TUBectomy With Delayed Oophorectomy as Alternative for Risk-reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy in High Risk Women to Assess the Safety of Prevention: TUBA-WISP II Study.
TUBectomy With Delayed Oophorectomy as Alternative for Risk-reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy in High Risk Women to Assess the Safety of Prevention: TUBA-WISP II Study.
The aim of the project is to evaluate the risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy as an alternative for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in high risk women with respect to ovarian cancer incidence.
In BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers, a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is recommended around the age of 40. This recommendation is based on a 10-40% life-time risk of ovarian cancer in this population and disappointing results of ovarian cancer surveillance for early detection. Moreover, the mortality rate of ovarian cancer is high. Effects of RRSO are a decrease in ovarian cancer risk (80-96%) on one hand and immediate onset of menopause and non-cancer related morbidity on the other hand. The fifty percent breast cancer risk reduction after RRSO has become disputable in the last years. Based on multiple studies showing that most high-grade serous ovarian cancers develop at the distal end of the Fallopian tube, an innovative strategy for RRSO has been developed for this study proposal: risk-reducing salpingectomy (RRS) with delayed risk-reducing oophorectomy (RRO). However, the safety of this strategy has not been proven yet. Before implementing this innovative strategy as standard care we need to investigate the long term effects on ovarian cancer incidence.
Inclusion Criteria:
Women with a class 5 (definitely pathogenic) BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, RAD51D or BRIP1 germline mutation in one of the participating centers.
Age at inclusion;
Childbearing completed
Presence of at least one fallopian tube
Participants may have a personal history of non-ovarian malignancy
Informed consent must be obtained and documented according to national and local regulatory requirements and the local rules followed in the institution.
Exclusion Criteria:
Joanne.deHullu@radboudumc.nl+31 (0) 24 36 16683
khlu@mdanderson.org(713) 745-8902
Richmon, Victoria 3121, Australia
ngaire.latch@unimelb.edu.au+61394266666
Berlin-Spandau, Germany
Nordbyhagen, Norway
ngaire.latch@unimelb.edu.au+61285140000
ngaire.latch@unimelb.edu.au+61288905555
ngaire.latch@unimelb.edu.au+61738344444
ngaire.latch@unimelb.edu.au+61736468111
ngaire.latch@unimelb.edu.au+61733947111
ngaire.latch@unimelb.edu.au+61870740000
ngaire.latch@unimelb.edu.au+61393445000
ngaire.latch@unimelb.edu.au+61 3 8458 4444
ngaire.latch@unimelb.edu.au03 8345 1333
ngaire.latch@unimelb.edu.au+61864582222
ngaire.latch@unimelb.edu.au+61394266666
Joanne.deHullu@radboudumc.nl+31 (0) 24 36 16683
jurgen.piek@catharinaziekenhuis.nl