Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background: Recently, an increasing international interest has arisen in using morbidity and mortality rates to monitor the quality of hospital cares (1, 2). Many hospitals have integrated the morbidity and mortality review (MMR) meetings into their governance processes, by making them mandatory and more accountable for taking corrective action (3-5).
Quality of radiotherapy (RT) delivery is highly operator dependent. The operator is a team of professionals including radiation oncologists, planning dosimetrists, physicists and technicians. Because of this complex, multi-step process, there is margin for error, which may affect outcomes and toxicity. Some deviations may have minimal effects on outcome, while others may have a profound effect and compromise long-term results. For the morbidity after RT, MMR is identified as one of the most adapted process to highlight whether and how these meetings provide assurance within the organizations' governance processes in radiation departments.
In France, many teams have not reached a formalized procedure for a systematic MMR. Furthermore, implementation of MMR in RT departments is very heterogeneous and not always meets the criteria defined by the Health Authorities (HAS) (6).
Systemic analysis conducted during the MMR is a comprehensive analysis of the situation, taking into account all technical and human elements. The diagnosis and type of morbidity depends on the irradiated volume, the dose delivered to the organ at risk and the individual radiosensitivity.
Follow-up after RT is important to evaluate outcome results and late toxicity. In general, late effects consist of tissue fibrosis and vascular damage, which can result in cosmetic and functional deterioration. Some of the radiation-induced sequelea may require particular management including hospitalization (lung fibrosis, gastro-intestinal and genito-urinary toxicities,..), while for other ones, only local treatments are needed (mucosal toxicity, skin fibrosis…). The challenge for clinicians in the frame of the MMR is to make sure that there is no controversy about the delivered RT quality and investigate other potential causes such as particular intrinsic radiosensitivity of the patient for a given standard treatment.
The study consist of a prospective registration in a dedicated database (PROUST) of severe radiation toxicity that aims to implement MMR procedure in the French radiotherapy departments.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients with severe radiation toxicity | Other | Patients who received radiotherapy and developed abnormal radiation-induced toxicity |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morbidity Mortality Review (MMR) | Other |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Database of MMR boards | The PROUST national database of MMR boards, will be an opportunity to structure data collection on severe and durable radiation toxicity with an objective evaluation taking into account individual radiosensitivity. | at 3 Months |
| Database of MMR boards | The PROUST national database of MMR boards, will be an opportunity to structure data collection on severe and durable radiation toxicity with an objective evaluation taking into account individual radiosensitivity. | at 6 Months |
| Database of MMR boards | The PROUST national database of MMR boards, will be an opportunity to structure data collection on severe and durable radiation toxicity with an objective evaluation taking into account individual radiosensitivity. | at 9 Months |
| Database of MMR boards | The PROUST national database of MMR boards, will be an opportunity to structure data collection on severe and durable radiation toxicity with an objective evaluation taking into account individual radiosensitivity. | at 12 Months |
| Database of MMR boards | The PROUST national database of MMR boards, will be an opportunity to structure data collection on severe and durable radiation toxicity with an objective evaluation taking into account individual radiosensitivity. | at 24 Months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Radiation toxicity | The rating scale NCI/CTCAE v4.03 will be used to differentiate between major and minor complications. Only major complications (grade > 3) will be included in the database. | at Day 0 |
| Associated treatments to radiation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yazid BELKACEMI, MD, PhD | Contact | (0)149814522 | + 33 | yazid.belkacemi@aphp.fr |
| David SCHMITZ | Contact | (0) 1 49 81 36 24 | + 33 | david.schmitz@aphp.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Yazid BELKACEMI, MD, PhD | Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Datas are own by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, please contact sponsor for further information
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011832 | Radiation Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
All drugs used either administered concurrently or sequentially with RT will be recorded
| at Day 0, 3 Months, 6 Months, 9 Months,12 Months, 15 Months, 18 Months, 21 Months and 24 Months |
| Follow-up and management strategy | Patients included in the database will have a planned follow-up every 3 to 6 months after inclusion during at least 2 years.The follow-up will be adjusted according to institution policy of the oncologic follow-up in case of regression of the clinical symptoms of toxicity. | at Day 0, 3 Months, 6 Months, 9 Months,12 Months, 15 Months, 18 Months, 21 Months and 24 Months |
| Evolution of life's quality | The evaluation of the quality of life will be conducted using the Short-Form 36 questionnaire. This generic scale contains 36 items divided into eight dimensions, each corresponding to a different aspect of health and for a comprehensive assessment of the quality of life. | at Day 0, 3 Months, 6 Months, 9 Months,12 Months, 15 Months, 18 Months, 21 Months and 24 Months |