini C, Ghiringhelli F, Shergill A, Hochster HS, Krauss J, Bassam A, Ducreux M, Elme A, Faugeras L, Kasper S, Van Cutsem E, Arnold D, Nanda S, Yang Z, Schelman WR, Kania M, Tabernero J, Eng C; FRESCO-2 Study Investigators. Fruquintinib versus placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (FRESCO-2): an international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2023 Jul 1;402(10395):41-53. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00772-9. Epub 2023 Jun 15. |
| 33993740 | Derived | Dasari A, Sobrero A, Yao J, Yoshino T, Schelman W, Yang Z, Chien C, Kania M, Tabernero J, Eng C. FRESCO-2: a global Phase III study investigating the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in metastatic colorectal cancer. Future Oncol. 2021 Aug;17(24):3151-3162. doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-0202. Epub 2021 May 17. |
Participants received placebo matched to fruquintinib oral capsule in combination with BSC once daily for 3 weeks of continuous dosing followed by a 1-week break during a treatment cycle (Each cycle length was 28 days). |
| Safety Population (SP) | The Safety population (SP) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. |
|
| Pharmacokinetic (PK) Population | The Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post dose PK sample collected and analyzed. |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Fruquintinib + BSC Group | Participants received 5 mg of fruquintinib oral capsule in combination with BSC once daily for 3 weeks of continuous dosing followed by a 1-week break during a treatment cycle (Each cycle length was 28 days). |
| BG001 | Placebo + BSC Group | Participants received placebo matched to fruquintinib oral capsule in combination with BSC once daily for 3 weeks of continuous dosing followed by a 1-week break during a treatment cycle (Each cycle length was 28 days). |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Overall Survival (OS) | OS was defined as the time (months) from date of randomization to death from any cause. OS was calculated as (date of death or last known alive - date of randomization + 1)/30.4375. Participants without report of death at the time of analysis will be censored at the date last known alive. | ITT population included all randomized participants. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | From date of randomization to death from any cause (up to 22 months) |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Progression Free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Investigator Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 | PFS was defined as the time (months) from randomization until the first radiographic documentation of objective progression as assessed by investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever comes first. More specifically, PFS was determined using all data until the last evaluable visit prior to or on the date of: (i) radiographic disease progression (PD) per RECIST v1.1; (ii) withdrawal of consent to obtain additional scans on study; or (iii) initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy other than the study drugs, whichever was earlier. PD was defined as: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline; an absolute increase of at least 5 mm in the sum of diameters of target lesions; and the appearance of one or more new lesions. | ITT population included all randomized participants. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | From randomization until the first documentation of objective progression or death, whichever comes first (up to 22 months) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) | ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best overall response of confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), per RECIST v1.1, as determined by the investigator. PR: At least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (<)10 millimeters (mm). | ITT population included all randomized participants. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | From randomization until the first documentation of best overall response (up to 22 months) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) | DCR was defined as percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) (for at least 7 weeks) per RECIST v1.1, as determined by the investigator. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum on study. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (nadir), including baseline. | ITT population included all randomized participants. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | From randomization until the first documentation of best overall response (up to 22 months) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Duration of Response (DOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) | DOR was defined as the time (in months) from the first occurrence of PR or CR by RECIST Version 1.1, until the first date that progressive disease is documented by RECIST Version 1.1, or death, whichever comes first. Only those participants with confirmed responses of CR or PR were included in this analysis. DOR was calculated as (date of death or PD or last assessment - date of first occurrence of confirmed CR or PR + 1)/30.4375. | Analysis was performed on subset of participants who had a response. Here, '0' in 'overall number of participants analyzed represents that DOR could only be analyzed in participants who achieved a response. As no participant in the Placebo Plus BSC Group cohort achieved any response, no DOR is available. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | From first occurrence of PR or CR until the first documentation progression or death, whichever comes first (up to 22 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE was considered a TEAE if the onset date was on or after the start of study treatment or if the onset date was missing, or if the AE had an onset date before the start of study treatment but worsened in severity after the study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or a new treatment of anti-tumor therapy, whichever was earlier. After this period, treatment-related SAEs were also considered as TEAEs. AEs with an unknown/not reported onset date were also included. | SP included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From start of study drug administration up to approximately 40 months |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Observed Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11 | Plasma samples were collected from the participants at the defined time points. Plasma concentrations were measured using a validated, specific, and sensitive liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method. M11 is the active metabolite for the study drug. | PK population was used for tabulation of fruquintinib and M11 concentrations from PK plasma samples collected from the Fruquintinib + BSC Group. PK samples for the Placebo + BSC Group were not analyzed. