Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| N66001-17-2-4011 | Other Grant/Funding Number | Naval Information Warfare Center, Pacific |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency | FED |
| The University of Texas at Dallas | OTHER |
| University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Texas Biomedical Device Center at UT Dallas has developed an innovative strategy to enhance recovery of motor and sensory function after neurological injury termed targeted plasticity therapy (TPT). This technique uses brief pulses of vagus nerve stimulation to engage pro-plasticity neuromodulatory circuits during rehabilitation exercises. Recovery is associated with neural plasticity in spared motor networks in the brain and spinal cord. Moreover, an early feasibility study and an independent, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in chronic stroke participants indicate that VNS is safe in participants with upper limb deficits, and yields a clinically-significant three-fold increase in neural connections during rehabilitation exercises. Given the track record of safety and potential for VNS to enhance recovery of upper limb motor function in spinal cord injured individuals, the purpose of this double blind randomized placebo controlled optional open-label extension study is to assess the safety of using a new device to deliver vagus nerve stimulation to reduce symptom severity in participants with SCI. Additionally, the study will assess the prospective benefit of the system and garner an initial estimate of efficacy for a subsequent trial. Participants may undergo additional sessions of training with VNS.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate Start Vagus Nerve Stimulation group | Experimental | The Immediate Start VNS group will receive rehabilitation and active stimulation for 18 in-office sessions over the course of approximately 6 weeks during phase 1. For phase 2, all subjects will be provided the option to participate in an open-label extension consisting of an additional 18 sessions of in-office rehabilitation with active VNS over the course of approximately 6 weeks. Participants that elect to continue in the open-label extension will be assessed approximately 1 week after the conclusion of the additional 18 sessions of therapy. |
|
| Delayed Start Vagus Nerve Stimulation group | Placebo Comparator | The Delayed Start VNS group will receive equivalent rehabilitation with placebo stimulation for 18 in-office sessions over the course of approximately 6 weeks during phase 1. For phase 2, all subjects will be provided the option to participate in an open-label extension consisting of an additional 18 sessions of in-office rehabilitation with active VNS over the course of approximately 6 weeks. Participants that elect to continue in the open-label extension will be assessed approximately 1 week after the conclusion of the additional 18 sessions of therapy. |
|
| Follow-On Study Group | Experimental | The Follow-On Study group will receive up to 112 rehabilitative sessions with active VNS over the course of approximately 36 weeks after completion of Phase II. Participants will be provided with a system of rehabilitative devices to utilize at home. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active Vagus Nerve Stimulation | Device | Stimulation of the vagus nerve that is paired with upper extremity rehabilitation. VNS stimulation as described in the current study consists of 0.5 s trains of 0.8 mA 100 µs biphasic pulses delivered at 30 Hz. Stimulation trains are delivered only during rehabilitation. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Adverse Events [Device Safety] | Review of adverse events reported throughout the trial will be used to inform the potential risks associated with the ReStore system and provide a better understanding of risk/benefit analysis. | Week 1, 4, 6,7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Restore System Feasibility during Rehabilitation | If stimulation delivery is successful during the active portion of therapy sessions then the system is feasible to use. The primary endpoint will be: greater than 50% of the valid attempts to stimulate are successful per the ReStore system log. | Weeks 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
In order to be eligible to participate in this study, an individual must meet all of the following criteria:
Exclusion Criteria
An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Kilgard, PhD | The University of Texas at Dallas | Principal Investigator |
| Robert Rennaker, PhD | The University of Texas at Dallas | Principal Investigator |
| Seth Hays, PhD | The University of Texas at Dallas | Study Director |
| Jane Wigginton, MD | University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Rita Hamilton, DO | Baylor Scott & White Institute for Rehabilitation | Principal Investigator |
| Michael Foreman, MD FACS | Baylor Health Care System | Study Director |
| Mark Powers, PhD | Baylor Health Care System | Study Director |
| Richard Naftalis, MD, FAANS, FACS | Baylor Health Care System | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baylor University Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | 75246 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24891012 | Background | Biering-Sorensen F, Bryden A, Curt A, Friden J, Harvey LA, Mulcahey MJ, Popovic MR, Prochazka A, Sinnott KA, Snoek G. International spinal cord injury upper extremity basic data set. Spinal Cord. 2014 Sep;52(9):652-7. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.87. Epub 2014 Jun 3. | |
