Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Ministry of Health, France | OTHER_GOV |
| Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) | OTHER_GOV |
| Ottawa Hospital Research Institute | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be the earliest sign of cancer. Identifying occult cancers at the time of VTE diagnosis may lead to significant improvement of patients' care. This is also an upmost issue for patients who want to know if an underlying cancer might have triggered the VTE.
An individual patient-level data meta-analysis (IPDMA) supports extensive screening strategies for occult cancer especially based on FDG PET/CT, and suggests that the best target population for cancer screening would be patients with unprovoked VTE older than 50 years of age (6.7% in patients aged 50 years or more vs. 1.0% in patients of less than 50 years (OR: 7.1, 95% CI: 3.1 to 16%).
The identification of subgroups of patients at high risk of cancer might enable more efficient screening strategies for early detection of cancer. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be the first manifestation of an occult cancer. All tumor sites may be involved. In an individual patient-level data meta-analysis (IPDMA), it was reported a 1-year prevalence of occult cancer of 5.2% (95%CI 4.1-6.5) among patients presenting with unprovoked VTE.
Two recent multicenter randomized controlled trials (e.g. SOME (Canada) and MVTEP (France) trials) failed to demonstrate that extensive cancer screening strategies diagnosed more cancers, more early stage tumors, or improved cancer-related mortality in comparison with a more limited screening strategy. However, the main limitation of these studies was the twice lower than expected overall incidence of occult cancer diagnosis in unselected patients with unprovoked VTE, which limited the statistical power. In the IPDMA, it was also reported that the 1-year period prevalence of occult cancer was 7-fold higher in patients aged ≥ 50 (6.8%; 95%CI 5.6-8.3) as compared with those < 50 years (1.0%; 95%CI 0.5-2.3).
Moreover, in the MVTEP trial, the incidence of missed cancers over a 2-years follow-up period was significantly lower in patients randomized to a 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission/Computed Tomography (FDG-PET/CT) screening strategy. Thus, the most promising diagnostic modality for occult cancer screening seems to be FDG-PET/CT. FDG-PET/CT which allows a one-stop whole-body imaging, is routinely used for the diagnosis, staging and restaging of various cancers.
The MVTEP2 Trial seeks to determine if among higher risk patients (≥ 50 year-old) with a first unprovoked VTE, a cancer screening strategy including a FDG-PET/CT decreases the number of missed occult cancers detected over a 1-year follow-up period as compared with a limited screening alone.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Limited cancer screening | Active Comparator | Limited screening alone. |
|
| Limited cancer screening + FDG PET/CT | Experimental | Limited screening + FDG PET/CT |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Limited cancer screening | Diagnostic Test | The limited cancer screening will include: 1) a complete medical history and physical examination; 2) complete blood count; 3) liver function tests (AST, ALT, ALP, bilirubin); and 4) chest X-ray. In women, a breast examination, Pap smear/pelvic examination (if < 70 years old and previously sexually active) and mammogram will be performed, if not conducted in last year. In men, similarly, prostate examination and PSA testing will be performed, if not conducted in the last year. All patients will undergo colon cancer screening as per local practice. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Occult cancer missed by screening strategies | Occult cancer "missed" by cancer screening defined as proven cancer diagnosed (either biopsy proven cancer or cancer diagnosis approved by adjudication committee in the absence of biopsy proven cancer) from the time of cancer screening completion to the end of the 1-year follow-up period, and not detected at the time of screening. In other words, "missed" means the number of new cancers diagnosed in patients considered not to have cancer after having completed the assigned cancer screening strategy (i.e false negative results of screening strategies). | At 1 year of follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Occult cancer diagnosed by screening strategies | The proportion of patients with a new cancer diagnosis after completion of the initial allocated screening strategy. | At 1 month |
| Early vs Adanced-stage cancers |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients aged 50 years or older with a new diagnosis of first unprovoked proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) will be eligible to participate into the study.
Unprovoked VTE is defined as the absence of any of the following predisposing factors:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients will be excluded from the study if they have any of the following criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hopital Montfort | Ottawa | Ontario | Canada | |||
| Ottawa Hospital Research Institute |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26672686 | Background | Robin P, Le Roux PY, Planquette B, Accassat S, Roy PM, Couturaud F, Ghazzar N, Prevot-Bitot N, Couturier O, Delluc A, Sanchez O, Tardy B, Le Gal G, Salaun PY; MVTEP study group. Limited screening with versus without (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT for occult malignancy in unprovoked venous thromboembolism: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Feb;17(2):193-199. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00480-5. Epub 2015 Dec 8. | |
| 26095467 |
Not provided
Not provided
All collected data that underlie results in a publication
Data will be available beginning three years and ending fifteen years following the final study report completion
Data access requests will be reviewed by the internal committee of Brest UH. Requestors will be required to sign and complete a data access agreement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Limited cancer screening + FDG PET/CT | Diagnostic Test | The limited cancer screening (as described above) in combination with a FDG PET/CT. |
|
The proportion of early-stage (T1-2N0M0) as per the World Health Organization TNM classification system) versus advanced-stage tumors at initial screening and during follow-up.
| At 1 year of follow-up |
| Cancer-related mortality | Cancer-related mortality during a 5-year follow-up period. | At 5 years of follow-up |
| Cost effectiveness analysis | Additional cost per additional cancer detected. | At 1 year of follow-up |
| Recurrent VTE | Rate of recurrent VTE | At 1 year of follow-up |
| Decision aid to assist patients in the decision of cancer screening | Development of a decision aid to assist patients in the decision of cancer screening | At 1 year of follow-up |
| Additional tests | The proportion of patients receiving additional tests following each strategy | At 1 year of follow-up |
| Ottawa |
| Ontario |
| Canada |
| Sunnybrook Research Institute | Toronto | Ontario | Canada |
| University Health Network | Toronto | Ontario | Canada |
| Jewish General Hospital | Montreal | Quebec | Canada |
| Sherbrooke Hospital | Sherbrooke | Canada |
| CH des Pays de Morlaix | Morlaix | France | 29600 | France |
| CH Agen | Agen | France |
| CHU Angers | Angers | France |
| Brest University Hospital | Brest | France |
| CHU de Clermont-Ferrand | Clermont-Ferrand | France |
| CHU de Dijon | Dijon | France |
| CHU de Limoges | Limoges | France |
| Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou | Paris | France |
| CHU Saint-Etienne | Saint-Etienne | France |
| Hôpital Saint Musse - CH Toulon | Toulon | France |
| Background |
| Carrier M, Lazo-Langner A, Shivakumar S, Tagalakis V, Zarychanski R, Solymoss S, Routhier N, Douketis J, Danovitch K, Lee AY, Le Gal G, Wells PS, Corsi DJ, Ramsay T, Coyle D, Chagnon I, Kassam Z, Tao H, Rodger MA; SOME Investigators. Screening for Occult Cancer in Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 20;373(8):697-704. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506623. Epub 2015 Jun 22. |
| 28828492 | Background | van Es N, Le Gal G, Otten HM, Robin P, Piccioli A, Lecumberri R, Jara-Palomares L, Religa P, Rieu V, Rondina M, Beckers MM, Prandoni P, Salaun PY, Di Nisio M, Bossuyt PM, Buller HR, Carrier M. Screening for Occult Cancer in Patients With Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 19;167(6):410-417. doi: 10.7326/M17-0868. Epub 2017 Aug 22. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016769 | Embolism and Thrombosis |
| D020246 | Venous Thrombosis |
| D011655 | Pulmonary Embolism |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D013927 | Thrombosis |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D004617 | Embolism |
Not provided
Not provided