Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to evaluate dentoskeletal changes concomitant with different three levels of force application for maxillary protraction in growing patients with skeletal class 3 malocclusion.
Nanda reported that numerous experimental studies on primates have shown orthopedic changes in response to extraoral forces; however, very few studies have made an attempt to analyze the different force variables and their relationship to facial sutures. In consideration of the variables, experimental and clinical studies were initiated in their laboratory in 1972. A study on protraction of midfacial bones on primates reported that the point of force application significantly influences the center of rotation of the maxilla in rhesus monkeys. Our unpublished data also show that centers of rotation are influenced by the magnitude of force. The study showed that the maxilla can be successfully protracted by means of carefully controlled forces.
Based on the aforementioned data, we can hypothesize that the point of force application for maxillary protraction in relation to the center of resistance of maxilla could be utilized in order to correct skeletal class 3 malocclusions with different vertical dimension discrepancies.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| classic occlusal level, low point of force application | Active Comparator | the point of force application for maxillary protraction is at the level of the occlusal plane. |
|
| Nasal level, Medium point of force application | Active Comparator | the point of force application for maxillary protraction is at 20 mm from the occlusal plane (Nasal floor). |
|
| Infrorbital level, High level | Active Comparator | the point of force application for maxillary protraction is at the level of the infraorbital foramen |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petit typeface mask | Device | (Intraoral) Hyrax expander for maxilary sutures disarticulation through expansion, (Extraoral) Face mask for generating maxillary protraction forces and head gear face-bow to act as a connector between both intra and extra oral parts. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Amount of maxillary advancement | the increase in maxillary length (condalyon-A point) in mm using Cone Beam Computed Tomgraphy (CBCT) | 8 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| degree of maxillary rotation | the change in maxillary inclination (occlusal plane to SN line) in degrees using Cone Beam Computed Tomgraphy (CBCT) | 8 months |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria:
The patients will be included in the study if they have the following:
Exclusion criteria:
The patients will be excluded from the study if they have the following:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alazhar University | Cairo | 3511 | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|