| 16909143 | Background | Catz A, Itzkovich M, Tesio L, Biering-Sorensen F, Weeks C, Laramee MT, Craven BC, Tonack M, Hitzig SL, Glaser E, Zeilig G, Aito S, Scivoletto G, Mecci M, Chadwick RJ, El Masry WS, Osman A, Glass CA, Silva P, Soni BM, Gardner BP, Savic G, Bergstrom EM, Bluvshtein V, Ronen J. A multicenter international study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: Rasch psychometric validation. Spinal Cord. 2007 Apr;45(4):275-91. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101960. Epub 2006 Aug 15. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013119 | Spinal Cord Injuries |
| D010291 | Paresis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013118 | Spinal Cord Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D020196 | Trauma, Nervous System |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055536 | Vagus Nerve Stimulation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004599 | Electric Stimulation Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
| Wings for Life |
| OTHER |
Double blind, randomized placebo controlled, optional open-label extension design
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Placebo Vagus Nerve Stimulation | Device | During Phase 1 of the study, the placebo group will receive a minimal amount of stimulation that fails to sufficiently activate the nerve, unknown to the participant and therapists. All participants will receive active stimulation during the Phase 2 open-label portion of the study. |
|
|
| Quantitative Force and Range of Motion Assessment | This is a physical assessment of upper limb changes in force/torque as a result of VNS paired rehabilitation. The primary endpoints will be: 10% increase in finger pinch and flexion force following active VNS, 10% increase in wrist flexion and extension force following active VNS, and 10% increase in wrist pronation and supination force following active VNS. This will serve as an efficacy measurement to use as basis for estimate of sample size for a pivotal trial. | Week 1, 6, 13, 20 |
| Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension (GRASSP) | Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension (GRASSP) is a measure used for spinal cord injury patients. The measure includes five subsets of questions designed to quantitatively measure clinical upper limb impairment (Kalsi-Ryan et al., 2012). The primary endpoint will be: >4 point shift in GRASSP assessment following active VNS. This will serve as an efficacy measurement to use as basis for estimate of sample size for a pivotal trial. | Week 1, 6, 13, 20 |
| Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test | Seven-item test of hand functions commonly used in activities of daily living (Jebsen et al, 1969). The items tested include range of fine motor, weighted and non-weighted hand function activities. The primary endpoint will be: 10% improvement in time to complete JTHF test following VNS therapy | Week 1, 6, 13, 20 |
| 15609737 | Background | Corson K, Gerrity MS, Dobscha SK. Screening for depression and suicidality in a VA primary care setting: 2 items are better than 1 item. Am J Manag Care. 2004 Nov;10(11 Pt 2):839-45. |
| 21228773 | Background | Engineer ND, Riley JR, Seale JD, Vrana WA, Shetake JA, Sudanagunta SP, Borland MS, Kilgard MP. Reversing pathological neural activity using targeted plasticity. Nature. 2011 Feb 3;470(7332):101-4. doi: 10.1038/nature09656. Epub 2011 Jan 12. |
| 24309259 | Background | Hays SA, Rennaker RL, Kilgard MP. Targeting plasticity with vagus nerve stimulation to treat neurological disease. Prog Brain Res. 2013;207:275-99. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63327-9.00010-2. |
| 17852230 | Background | Itzkovich M, Gelernter I, Biering-Sorensen F, Weeks C, Laramee MT, Craven BC, Tonack M, Hitzig SL, Glaser E, Zeilig G, Aito S, Scivoletto G, Mecci M, Chadwick RJ, El Masry WS, Osman A, Glass CA, Silva P, Soni BM, Gardner BP, Savic G, Bergstrom EM, Bluvshtein V, Ronen J, Catz A. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: reliability and validity in a multi-center international study. Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Dec 30;29(24):1926-33. doi: 10.1080/09638280601046302. Epub 2007 Mar 5. |
| 5788487 | Background | Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969 Jun;50(6):311-9. No abstract available. |
| 21568688 | Background | Kalsi-Ryan S, Beaton D, Curt A, Duff S, Popovic MR, Rudhe C, Fehlings MG, Verrier MC. The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension: reliability and validity. J Neurotrauma. 2012 Mar 20;29(5):905-14. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1504. Epub 2011 Aug 12. |
| 22330108 | Background | Kirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, Donovan W, Graves DE, Jha A, Johansen M, Jones L, Krassioukov A, Mulcahey MJ, Schmidt-Read M, Waring W. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). J Spinal Cord Med. 2011 Nov;34(6):535-46. doi: 10.1179/204577211X13207446293695. No abstract available. |
| 11556941 | Background | Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. |
| 24469147 | Background | Widerstrom-Noga E, Biering-Sorensen F, Bryce TN, Cardenas DD, Finnerup NB, Jensen MP, Richards JS, Siddall PJ. The International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set (version 2.0). Spinal Cord. 2014 Apr;52(4):282-6. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.4. Epub 2014 Jan 28. |
| 6880820 | Background | Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. |
| 40399668 | Derived | Kilgard MP, Epperson JD, Adehunoluwa EA, Swank C, Porter AL, Pruitt DT, Gallaway HL, Stevens C, Gillespie J, Arnold D, Powers MB, Hamilton RG, Naftalis RC, Foreman ML, Wigginton JG, Hays SA, Rennaker RL. Closed-loop vagus nerve stimulation aids recovery from spinal cord injury. Nature. 2025 Jul;643(8073):1030-1036. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09028-5. Epub 2025 May 21. |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |