Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3UG1DA013035-18S3 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Using mixed methods and triangulating multiples sources of data collected over the course of the parent (CTN-0079 - NCT03544112) and the ancillary studies to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, sustainability and impact of the emergency department (ED)-initiated Buprenorphine (BUP) clinical program and implementation facilitation strategy and identify factors influencing diffusion and effectiveness.
The ancillary study will use mixed-methods combining quantitative and qualitative inquiry (interview/focus group and field notes) with administrative and health record data with some analyses including data collected from the parent CTN-0079 (NCT03544112) study. Further, qualitative data will be analyzed in the context of themes derived from CTN-0069 (NCT03023930) and CTN-0079. CTN-0079-A1 is planned to be conducted at two of the three sites of the parent study: (1) Catholic Medical Center, Manchester, New Hampshire; (2) Bellevue/NYU Health and Hospitals, New York, NY. Many of the methods, operating procedures, measures and forms will be retained or adapted from the parent study. However, CTN-0079-A1 is a new study in which lessons learned through the parent study have informed important design modifications necessary to improve study rigor and utility.
As in the parent study, CTN-0079, all clinical care (BUP and referral) will be delivered as part of each facility's clinical protocol, rather than as a research procedure. Implementation Facilitation (IF) activities will continue during ancillary trial preparation with a more intensive booster of IF activities occurring in the last month prior to trial commencement. Thereafter, all study IF support will cease and ancillary study data collection will begin. Data collection will occur over a course of approximately 12 months, divided into two 6-month study periods - the Post-IF and Maintenance Periods. A period of at least 6 months should separate the beginning of the Maintenance Period from the time of last study intervention.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ED patients | Administrative and health record data will be examined to assess rates of screening, assessment, eligibility determination, etc. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical program implementation | Behavioral | Using mixed methods and triangulating multiple sources of data collected over the course of parent and ancillary studies to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, sustainability, and impact of the ED-initiated BUP clinical program and implementation facilitation strategy and identify factors influencing diffusion and effectiveness. Converging provider and patient perspectives and field notes with process measures and intervention outcomes, including proportions screened, treated, and engaged in treatment, will provide explanation to contextualize and better understand feasibility, acceptability, and factors associated with the rate with which the ED-initiated BUP innovation is adopted and how well it is sustained. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percent of Participants Who Received Emergency Department (ED)-Initiated/Expedited Buprenorphine (BUP) | The outcome will be calculated using the following formula: [(Candidates who receive ED-initiated BUP with any disposition) + (Candidates who receive ED-expedited BUP and who are discharged)] / [(Candidates who are discharged) + (Candidates who receive ED-initiated BUP that are not discharged)]. | Up to Month 12 |
| Percent of Participants Who Received ED-Initiated/Expedited BUP Who Were Confirmed to be Engaged in Formal Addiction Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) on the 30th Day Following Discharge | The outcome will be calculated using the following formula: (participants who are confirmed to be engaged in formal addiction treatment for Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) on the 30th day following discharge / total number of participants who received ED-initiated/expedited BUP). | Day 30 Post-Discharge (Up to Month 12) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percent of Discharged Participants Who Received ED-Initiated BUP | The outcome will be calculated using the following formula: [(ED-initiated, discharged) + (ED-expedited, discharged)] / All candidates who were discharged | Up to Month 12 |
| Percent of Not-Admitted Participants Who Received ED-Initiated BUP |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Qualitative Population:
Full Study Population & Limited Study Population:
Be able to speak English sufficiently to understand study procedures
Be a potential candidate for ED-initiated BUP by meeting either of the 2 criteria:
a) Assessment conducted by an RA indicates that the patient- (all must be true): i. has had nonmedical opioid use within the last 7 days, ii. meets DSM-5 criteria for moderate or severe opioid use disorder (OUD), iii. denies methadone use within 72 hours of ED visit registration, iv. is not engaged in formal medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment, v. is not prescribed opioids for chronic pain management, vi. reports being interested or "not sure" if interested in receiving BUP as elicited on the ED Health Survey during the index ED visit.
b) Absence of clinical documentation associated with the ED visit indicating that the patient is not a candidate for ED-initiated BUP.
