A Randomized, Double-masked, Phase 3 Study of ABP 938 Efficacy and Safety Compared to Aflibercept (Eylea®) in Subjects With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
A Randomized, Double-masked, Phase 3 Study of ABP 938 Efficacy and Safety Compared to Aflibercept (Eylea®) in Subjects With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of ABP 938 versus Aflibercept (Eylea®) in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Subjects will be randomized in a masked 1:1 ratio to receive 2 mg (0.05 mL) of either ABP 938 (Treatment Group A) or aflibercept (Treatment Group B) administered by intravitreal (IVT) injection.
Approximately 566 subjects will be randomized in approximately 126 global sites.
This study consists of a screening period of up to 4 weeks, after which subjects will receive investigational product for 48 weeks, followed by a safety follow-up period to week 52, for a total study duration of up to 56 weeks.
Subjects will be randomized in a masked 1:1 ratio to receive 2 mg (0.05 mL) of either ABP 938 (Treatment Group A) or aflibercept (Treatment Group B) administered by IVT injection.
At week 8, subjects will be assessed for the primary endpoint. The primary endpoint is the change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) as measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter score from baseline to week 8, in order to assess the efficacy of ABP 938 compared to aflibercept.
Subjects will then be re-randomized at week 16 in a masked fashion such that:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects are excluded if they meet any of the following criteria in the study eye:
Subjects are excluded if they meet any of the following criteria in either eye:
Other Medical Conditions
• Active extraocular infection or history of extraocular infections as follows: A. any active infection for which systemic anti-infectives were used within 4 weeks before randomization B. recurrent or chronic infections or other active infection that, in the opinion of the investigator, might cause this study to be detrimental to the subject
Washouts and Nonpermitted Treatments
General
Ústí nad Labem, Ústí Nad Labem 401 13, Czechia
Shatin, New Territories, 000000, Hong Kong
Budapest, 1076, Hungary
Haifa, Southern District 3104802, Israel
Perugia, Umbria 06129, Italy
Milan, 20122, Italy
México DF, Mexico City 04030, Mexico
Seoul, Seoul Teugbyeolsi 06591, South Korea
Seoul, Seoul Teugbyeolsi 3080, South Korea
LHospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona 8097, Spain