Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Augusta Victoria Hospital, East Jerusalem | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will test the feasibility of a carbohydrate-restricted, high-fat (CRHF) diet intervention in newly diagnosed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients who will receive definitive radiation.
Our previous observational research indicates that a pretreatment diet high in total carbohydrates is associated with increased risk of all-cause and disease-specific mortality in head and neck cancer. The purpose of this study is to conduct a single-blinded randomized controlled trial to test the feasibility of a carbohydrate-restricted, high-fat (CRHF) diet intervention in newly diagnosed head and neck cell squamous carcinoma (HNSCC) patients who will receive definitive radiation. The secondary aim is to collect preliminary data on the effect of the intervention on tumor progression, nutritional status, body composition, quality of life, and symptom burden.
Thirteen newly diagnosed HNSCC non-metastatic patients were recruited from Augusta Victoria Hospital in East Jerusalem and randomized into one of two arms; a carbohydrate-restricted, high-fat diet arm (arm A) and a regular diet composition arm (Arm B). Arm A (N=6) were provided a CRHF diet both neoadjuvantly (for 2 weeks prior to treatment) and adjuvantly (during treatment with radiation). Arm B (N=7) received standard oncologic treatment including a regular diet (50-52% carbohydrates, 30% fats, and 18-20% proteins). Feasibility outcomes, including recruitment, retention, intervention adherence, and safety were tracked weekly. Biomarkers, tumor progression, nutritional status, body composition, QOL, and symptoms were assessed at baseline, 2-weeks, and 2-3 months post-treatment. A control group (N=26) included HNSCC patients who follow the same applicable eligibility criteria and did not receive any kind of dietary intervention. Medical information were collected retrospectively from the control group patients' files. Information on demographics (age, sex, smoking status, weight, height, marital status, education, occupation, and residency), tumor site, cancer stage, treatment dose reduction, treatment break, early cessation of treatment, hospitalization, symptoms, and weight loss, were collected during treatment from arms A and B and retrospectively from the control group.
This proposed pilot/feasibility study is the first step in determining if a CRHF diet is an effective treatment modality in cancer and if providing a diet with any composition before and during treatment is more beneficial than not providing a diet at all.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Experimental | The experimental arm (N=6) were provided a CRHF diet with enough calories to maintain body weight for appoximately 2 weeks neoadjuvantly (during radiotherapy preparation) and adjuvantly during primary oncology treatment for ~6.5 weeks. The CRHF diet was composed of 45% fats (mostly) unsaturated fats, 25% proteins, and 30% carbohydrates. |
|
| Arm B | Active Comparator | Arm B (N=7) were provided a regular composition diet prescribed with enough calories to maintain body weight for approximately 2 weeks neoadjuvantly (during radiotherapy preparation) and adjuvantly during primary oncology treatment for ~6.5 weeks. The regular composition diet was composed of ~50-52% carbohydrates, ~30% fats, and 18-20% proteins, |
|
| Control group | No Intervention | The control group (N=26) followed applicable eligibility criteria but did not receive any intervention. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbohydrate-restricted, high-fat diet | Behavioral | Diet composition was ~45% fats, ~30% carbohydrates, and ~25% proteins. Calorie needs were provided according to what the Bioelectrical Impedance (BIA) device gave as required to maintain bodyweight. Sources of macronutrients:
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility measure: Recruitment | Recruitment will be measured by recording the number of patients screened, included, excluded, dropped-out, and completed the study throughout the study period. | Through study completion, an average of 2 years |
| Feasibility measure: Adherence | Adherence will be measured by collecting daily food surveys that ask about daily food intake (checking the food items that have been consumed and providing information about any other additional foods that were consumed) as well as completing all study activities which are listed on a checklist. | Throughout the 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study) |
| Feasibility measure: Retention | Retention will be measured by recording the number of patients included or agreed to participate and completed all study protocol. | Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study) |
| Blood Glucose | Blood glucose level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high. | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
| Complete blood count (CBC) | CBC levels were measured, recorded, and mentioned whether levels were normal, low, or high. | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
| Liver function | Liver function tests were measured, recorded, and mentioned whether levels were normal, low, or high. These tests were done to assess whether liver function remained normal after consuming the diet or not. That was done by measuring the levels of GOT, GPT, and alkaline phosphatase in the blood and recording whether they were normal or not. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Tumor progression assessment | Tumor progression was assessed using RECIST and WHO criteria as well as diagnostic CTScan/ PETScan imaging. | Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study) |
| Nutritional status assessment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Anna E Arthur, PhD, MPH | University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Augusta Victoria Hospital | East Jerusalem | Palestinian Territories |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29604042 | Background | Arthur AE, Goss AM, Demark-Wahnefried W, Mondul AM, Fontaine KR, Chen YT, Carroll WR, Spencer SA, Rogers LQ, Rozek LS, Wolf GT, Gower BA; University of Michigan Head and Neck SPORE Program. Higher carbohydrate intake is associated with increased risk of all-cause and disease-specific mortality in head and neck cancer patients: results from a prospective cohort study. Int J Cancer. 2018 Sep 1;143(5):1105-1113. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31413. Epub 2018 Apr 17. | |
| 41542842 |
Not provided
Not provided
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Randomized controlled trial
Not provided
Not provided
Participants will be blinded from the group they are assigned to.
|
|
| Regular composition diet | Behavioral | The regular composition diet contained approximately 50-52% carbohydrates, 30% fats, and 18-20% proteins |
|
| Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
| Kidney function | Kidney function tests were measured, recorded, and mentioned whether levels were normal, low, or high. These tests were done to assess whether kidney function remained normal after consuming the diet or not. That was done by measuring the levels of BUN, creatinine, and uric acid in the blood and recording whether they were normal or not. | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
| Potassium | Potassium level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high. | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
| Phosphorus level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high. | Phosphorus | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
| Magnesium | Magnesium level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high. | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
| Sodium | Sodium level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high. | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
| Chloride | Chloride level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high. | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
| Calcium | Calcium level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high. | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
| Albumin level | Albumin level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high. | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
| C-reactive protein (CRP) level | CRP level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high. High level indicates inflammation. | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
| Total protein level | Total protein level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high. | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
| Insulin level | Insulin level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high. | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
| Triglycerides level | Triglycerides levels were measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the levels were normal, low, or high. | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
| Total cholesterol level | Total cholesterol level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high. | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
| LDL-cholesterol level | LDL-cholesterol level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high. | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
| HDL-cholesterol level | HDL-cholesterol level was measured, recorded, and mentioned whether the level was normal, low, or high. | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
Nutritional status was assessed using the "Patient generated subjective global assessment" (PG-SGA) tool.
| Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study) |
| Percentage of body fat | The percentage of body fat was measured by using a Bioelectric Impedance Analysis (BIA) device and used to study the effect of the intervention on body composition. | Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study) |
| Percentage of lean body mass | The percentage of lean body mass was measured by using a Bioelectric Impedance Analysis (BIA) device and used to study the effect of the intervention on body composition. | Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study) |
| Percentage of body water | The percentage of body water was measured by using a Bioelectric Impedance Analysis (BIA) device and used to study the effect of the intervention on body composition. | Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study) |
| Basal metabolic rate (BMR) | BMR was measured by using a Bioelectric Impedance Analysis (BIA) device and used to study the effect of the intervention on body composition. | Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study) |
| Quality of life assessment | Quality of life was assessed using EORTC QLQ questionnaires. | Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study) |
| Symptom burden assessment | Symptom burden was assessed using the validated Memorial Symptom Assessment Survey. | Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study) |
| Hospitalization | We recorded whether the participant was hospitalized or not. | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
| Number of hospitalizations | If the participant was hospitalized, we recorded the number of hospitalizations | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
| Duration of hospitalization | If the participant was hospitalized, we recorded the duration of each hospitalization | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of intervention |
| Weight loss | We recorded whether the participant had weight loss or not | Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study) |
| Amount and span of weight loss | If the participant had weight loss, we recorded how much he had lost and during what time span | Throughout 16.5 week study period (from baseline till the end of study) |
| Treatment dose reduction | We recorded whether there was treatment dose reduction and the reason for that. | Throughout the 6.5 weeks of treatment |
| Treatment break | We recorded whether there was treatment break and the reason for that. | Throughout the 6.5 weeks of treatment |
| Early cessation of treatment | We recorded whether there was early cessation of treatment and the reason for that. | Throughout the 8.5 weeks of treatment |
| Derived |
| Taha HM, Holscher HD, Atrash F, Slade AN, Maino Vieytes CA, Pan YX, Arthur AE. Medically Tailored Meals During Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutr Cancer. 2026;78(3):233-246. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2025.2608398. Epub 2026 Jan 16. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077195 | Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002294 | Carcinoma, Squamous Cell |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D006258 | Head and Neck Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059305 | Diet, High-Fat |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004032 | Diet |
| D009747 | Nutritional Physiological Phenomena |
| D000066888 | Diet, Food, and Nutrition |
| D010829 | Physiological Phenomena |
Not provided
Not provided