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants in the Fruquintinib + BSC Group who were evaluable for this outcome measure and "number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable at the specified timepoints. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Cycle 1 (Day 1 and 21): Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours; Cycle 2 (Day 21): Predose and 2 hours, Cycle 3 (Day 1): Pre-dose, Cycle 3 (Day 21): Pre-dose and 2 hours, Cycle 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15 and 17 (Day 1): Pre-dose (Each cycle = 28 days) |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline of Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results - QTcF Intervals Using Fridericia's Formula | QT Interval: Ventricular depolarization plus ventricular repolarization Normal Range: 400 to 460 milliseconds (msec). QTc: QT interval corrected based on the patient's heart rate. QTcF: An electrocardiographic finding in which the QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula. QTc = QT/∛(RR) RR = Respiration rate. | SP included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and "number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable at the specified time points. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | millisecond (msec) | Baseline, Cycle 1 (Day 1 and 21): Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours; Cycle 2 and 3 (Day 21): Pre-dose (Each cycle = 28 days) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline of ECG Results -QTcB Intervals Using Bazzett's Formula | QT Interval: Ventricular depolarization plus ventricular repolarization Normal Range: 400 to 460 msec. QTc: QT interval corrected based on the patient's heart rate. QTcB: An electrocardiographic finding in which the QT interval corrected for heart rate using Bazzett's formula. | SP included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable at the specified timepoints. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | msec | Baseline, Cycle 1 (Day 1 and 21): Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours; Cycle 2 and 3 (Day 21): Pre-dose (Each cycle = 28 days) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Correlation Between Fruquintinib Exposure (CminSS) and Efficacy Parameters (OS) | Model-predicted steady-state minimum plasma concentrations (CminSS) of fruquintinib based on the starting dose or adjusted for relative dose intensity [RDI] were used as the exposure measures in the efficacy exposure-response analyses. The correlation between OS and exposure was estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling. OS was analyzed as time-to-event variable using a survival model. The efficacy exposure-response analyses included participants with mCRC and pooled the data from the fruquintinib group of current Study 2019-013-GLOB1 (N=328) and from Cohort B of Study 2015-013-00US1 (NCT03251378) (N=40) as per planned analysis. Here, the "unit of measure" i.e., '1/(nanogram per milliliter [ng/mL])', corresponds to the coefficient that describes the relationship between the probability of survival and CminSS value. | The efficacy exposure-response analyses included participants who were evaluable for the population PK analysis and therefore had PK parameter estimates to enable estimation of fruquintinib exposure and evaluated for the parameter/endpoint in question. Here, "overall number of participants analyzed" signified those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. The population for this measure included participants from both studies 2015-013-00US1 and the current study. | Posted | Number | 1/(ng/mL) | Up to 22 months |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Correlation Between Fruquintinib Exposure (CmaxSS) and Safety Parameters (Any Grade [Gr] and Grade 3+ (Gr3+): Dermatological Toxicity, Proteinuria and Gr Hemorrhage) | Model-predicted steady-state maximum plasma concentration (CmaxSS) of fruquintinib based on the assigned dose of fruquintinib were investigated as fruquintinib exposure measure for the safety exposure-response analyses. The correlation between exposure and the probability of experiencing these AEs was evaluated using logistic regression analysis, with the slope serving as the estimate. The safety exposure-response analysis included participants with cancer, and the data of this outcome measure were pooled with data from the following studies as per the planned analysis: 2019-013-GLOB1 (NCT04322539) (N=334), 2009-013-00CH1 (NCT01645215) (N=40), 2012-013-00CH3 (NCT01975077) (N=40), and 2015-013-00US1 (NCT03251378) (N=101). Here, the "unit of measure" i.e., '1/(ng/mL)', corresponds to the coefficient that describes the relationship between the probability of occurrence of the safety parameter and CmaxSS value. | Safety exposure-response analyses included participants who were evaluable for population PK analysis and therefore had PK parameter estimates to enable estimation of fruquintinib exposure and evaluated for parameter/endpoint in question. Here, "overall number of participants analyzed" signified those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. The population for this measure included participants from 2019-013-GLOB1, 2009-013-00CH1, 2012-013-00CH3, and 2015-013-00US1. | Posted | Number | 1/(ng/mL) | Up to 22 months |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale Score | EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items across 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 9 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) and global health status/QOL scale. EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 28 questions (4-point scale where 1=Not at all [best] to 4=Very Much [worst]) and 2 questions (7-point scale where 1=Very poor [worst] to 7= Excellent [best]). Raw scores are standardized and converted into scale scores ranging from 0 to 100. For global health status/QOL scale, higher scores represent better QOL. A negative change from baseline value indicates patient condition worsened. Change from baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale scores was performed by visit (i.e., cycle), using a restricted maximum likelihood (REML)-based mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) approach. | ITT population included all randomized participants. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable at the specified timepoints. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Cycle 2, 3 and 4 (Each cycle=28 days) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score | The EQ-5D-5L is a self-reported health status questionnaire that consisted of six questions used to calculate a health utility score. There were two components to the EQ-5D-5L: a five-item health state profile that assessed mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression used to obtain an Index Utility Score and a general VAS score for health status. EQ-5D VAS was used to record participant's rating for his/her current health-related quality of life state on a vertical VAS with scores ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 = worst imaginable health state and 100 = best imaginable health state. The higher the score the better the health status. A negative change from baseline value represents patient condition worsened. Change from baseline in the EQ-5D-5L VAS scores was performed by visit (i.e. cycle), using a REML-based MMRM approach. | ITT population included all randomized participants. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable at the specified categories. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Cycle 2, 3 and 4 (Each cycle=28 days) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Health Utility Index Scores | EQ-5D-5L consisted of 2 components: health state profile and optional VAS. EQ-5D health state profile had 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problem, 2= slight problem, 3= moderate problem, 4= severe problem, and 5= extreme problem. The response levels collected from the EQ-5D-5L five dimensions as a health profile are converted into an EQ-5D-5L index (utility) scores to represent participants' utility value. The range of health utility index score is from -0.285 to 1, where higher value indicates perfect health and a negative value represents a state worse than dead. Change from baseline in EQ-5D-5L health utility index scores was performed by visit (i.e., cycle), using a REML-based MMRM approach. | ITT population included all randomized participants. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable at the specified categories. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Cycle 2, 3 and 4 (Each cycle=28 days) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Health Care Resource Utilization: Duration of Hospital Visits by Participants | Duration of hospital visit was calculated as = stop date - start date + 1. Mean and standard deviation data for duration of hospital visits (in days) by participants was reported in this outcome measure. | ITT population included all randomized participants. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | days per visit | From start of study drug administration up to 22 months | Number of visits | Number of visits |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Health Care Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Any Concomitant Medications Prescribed | Number of participants with any concomitant medications prescribed were reported. | ITT population included all randomized participants. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From start of study drug administration up to 22 months |
|
|
From start of study drug administration up to approximately 40 months
All-Cause Mortality data collected during the study was assessed for all randomized participants. Serious AEs and Non-Serious AEs data were collected based on safety population that included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Fruquintinib + BSC Group | Participants received 5 mg of fruquintinib oral capsule in combination with BSC once daily for 3 weeks of continuous dosing followed by a 1-week break during a treatment cycle (Each cycle length was 28 days). | 411 | 461 | 173 | 456 | 446 | 456 |
| EG001 | Placebo + BSC Group | Participants received placebo matched to fruquintinib oral capsule in combination with BSC once daily for 3 weeks of continuous dosing followed by a 1-week break during a treatment cycle (Each cycle length was 28 days). | 203 | 230 | 88 | 230 | 205 | 230 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Small intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rectal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ileus | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intestinal perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Small intestinal perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Stomatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Subileus | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colonic fistula | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastric haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastric perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematemesis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Large intestine perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oesophageal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oesophagitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancreatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancreatitis acute | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rectal perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ascites | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Enterovesical fistula | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Large intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rectal stenosis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Disease progression | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| General physical health deterioration | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Condition aggravated | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiac chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chills | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Death | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Discomfort | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Malaise | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ulcer | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Generalised oedema | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sudden death | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abscess limb | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Biliary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| COVID-19 pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Clostridium difficile colitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Clostridium difficile infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Device related infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Empyema | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fournier's gangrene | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Perirectal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyelonephritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Septic shock | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coronavirus infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urosepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound infection bacterial | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute respiratory distress syndrome | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchospasm | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epistaxis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hydrothorax | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonitis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumothorax | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atelectasis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchopleural fistula | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Interstitial lung disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory distress | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute kidney injury | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract obstruction | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hydronephrosis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ureteric obstruction | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Proteinuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal impairment | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vesicocutaneous fistula | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Biliary obstruction | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholangitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic failure | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bile duct stenosis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bile duct stone | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic function abnormal | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertransaminasaemia | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Jaundice | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperbilirubinaemia | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Encephalopathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spinal cord compression | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebral haemorrhage | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebral infarction | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depressed level of consciousness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epilepsy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic encephalopathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transient ischaemic attack | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ischaemic stroke | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyponatraemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diabetes mellitus inadequate control | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypernatraemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoalbuminaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypokalaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypovolaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fistula | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscular weakness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertensive crisis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Deep vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemorrhage | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Femur fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Recall phenomenon | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sternal fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lung cancer metastatic | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metastases to central nervous system | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metastases to liver | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metastases to meninges | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metastasis | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tumour invasion | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tumour pain | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Malignant neoplasm progression | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neoplasm progression | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tumour associated fever | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood bilirubin increased | Investigations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood creatinine increased | Investigations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Liver function test abnormal | Investigations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| SARS-CoV-2 test positive | Investigations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure congestive | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac arrest | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Polycythaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leukocytosis | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Confusional state | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Female genital tract fistula | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intermenstrual bleeding | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin necrosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypothyroidism | Endocrine disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Device dislocation | Product Issues | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteomyelitis chronic | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mucosal inflammation | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Stomatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight decreased | Investigations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood bilirubin increased | Investigations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood thyroid stimulating hormone increased | Investigations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Platelet count decreased | Investigations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood alkaline phosphatase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypokalaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysphonia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypothyroidism | Endocrine disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Proteinuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 26.0. | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| William Schelman, MD, PhD | HUTCHMED International | +1-973-306-4490 | williams@hutch-med.com |
| Jul 18, 2023 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015179 | Colorectal Neoplasms |
| D003110 | Colonic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007414 | Intestinal Neoplasms |
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D012002 | Rectal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000591844 | HMPL-013 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other |
|
| White |
|
| Other |
|
| Multiple races |
|
| Not reported/unknown |
|
Participants received placebo matched to fruquintinib oral capsule in combination with BSC once daily for 3 weeks of continuous dosing followed by a 1-week break during a treatment cycle (Each cycle length was 28 days).
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| OG001 | Placebo + BSC Group | Participants received placebo matched to fruquintinib oral capsule in combination with BSC once daily for 3 weeks of continuous dosing followed by a 1-week break during a treatment cycle (Each cycle length was 28 days). |
|
|
| OG001 |
| Placebo + BSC Group |
Participants received placebo matched to fruquintinib oral capsule in combination with BSC once daily for 3 weeks of continuous dosing followed by a 1-week break during a treatment cycle (Each cycle length was 28 days). |
|
|
Participants received placebo matched to fruquintinib oral capsule in combination with BSC once daily for 3 weeks of continuous dosing followed by a 1-week break during a treatment cycle (Each cycle length was 28 days). |
|
|
| Number of visits |
|
|
|