Exclusion Criteria:
Qualitative Population:
Full Study Population:
Limited Study Population:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study population will include ED patients.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ryan McCormack, MD, MS | NYU Langone Health | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catholic Medical Center | Manchester | New Hampshire | 03102 | United States | ||
| Bellevue Hospital Center |
All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification
Data sets for CTN protocols will be available after (1) the primary paper has been accepted for publication, or (2) the data is locked for more than 18 months, whichever comes first.
Anyone who wishes to access the data.Any purpose. Data are available indefinitely at https://datashare.nida.nih.gov/
Not provided
Certain Outcome Measures of the current study were pre-specified to utilize participants not enrolled in the study. These participants are represented in the "Patients Identified via Chart Review" arm. As these participants were not enrolled in the study, they are not counted in the Protocol Enrollment. Enrolled participants are represented in the "ED Patients" arm.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | ED Patients | Administrative and health record data will be examined to assess rates of screening, assessment, eligibility determination, etc. Clinical program implementation: Using mixed methods and triangulating multiple sources of data collected over the course of parent and ancillary studies to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, sustainability, and impact of the ED-initiated BUP clinical program and implementation facilitation strategy and identify factors influencing diffusion and effectiveness. Converging provider and patient perspectives and field notes with process measures and intervention outcomes, including proportions screened, treated, and engaged in treatment, will provide explanation to contextualize and better understand feasibility, acceptability, and factors associated with the rate with which the ED-initiated BUP innovation is adopted and how well it is sustained. |
| FG001 | Patients Identified Via Chart Review | Patients who were identified via retrospective chart review for the purpose of outcome measure analysis. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | ED Patients | Administrative and health record data will be examined to assess rates of screening, assessment, eligibility determination, etc. Clinical program implementation: Using mixed methods and triangulating multiple sources of data collected over the course of parent and ancillary studies to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, sustainability, and impact of the ED-initiated BUP clinical program and implementation facilitation strategy and identify factors influencing diffusion and effectiveness. Converging provider and patient perspectives and field notes with process measures and intervention outcomes, including proportions screened, treated, and engaged in treatment, will provide explanation to contextualize and better understand feasibility, acceptability, and factors associated with the rate with which the ED-initiated BUP innovation is adopted and how well it is sustained. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percent of Participants Who Received Emergency Department (ED)-Initiated/Expedited Buprenorphine (BUP) | The outcome will be calculated using the following formula: [(Candidates who receive ED-initiated BUP with any disposition) + (Candidates who receive ED-expedited BUP and who are discharged)] / [(Candidates who are discharged) + (Candidates who receive ED-initiated BUP that are not discharged)]. | The overall number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure (n=1489) represents individuals identified via retrospective chart review and data matching for all adult emergency department (ED) patients identified to have nonmedical opioid use presenting to the ED during the IF, Post-IF or Maintenance periods. This outcome was not assessed among participants in the ED patients arm. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | Up to Month 12 |
|
12 Months
Among enrolled patients (participants in the ED Patients arm), serious adverse events and other (non-serious) adverse events were not assessed; only death was assessed. All-Cause Mortality, Serious, and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events were not intended to be monitored/assessed among patients identified via chart review.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | ED Patients | Administrative and health record data will be examined to assess rates of screening, assessment, eligibility determination, etc. Clinical program implementation: Using mixed methods and triangulating multiple sources of data collected over the course of parent and ancillary studies to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, sustainability, and impact of the ED-initiated BUP clinical program and implementation facilitation strategy and identify factors influencing diffusion and effectiveness. Converging provider and patient perspectives and field notes with process measures and intervention outcomes, including proportions screened, treated, and engaged in treatment, will provide explanation to contextualize and better understand feasibility, acceptability, and factors associated with the rate with which the ED-initiated BUP innovation is adopted and how well it is sustained. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan McCormack | NYU Langone Health | 2122632862 | Ryan.McCormack@nyulangone.org |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 24, 2020 | Feb 14, 2023 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Aug 17, 2021 | Feb 10, 2023 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009293 | Opioid-Related Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000079524 | Narcotic-Related Disorders |
| D019966 | Substance-Related Disorders |
| D064419 | Chemically-Induced Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
The outcome will be calculated using the following formula: (ED-initiated, not admitted) /All candidates who were not admitted |
| Up to Month 12 |
| Percent of Participants Who Received ED-Initiated BUP | The outcome will be calculated using the following formula: (ED-initiated, all) / [All discharged candidates + (ED-initiated, not discharged)] | Up to Month 12 |
| Percent of Participants Who Received ED-Initiated/Expedited BUP | The outcome will be calculated using the following formula: (ED-initiated/expedited, all) / [All discharged candidates + (ED-initiated/expedited, not discharged)] | Up to Month 12 |
| Change in Number of Days of Opioid and/or Other Drug Use as Assessed by Timeline Followback (TLFB) Assessment | The TLFB assessment will elicit the participant's self-reported use of illicit substances over the previous 7 days. At the Day 30 follow-up visit the assessment period will be the 7 days preceding the Day 30 post index ED visit. | Baseline, Day 30 |
| Change in Number of Self-Reported Opioid-Related Overdose Events | Participants will be asked to report the number of opioid-related overdose events experienced in the past 30 days through a self-report form. | Baseline, Day 30 |
| New York |
| New York |
| 10016 |
| United States |
| BG001 | Patients Identified Via Chart Review | Patients who were identified via chart review. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Not all participants in the "Patients identified via Chart Review" arm had baseline Sex data collected. Thus, the total number of participants analyzed for each of these sections is less than the overall number of baseline participants. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Not all participants in the "Patients identified via Chart Review" arm had baseline ethnicity data collected. Thus, the total number of participants analyzed for each of these sections is less than the overall number of baseline participants. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Not all participants in the "Patients identified via Chart Review" arm had baseline race data collected. Thus, the total number of participants analyzed for each of these sections is less than the overall number of baseline participants. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
Patients who were identified via chart review.
|
|
| Primary | Percent of Participants Who Received ED-Initiated/Expedited BUP Who Were Confirmed to be Engaged in Formal Addiction Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) on the 30th Day Following Discharge | The outcome will be calculated using the following formula: (participants who are confirmed to be engaged in formal addiction treatment for Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) on the 30th day following discharge / total number of participants who received ED-initiated/expedited BUP). | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | Day 30 Post-Discharge (Up to Month 12) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percent of Discharged Participants Who Received ED-Initiated BUP | The outcome will be calculated using the following formula: [(ED-initiated, discharged) + (ED-expedited, discharged)] / All candidates who were discharged | The overall number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure (n=1281) represents individuals identified via retrospective chart review and data matching for all adult emergency department (ED) patients identified to have nonmedical opioid use presenting to the ED during the IF, Post-IF or Maintenance periods. This outcome was not assessed among participants in the ED patients arm. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | Up to Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percent of Not-Admitted Participants Who Received ED-Initiated BUP | The outcome will be calculated using the following formula: (ED-initiated, not admitted) /All candidates who were not admitted | The overall number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure (n=1317) represents individuals identified via retrospective chart review and data matching for all adult emergency department (ED) patients identified to have nonmedical opioid use presenting to the ED during the IF, Post-IF or Maintenance periods. This outcome was not assessed among participants in the ED patients arm. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | Up to Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percent of Participants Who Received ED-Initiated BUP | The outcome will be calculated using the following formula: (ED-initiated, all) / [All discharged candidates + (ED-initiated, not discharged)] | The overall number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure (n=1310) represents individuals identified via retrospective chart review and data matching for all adult emergency department (ED) patients identified to have nonmedical opioid use presenting to the ED during the IF, Post-IF or Maintenance periods. This outcome was not assessed among participants in the ED patients arm. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | Up to Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percent of Participants Who Received ED-Initiated/Expedited BUP | The outcome will be calculated using the following formula: (ED-initiated/expedited, all) / [All discharged candidates + (ED-initiated/expedited, not discharged)] | The overall number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure (n=1489) represents individuals identified via retrospective chart review and data matching for all adult emergency department (ED) patients identified to have nonmedical opioid use presenting to the ED during the IF, Post-IF or Maintenance periods. This outcome was not assessed among participants in the ED patients arm. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | Up to Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Number of Days of Opioid and/or Other Drug Use as Assessed by Timeline Followback (TLFB) Assessment | The TLFB assessment will elicit the participant's self-reported use of illicit substances over the previous 7 days. At the Day 30 follow-up visit the assessment period will be the 7 days preceding the Day 30 post index ED visit. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Days | Baseline, Day 30 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Number of Self-Reported Opioid-Related Overdose Events | Participants will be asked to report the number of opioid-related overdose events experienced in the past 30 days through a self-report form. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Overdose events | Baseline, Day 30 |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 39 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| EG001 | Patients Identified Via Chart Review | Patients who were identified via chart review. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|