Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to evaluate the impact of research climate on PhD students' research practice (i.e., an environment where their peer (i.e., a post-doc researcher) had detrimental practice in a similar situation)
PhD students are the next generation of researchers and will present the field in the future. However, several environmental factors might influence their research practice. In this study, the investigators will evaluate the impact of research climate on PhD students' research practice (exposure to an environment where their peers commit a detrimental practice).
Objective: To evaluate the impact of research climate on PhD students' research practice
Design: A randomized controlled trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vignette with research climate | Experimental | Participants in this arm will receive vignettes describing a dilemma situation in research (e.g adding honorary author) with additional sentence describing research climate (i.e. an environment where their peer had detrimental practice in a similar situation) |
|
| Vignette without research climate | Active Comparator | Participants in this arm will receive vignettes describing a dilemma situation in research without the additional sentence describing research climate |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vignette with emphasis on research climate | Other | A vignette describing a dilemma situation for a researcher (e.g. adding an honorary author) with or without a research environment factor (i.e. an environment where other researchers commit detrimental research practice) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| mean preference score | In each vignette, participants will have to indicate which solution they prefer on a semantic differential scale, rated from - 5 to -1 (preference for solution A) and from 1 to 5 (preference for solution B). | Immediate assessment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| proportion of students who chose the detrimental research practice (DRP) | Proportion of students rated from -5 to -1 for the DRP. | Immediate assessment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isabelle BOUTRON, Pr | Contact | +33 (0)1.42.34.78.33 | isabelle.boutron@aphp.fr |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre d'Epidémiologie Clinique, hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris | Paris | 75181 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37773192 | Derived | Nguyen VT, Sharp MK, Superchi C, Baron G, Glonti K, Blanco D, Olsen M, Vo Tat TT, Olarte Parra C, Neveol A, Hren D, Ravaud P, Boutron I. Biomedical doctoral students' research practices when facing dilemmas: two vignette-based randomized control trials. Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 29;13(1):16371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42121-1. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Nov 27, 2023 | |
| Reset | May 3, 2024 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
It is not possible to blind participants to the intervention. However, participants will be blinded to the study hypothesis.
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2023 | May 3, 2024 |