Comparison of Multi-point Pacing and Conventional CRT Through Non-invasive Hemodynamics Measurement and Global Longitudinal Strain Assessment

Comparison of Multi-point Pacing and Conventional CRT Through Non-invasive Hemodynamics Measurement and Global Longitudinal Strain Assessment

Pilot, perspective, multi-center non-randomized study comparing Multi-point pacing and conventional CRT through non-invasive hemodynamics measurement and Global Longitudinal Strain assessment

Inclusion Criteria:

• Recent or scheduled implantation of CRT-D system with quadripolar lead and MPP technology in patient with indications to CRT according to current guidelines

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients in Atrial Tachycardia (AT) or Atrial Fibrillation (AF) at the time of the enrollment or with persistent or long-standing persistent/chronic AF
• NYHA IV patients
• Right Bundle Branch Block