Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is the gold standard method to stage axilla in breast cancer. The aim of the study is to compare the efficiency of various methods to identify SLN is breast cancer patients.
Various markers has been used for SLN biopsy including isosulfan blue (patent blue), indocyanine green (ICG), radioisotope colloid (RAIC) and ultrasound (US) with several advantages and disadvantages. In this study investigators designed an algorithm using the combination of mapping with patent blue, ICG, RAIC and US to compare the accurate identification of SLN in breast cancer patients. The protocol is based on the hypothesis that identification rate of SLN is increased with multiple agents. Patent blue and ICG provides visual guidance. The combination of dyes with sonographic and RAIC method have the potential to prevent obstacles and ensure better outcomes as an identification strategy.
Patent blue provides visual identification of the SLN. ICG fluorescence can be detected percutaneously and by means of fluorescence imaging system in real time. RAI has several advantages, but disadvantages as well, like cost and invisibility. RAI can only be detected and confirmed by means of sound and numerical value through gamma probe. All breast cancer patients underwent axillary ultrasound before SLNB with different mapping combinations. The determination of abnormal axillary lymph node was followed by ultrasound-guided FNA cytology of these nodes. The sonographic abnormality criteria of the nodes were defined as; completely hypoechoic node, asymmetric focal hypoechoic node, cortical lobulation more than 3, cortical thickness >2mm, totally spheric appearance, absence of fatty hilum and compromise of normal vascularity (hypervascularization from various poles). Patients with negative results of FNA would undergo SLNB. Lymphatic mapping was performed with abovementioned dyes and radioactive colloid. Before the incising for SLNB real time intraoperative US was performed and suspicious axillary lymph nodes were seen by ultrasound guidance. In the SLNB operation, radioactive or dyed nodes and sonographically suspicious nodes were removed and labeled separately for pathological examination.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAI+PB+US | Active Comparator | Sentinel lymph node mapping with dual tracer (radioisotope and patent blue) and intraoperative ultrasound to identify SLN in the breast cancer patients |
|
| RAI+ICG+US | Experimental | Sentinel lymph node mapping with dual tracer (radioisotope and ICG) and intraoperative ultrasound to identify SLN in the breast cancer patients |
|
| RAI+PB+ICG+US | Experimental | Sentinel lymph node mapping with triple tracer (radioisotope,ICG and patent blue) and intraoperative ultrasound to identify SLN in the breast cancer patients |
|
| PB+ICG+US | Experimental | Sentinel lymph node mapping with triple tracer (ICG and patent blue) and intraoperative ultrasound to identify SLN in the breast cancer patients |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sentinel lymph node biopsy | Procedure | Sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) procedure with different mapping methods using combination of radioactive colloid, patent blue, indocyanine green associated with intraoperative ultrasound. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Identification rate of sentinel lymph node | The ability to identify a sentinel lymph node successfully with different mapping techniques | During operation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Average number of excised sentinel lymph nodes | The effect of mapping technique on the number of excised nodes | Histological report expected within an average of 2 weeks after sentinel lymph node biopsy |
| False-negative rate of axillary US |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guldeniz Karadeniz Cakmak, MD | Contact | 05323371860 | gkkaradeniz@yahoo.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Güldeniz Karadeniz Cakmak, MD | Bülent Ecevit University Department of Surgery | Study Chair |
| Rabiye Uslu Erdemir, MD | Bülent Ecevit University Department of Nucleer Medicine | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bülent Ecevit University | Recruiting | Zonguldak | 67600 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D021701 | Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001706 | Biopsy |
| D003581 | Cytodiagnosis |
| D003584 | Cytological Techniques |
| D019411 | Clinical Laboratory Techniques |
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective, single-center, randomized study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
False negative rate for SLN surgery in women with normal or axillary US and at least 2 SLNs were excised, defined as the number of patients with no positive lymph nodes by SLN and with at least one positive lymph node by axillary lymph node dissection divided by the total number of patients with at least one positive lymph node by SLN or ALND multiplied by 100, or vise versa. For abnormal axillary US, false negative rate is calculated similarly.
| Histological report expected within an average of 2 weeks after sentinel lymph node biopsy |
| Morbidity | Lymphedema, shoulder movement pain, or functional deformity after SLNB with different mapping techniques will be assessed by clinicians during follow-up with 3 months periods. The result will be the percentage of patients which suffer from some complications after SLNB or AD. Common morbidity rate after AD is 20%, after SLNB 1-2%. | 36 months |
| Hakan Bakkal, MD | Bülent Ecevit University Department of Radiation Oncology | Principal Investigator |
| Hüseyin Engin, MD | Bülent Ecevit University Department of Clinical Oncology | Principal Investigator |
| D017437 |
| Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D019937 |
| Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D013048 | Specimen Handling |
| D003949 | Diagnostic Techniques, Surgical |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D008197 | Lymph Node Excision |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |