Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Melanoma of the eye (ocular/uveal melanoma) is an uncommon type of cancer that is associated with a high mortality. It usually disseminates rapidly throughout the body, most commonly to the liver and lungs. In this study a combination therapy with immunotherapy (ipilimumab with nivolumab) and chemotherapy (melphalan) will be assessed for the treatment of disseminated uveal melanoma. Melphalan will be administered selectively to the liver via percutaneous hepatic perfusion, limiting the systemic effect of chemotherapy. With this treatment combination we aim to find a treatment for disseminated uveal melanoma, both in the liver as in the other organs.
Uveal melanoma (UM) is an uncommon malignancy (0.6-0.7 cases/100.000/year) that, in the case of metastatic stage, has a poor prognosis for response to treatment and survival. It is remarkable for its purely hematogenous pattern of dissemination, most commonly to the liver (60%) and lungs (25%). Current approaches using percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) with melphalan resulted in response rates of up to 40% in the liver (1, 2) (for results of our own phase II study see paragraph 6.3.2). However, a main part of the patients developed extrahepatic disease in the follow-up, whereas the liver metastases were mainly stable.
Checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to improve overall survival in metastasized cutaneous melanoma in phase III studies (3-6), but seem to have limited activity as monotherapies in metastasized uveal melanoma (7-9). The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab has achieved 2 out of 6 patients PR in a retrospective analysis (10). Interestingly, both patients had a liver-directed therapy (SIRT and chemoembolization) before the immunotherapy.
Combination of radio-frequency ablation (RFA) and anti-CTLA-4 enhanced antigen-loading of dendritic cells, and induced long-lasting anti-tumor immune responses in a murine melanoma model without induction of any severe side effects (11, 12). A phase Ib/II trial by Blank et al. (13) showed unconfirmed responses in some patients when RFA was combined with ipilimumab in uveal melanoma, but long-term disease stabilization was not achieved. Most of the responses were seen in extrahepatic metastases. Combining percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) with checkpoint inhibitors could together lead to control of hepatic and extrahepatic disease. Therefore, we propose the current trial: Phase1b/2 Study Combining Hepatic Percutaneous Perfusion with Ipilimumab plus Nivolumab in advanced Uveal Melanoma (CHOPIN).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase Ib | Experimental |
| |
| Phase II - Combination treatment | Active Comparator |
| |
| Phase II - PHP | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab and nivolumab | Drug | The effect of ipilimumab and nivolumab has previously been tested in metastatic uveal melanoma. In this study the combination with percutaneous hepatic perfusion will be performed in order to evaluate the effect. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Toxicity and safety of treatment | Dose limiting toxicities, maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase dose of the combination ipilimumab/nivolumab and PHP in patients with unresectable, histologically confirmed hepatic metastasis of uveal melanoma in phase Ib part. | 36 weeks |
| Efficacy and safety | Description of PFS according to RECIST 1.1 at one year in the PHP group versus PHP + ipilimumab/nivolumab group in the phase II part. | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Response rate | Description of response rate and overall survival, overall clinical response, and duration of response | 1 year |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ellen W. Kapiteijn, MD, PhD | Leiden University Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leiden University Medical Center | Leiden | South Holland | 2333 ZA | Netherlands |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41785896 | Derived | van den Hoek L, Burgmans M, Tong T, Goeman J, Speetjens F, Zunder S, van Erkel A, van der Meer R, van Rijswijk C, Lutjeboer J, Koolhaas D, Jonker-Bos M, Roozen I, Kropff S, van Meerten EVP, Zoethout R, Sitsen E, Helmerhorst H, Tijl F, Blank C, Kapiteijn E. Percutaneous hepatic perfusion combined with ipilimumab and nivolumab for metastatic uveal melanoma (CHOPIN): a single-centre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2026 Mar;27(3):372-382. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00720-X. | |
| 35152908 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000098943 | Uveal Melanoma |
| D009362 | Neoplasm Metastasis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008545 | Melanoma |
| D018358 | Neuroendocrine Tumors |
| D017599 | Neuroectodermal Tumors |
| D009373 | Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000074324 | Ipilimumab |
| D000077594 | Nivolumab |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D061067 | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized |
| D000911 | Antibodies, Monoclonal |
| D000906 | Antibodies |
| D007136 | Immunoglobulins |
Not provided
Not provided
In the phase 1b part, safety and feasibility of combining percutaneous hepatic perfusion with 4 courses of ipilimumab and nivolumab will be investigated. In the randomized phase 2 part, efficacy as measured by progression-free survival at one year comparing PHP only versus PHP plus ipilimumab/nivolumab will be evaluated.
Not provided
Not provided
Open label, single center, phase Ib/randomized phase II trial, evaluating the safety and efficacy (as measured by RECIST 1.1) of the combination of PHP and ipilimumab/nivolumab in patients with unresectable hepatic and extrahepatic metastases of uveal melanoma.
Not provided
| Melphalan chemosaturation via percutaneous hepatic perfusion | Drug | The effect of ipilimumab and nivolumab has previously been tested in metastatic uveal melanoma. In this study the combination with percutaneous hepatic perfusion will be performed in order to evaluate the effect. |
|
| Derived |
| Tong TML, van der Kooij MK, Speetjens FM, van Erkel AR, van der Meer RW, Lutjeboer J, van Persijn van Meerten EL, Martini CH, Zoethout RWM, Tijl FGJ, Blank CU, Burgmans MC, Kapiteijn E. Combining Hepatic Percutaneous Perfusion with Ipilimumab plus Nivolumab in advanced uveal melanoma (CHOPIN): study protocol for a phase Ib/randomized phase II trial. Trials. 2022 Feb 13;23(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06036-y. |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D009380 | Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue |
| D018326 | Nevi and Melanomas |
| D014604 | Uveal Neoplasms |
| D005134 | Eye Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
| D014603 | Uveal Diseases |
| D009385 | Neoplastic Processes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D007162 |
| Immunoproteins |
| D001798 | Blood Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D012712 | Serum Globulins |
| D005916 | Globulins |