A Randomized, Multi-center, Open-label, Phase III Trial of Fulvestrant Versus Capecitabine as Maintenance Therapy After First-line Chemotherapy in Patients With Hormone Receptor Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (FAMILY)
A Randomized, Multi-center, Open-label, Phase III Trial of Fulvestrant Versus Capecitabine as Maintenance Therapy After First-line Chemotherapy in Patients With Hormone Receptor Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (FAMILY)
This phase III trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of fulvestrant or capecitabine as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative metastatic breast cancer.
Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is incurable. Although first-line endocrine therapy is preferred to hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) MBC, chemotherapy may be reserved as the initial treatment for patients with rapid clinical progression, life-threatening visceral metastases, and need for rapidly symptom control. Either prolonged chemotherapy or endocrine therapy may be used as maintenance after disease control. However, which maintenance strategy is superior in terms of delaying disease progression as well as maintaining quality of life (QOL) remains uncertain. This phase III trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of fulvestrant or capecitabine as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy in HR+/HER2- MBC.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Cannot be grouped if any of the following is true:
yaoherui@mail.sysu.edu.cn+86 13500018020
wuwenjing@mail.sysu.edu.cn+86 15902045077
Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, China
Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, China
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
Zhangjiang, Guangdong, China
yaoherui@mail.sysu.edu.cn+86 13500018020