Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This trial investigates effects of individualized (by compliance guided pressure settings) flow-controlled ventilation compared to best clinical practice pressure controlled ventilation in cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass.
The aim of the study is to investigate flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) during cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. Previous preclinical trials have already shown improved oxygenation and CO2 removal within a significantly reduced respiratory minute volume as an expression of more efficient gas exchange with FCV compared to volume controlled ventilation (VCV). Preliminary data of our own animal study comparing individualized FCV by compliance guided pressure settings with state-of-the-art low tidal volume pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) confirmed previous findings with a significantly improved oxygenation by 20% while reducing respiratory minute volume. We therefore assume that FCV may be a more lung protective ventilation method.
Open heart surgery requires bridging of the heart and lung function with a cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) performed by a heart-lung machine. During this time the lung is most frequently not ventilated at all and lies collapsed in the chest for several hours. After weaning from CPB, the lungs must be recruited and ensure sufficient gas exchange of the blood. Not surprisingly, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) at 20-30% is comparatively high after cardiac surgery and is the leading cause of perioperative mortality. Based on previous trials we expect improved oxygenation and thus arterial partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) is the main primary outcome parameter of this study. Furthermore, we expect improved recruitment of lung tissue due to controlled expiratory flow in FCV without the need of recruitment maneuvers, which may cause deleterious effects on lung tissue. Thus, lung tissue aeration assessed by Hounsfield units analyses of a postoperative computed tomography will be a secondary outcome parameter.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| FCV | Experimental | Artificial ventilation will be performed with individualized flow-controlled ventilation (Evone, Ventinova Medical B.V., Eindhoven, the Netherlands) during cardiac surgery until admission to postoperative ICU. Individualisation will be established by compliance guided end-expiratory and peak pressure setting, flow setting will be adjusted to secure normocapnia and I:E Ratio set to 1:1. |
|
| PCV | Active Comparator | Artificial ventilation will be performed with low tidal volume pressure-controlled ventilation (Primus, Dräger, Lübeck, Germany) during cardiac surgery until admission to postoperative ICU. Peak pressure will be set to achieve a tidal volume of 7ml/kg predicted body weight at a compliance titrated positive end-expiratory pressure. Respiratory rate will be set to maintain normocapnia and I:E ratio set to 1:1.5 except extension of expiration is necessary in order to avoid air trapping. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evone | Device | Airway ventilation device |
| |
| Primus |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Horowitz Index | arterial partial pressure of Oxygen (paO2) / fraction of inspired Oxygen (FiO2) | 15 minutes after chest closure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| lung tissue aeration | Lung tissue aeration assessed by Hounsfield units analysis of computed tomography | immediately postoperative |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Judith Martini, MD | Medical University Innsbruck, Dept. of Anaesthesiology | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical University Innsbruck | Innsbruck | Tyrol | 6020 | Austria |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29734208 | Background | Schmidt J, Wenzel C, Mahn M, Spassov S, Cristina Schmitz H, Borgmann S, Lin Z, Haberstroh J, Meckel S, Eiden S, Wirth S, Buerkle H, Schumann S. Improved lung recruitment and oxygenation during mandatory ventilation with a new expiratory ventilation assistance device: A controlled interventional trial in healthy pigs. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Oct;35(10):736-744. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000819. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D053120 | Respiratory Aspiration |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012120 | Respiration Disorders |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
controlled, prospective
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Device |
Airway ventilation device |
|