Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Clinimark, LLC | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Clinical Investigation Plan: Vital USA SpO2 Accuracy Comparison to Arterial Blood CO-Oximetry Study ID# PR 2019-353, Version: Rev 1, Date: 15 Oct 2019 Study Dates: November 4-5, 2019
An SpO2 accuracy comparison was conducted as part of the final validation of the VitalDetect™ pulse oximetry system. The study was conducted in accordance to Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) for Non-Significant Risk (NSR) investigational studies, following International Standards Organization (ISO) 14155:2011 as appropriate and the pulse oximetry guidelines of ISO 80601-2-61:2017 applicable sections, and Pulse Oximeters - Premarket Notifications Submissions [510(k)s] Guidance For Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (issued: March 4, 2013).
The purpose of this study was to validate the SpO2 accuracy of the VitalDetect™ pulse oximetry system during non-motion conditions over the range of 70-100% SaO2 as compared to arterial blood samples assessed by CO-Oximetry. It was expected that the Accuracy Root Mean Square (ARMS) performance of the oximetry system would meet the required specification of ARMS of 3.0% or less.
A secondary goal was to evaluate the pulse rate performance simultaneously collected over the SpO2 range covered. The Pulse Rate Accuracy Root Mean Square (Arms) performance of the VitalDetect™ pulse oximetry system, were expected to meet a specification of 3 bpm.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARMS SpO2 70-100% | Experimental | Comparison to Reference CO-Oximetry |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy of the VitalDetect™ pulse oximetry system | Device | The purpose of this study was to validate the SpO2 accuracy of the VitalDetect™ pulse oximetry system during non-motion conditions over the range of 70-100% SaO2 as compared to arterial blood samples assessed by CO-Oximetry. It was expected that the Accuracy Root Mean Square (ARMS) performance of the oximetry system would meet the required specification of ARMS of 3.0% or less. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate SpO2 Accuracy Per Standards for Pulse Oximetry. | This study was a comparative, single-center, non-randomized study conducted to evaluate the SpO2 accuracy per standards and guidelines identified above for SpO2 accuracy for pulse oximetry equipment over the range of 70-100% SaO2 under non-motion conditions. Arterial blood sampling measured by functional SaO2 CO-Oximetry, was used as the basis for comparison. As a secondary goal, the pulse rate accuracy was compared to ECG Heart Rate realized over the range throughout the hypoxia procedure. Testing was conducted under normal office environment conditions. | 90 Seconds |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Pulse Rate Accuracy Compared to ECG Heart Rate. | The pulse rate accuracy was compared to ECG Heart Rate as recorded by the S5 Multi-parameter monitor. Passing criteria was an ARMS of 3 bpm or better based measurements observed during the pulse oximetry evaluation. | 90 Seconds |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Subject is considered as being morbidly obese (defined as BMI >39.5).
Compromised circulation, injury, or physical malformation of fingers, wrist, hands, ears or forehead/skull or other sensor sites which would limit the ability to test sites needed for the study. (Note: Certain malformations may still allow subjects to participate if the condition is noted and would not affect the particular sites utilized.)
Female subjects that are actively trying to get pregnant or are pregnant (confirmed by positive urine pregnancy test unless the subject is known to be not of child-bearing potential).
