Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to evaluate the influence of supervisors on PhD students' research practice (i.e., an environment where there is a lack of opposition to detrimental research practice from the supervisor)
PhD students are the next generation of researchers and will present the field in the future. However, several environmental factors might influence their research practice. In this study, we will evaluate the influence of supervisors on PhD students' research practice (an environment where there is a lack of opposition to detrimental research practice from the supervisor).
Objective: To evaluate the influence of supervisors on PhD students' research practice
Design: A randomized controlled trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vignette with supervisor's opinion | Experimental | Participants in this arm will receive vignettes with an additional sentence describing supervisor's opinion (i.e. supervisor does not oppose to detrimental research practice) |
|
| Vignette without supervisor's opinion | Active Comparator | Participants in this arm will receive vignettes without an additional sentence describing supervisor's opinion. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vignette with emphasis on supervisor's opinion | Other | A vignette describing a dilemma situation for a researcher (e.g. adding an honorary author) with or without the description of supervisor's advice that does not oppose to detrimental research practice (i.e. the supervisor is fine with whatever the PhD student decides in the dilemma). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean preference score | In each vignette, we will ask participants, what would you do if you are in the place of the character in the vignette? Participants will have to indicate which solution they prefer on a semantic differential scale, rated from - 5 to -1 (preference for solution A) and from 1 to 5 (preference for solution B). We will calculate the mean preference score | Immediate assessment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of students who chose the detrimental research practice | Proportion of students who made choices rated from -5 to -1 | Immediate assessment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isabelle Boutron, Professor | Contact | +33 (0)1.42.34.78.33 | isabelle.boutron@aphp.fr |
Not provided
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37773192 | Derived | Nguyen VT, Sharp MK, Superchi C, Baron G, Glonti K, Blanco D, Olsen M, Vo Tat TT, Olarte Parra C, Neveol A, Hren D, Ravaud P, Boutron I. Biomedical doctoral students' research practices when facing dilemmas: two vignette-based randomized control trials. Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 29;13(1):16371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42121-1. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Nov 27, 2023 | |
| Reset | May 3, 2024 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2023 | May 3, 2024 |