Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study evaluates the pain score numerical rating, after sciatic analgesic continuous block, in patients with ischemic pain before surgery of limb revascularization. All patients received those blocks to control ischemic severe pain.
Peripheral Obstructive Arterial Disease (PAD) is a disease with a prevalence of 10 to 25% in the population over 55 years, increasing with age, and may have disabling pain as a symptom, and sometimes the surgical approach is required. In the context of public hospital in Rio de Janeiro, where patients need to wait for surgery, the Anesthesiology and Acute Pain service routinely has sciatic nerve analgesic block in the popliteal region as a preoperative procedure.
The primary objective of the present study is to describe a series of cases where the technique was applied in order to relieve the pain of these patients, following the Pain Score Numerical rating as a reference. Secondary objectives will be to describe difficulties associated with the technique and possible associated adverse factors.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| change in numerical pain scale | Numerical Pain Scale (END) self-assessed by the patient before and after 24 hours of continuous analgesic block of the sciatic nerve, with infusion of levobupivacaine 0,125% or ropivacaine 0,2%. The scale score is 0-10 (0= no pain; 10 = pain as bad as can be) | 24 hours after placement of sciatic catheter |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| change in numerical pain scale | Numerical Pain Scale (END) self-assessed by the patient before and after 72 hours of continuous analgesic block of the sciatic nerve, with infusion of levobupivacaine 0,125% or ropivacaine 0,2%. The scale score is 0-10 (0= no pain; 10 = pain as bad as can be) | 72 hours after placement of sciatic catheter |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with lower limb isquemic pain caused by peripheral arterial disease in the preoperative period.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rafael M Linhares | Rio de Janeiro | 22776050 | Brazil |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25116132 | Background | Luiten WE, Schepers T, Luitse JS, Goslings JC, Hermanides J, Stevens MF, Hollmann MW, van Samkar G. Comparison of continuous nerve block versus patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain and outcome after talar and calcaneal fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Nov;35(11):1116-21. doi: 10.1177/1071100714546640. Epub 2014 Aug 12. | |
| 25362748 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016491 | Peripheral Vascular Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| classification of technique difficulties |
To report, qualitatively, the presence of variations or difficulties in the use of the technique, such as: failure of the technique (FT); existence of concomitant venous analgesia (VA); inadequate registration of the technique (IR) |
| 72 hours after placement of sciatic catheter |
| classifications of possible complications | Report, qualitatively, the presence of possible complications, such as: hyperemia of the catheter insertion site (HC); the presence of pus (PUS); catheter displacement (CD) | 72 hours after placement of sciatic catheter |
| Thomas K, Barrett B, Tupper R, Dacenko-Grawe L, Holm K. Pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a case-control study of continuous nerve block therapy. Orthop Nurs. 2014 Sep-Oct;33(5):268-76. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0b013e3182879bd9. |
| 21377070 | Background | Gelfand HJ, Ouanes JP, Lesley MR, Ko PS, Murphy JD, Sumida SM, Isaac GR, Kumar K, Wu CL. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: a meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2011 Mar;23(2):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.12.005. |
| 15949910 | Background | Compere V, Cornet C, Fourdrinier V, Maitre AM, Duparc F, Biga N, Dureuil B. [Evaluation of continuous nerve block for postoperative pain management in orthopaedic surgery]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2005 Jul;24(7):795-801. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2005.04.025. French. |
| 28214338 | Background | Aubuchon A, Arnold WD, Bracewell A, Hoyle JC. Sciatic neuropathy due to popliteal fossa nerve block. Muscle Nerve. 2017 Oct;56(4):822-824. doi: 10.1002/mus.25622. Epub 2017 Jun 6. |
| 28918661 | Background | Dingemans SA, de Ruiter KJ, Birnie MFN, Goslings JC, van Samkar G, Schepers T. Comparable Postoperative Pain Levels Using 2 Different Nerve Blocks in the Operative Treatment of Displaced Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Dec;38(12):1352-1356. doi: 10.1177/1071100717730337. Epub 2017 Sep 16. |
| 27442676 | Background | Kim NY, Lee KY, Bai SJ, Hong JH, Lee J, Park JM, Kim SH. Comparison of the effects of remifentanil-based general anesthesia and popliteal nerve block on postoperative pain and hemodynamic stability in diabetic patients undergoing distal foot amputation: A retrospective observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(29):e4302. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004302. |
| 27366104 | Background | Dao T, Amaro-Driedger D, Mehta J. Successful treatment of Raynaud's syndrome in a lupus patient with continuous bilateral popliteal sciatic nerve blocks: a case report. Local Reg Anesth. 2016 Jun 15;9:35-7. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S97111. eCollection 2016. |
| 27871587 | Result | Joshi G, Gandhi K, Shah N, Gadsden J, Corman SL. Peripheral nerve blocks in the management of postoperative pain: challenges and opportunities. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Dec;35:524-529. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.041. Epub 2016 Oct 20. |