Smoker Subjects who have refrained will be screened for COPD levels >3% as assessed with a Radical 7 (Rainbow)
Subjects with known respiratory conditions such as: (self-reported):
Subjects with known heart or cardiovascular conditions such as: (self-reported, except for blood pressure and ECG review)
Self-reported health conditions as identified in the Health Assessment Form (self-reported)
Subjects with known clotting disorders (self-reported)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Arthur Ruiz, MD | Avista Adventist Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinimark Laboratory Services | Louisville | Colorado | 80027 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Following Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval Title: "Vital USA SpO2 Accuracy Comparison to Arterial Blood CO-Oximetry", Clinimark Study ID# PR 2019-353, eleven healthy adult volunteer subjects were screened and enrolled into the study. One subject was withdrawn due to poor device placement and time sync with the control oximeter.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | ARMS SpO2 70-100% | Comparison to Reference CO-Oximetry Accuracy of the VitalDetect™ pulse oximetry system: The purpose of this study was to validate the SpO2 accuracy of the VitalDetect™ pulse oximetry system during non-motion conditions over the range of 70-100% SaO2 as compared to arterial blood samples assessed by CO-Oximetry. It was expected that the Accuracy Root Mean Square (ARMS) performance of the oximetry system would meet the required specification of ARMS of 3.0% or less. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
10 Healthy volunteer subjects of five (5) males and five (5) females ages 19-38 years, weight 105-228 lbs, height 63-75 inches, and BMI 18 - 34.7. Two (2) Black/ African Americans, one (1) Asian, and seven (7) White. Nine (9) Non-Hispanic/Non-Latino and one (1) Hispanic / Latino.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | ARMS SpO2 70-100% | Comparison to Reference CO-Oximetry Accuracy of the VitalDetect™ pulse oximetry system: The purpose of this study was to validate the SpO2 accuracy of the VitalDetect™ pulse oximetry system during non-motion conditions over the range of 70-100% SaO2 as compared to arterial blood samples assessed by CO-Oximetry. It was expected that the Accuracy Root Mean Square (ARMS) performance of the oximetry system would meet the required specification of ARMS of 3.0% or less. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Evaluate SpO2 Accuracy Per Standards for Pulse Oximetry. | This study was a comparative, single-center, non-randomized study conducted to evaluate the SpO2 accuracy per standards and guidelines identified above for SpO2 accuracy for pulse oximetry equipment over the range of 70-100% SaO2 under non-motion conditions. Arterial blood sampling measured by functional SaO2 CO-Oximetry, was used as the basis for comparison. As a secondary goal, the pulse rate accuracy was compared to ECG Heart Rate realized over the range throughout the hypoxia procedure. Testing was conducted under normal office environment conditions. | Five (5) males, five (5) females (age: 19-38yrs, weight: 105-228 lbs, height: 63-75", BMI: 18.0-34.7). Race ethnicity, two (2) Black / African-Americans, one (1) Asian, seven (7) White. Nine (9) Non-Hispanic / Non-Latino, one (1) of Hispanic /Latino. Skin pigmentation ranged from light to dark meeting the requirement of at least 2 darkly pigmented | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percent | 90 Seconds |
|
up to 15 days after the completion of the study
All subjects completed the study without incidence.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | ARMS SpO2 70-100% | Comparison to Reference CO-Oximetry Accuracy of the VitalDetect™ pulse oximetry system: The purpose of this study was to validate the SpO2 accuracy of the VitalDetect™ pulse oximetry system during non-motion conditions over the range of 70-100% SaO2 as compared to arterial blood samples assessed by CO-Oximetry. It was expected that the Accuracy Root Mean Square (ARMS) performance of the oximetry system would meet the required specification of ARMS of 3.0% or less. No Adverse events reported |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark H Khachaturian, PhD | Vital USA Inc. | +1(561)282-6074 | mark.khachaturian@vvvital.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 5, 2019 | Feb 23, 2020 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Testing was conducted under normal office environment conditions. The VitalDetect™ pulse oximetry was placed on the right index finger of all subjects to evaluate the SpO2 and pulse rate accuracy performance during steady state non-motion conditions. A Control Pulse Oximetry system was also placed on the subject to evaluate the stability of the draws and the real time oxygen saturation status. The subject was in a reclined position and connected to a breathing circuit, for administering medical grade oxygen and nitrogen. The gas flow delivery was adjusted for subject comfort. Arterial blood samples were drawn during simultaneous data collection from the control pulse oximeter and the test oximeters. The blood was immediately analyzed by Reference CO-Oximetry providing functional SpO2 for the basis of the SpO2 accuracy comparison. The pulse rate for the VitalDetect™ was compared to Reference ECG Heart Rate collected during the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Participants |
| No |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Skin tone | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | Lbs |
|
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | inches |
|
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
|
| ARMS SpO2 70-100% |
Comparison to Reference CO-Oximetry |
|
|
| Secondary | The Pulse Rate Accuracy Compared to ECG Heart Rate. | The pulse rate accuracy was compared to ECG Heart Rate as recorded by the S5 Multi-parameter monitor. Passing criteria was an ARMS of 3 bpm or better based measurements observed during the pulse oximetry evaluation. | Five (5) males, five (5) females (age: 19-38yrs, weight: 105-228 lbs, height: 63-75", BMI: 18.0-34.7). Race / ethnicity, two (2) Black / African-Americans, one (1) Asian, seven (7) White. Nine (9) Non-Hispanic / Non-Latino, one (1) Hispanic /Latino. Skin pigmentation / tones met requirement of at least 2 darkly pigmented or 15 % of the subject pool | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percent | 90 Seconds |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 10 |
| 0 |
| 10 |
| 0 |
| 10 |
Not provided