Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The enrolment was prematurely terminated after the planned monitoring of the first 5 patients because of an unacceptable level of relevant toxicities, according to statistical stopping rules and the DSMB recommendation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
FIL_Dara-GDP is a phase II, open label, multicenter clinical trial. The sponsor of this clinical trial is Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL). The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of 4 courses of D-GDP (Daratumumab in combination with Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, Dexamethasone) in terms of complete response in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) and other nodal lymphomas of T follicular helper cells (TFH cells) origin refractory/relapsed after at least one and no more than two previous lines of therapy.
This is an open-label, multicenter, single arm, single-stage phase II trial. After the patient signs the written informed consent the patient will enter the screening phase planning baseline assessments and a concomitant upfront confirmation of diagnosis of Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Not Otherwise Specified (PTCL-NOS), Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) or Nodal Lymphoma of T Follicular Helper cells (TFH cells) origin and a central evaluation of immunohistochemical positivity of CD38 (cluster of differentiation 38) on bioptic material used to perform local diagnosis of relapsed disease, or that used for the more recent biopsy in the case of refractory patients. A core needle biopsy is considered sufficient for review and CD38 evaluation. Evaluation at central laboratory can be performed in bone marrow sections in those patients with only bone marrow lymphoma infiltration.
Only patients with confirmed eligible diagnosis and a percentage of CD38 positive tumor cells ≥ 5% will be considered eligible for study treatment.
The treatment consists of an induction phase and a maintenance phase.
Induction phase:
4-6 courses (according to response after cycle 4 and to patient compliance) of D-GDP (Daratumumab in combination with Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, Dexamethasone) every 21 days pursuant to the following schedule:
Otherwise, patients in Complete Remission (CR) will enter the maintenance phase at this point of the study.
Patients in Partial Remission (PR) (not eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplantation) or in Stable Disease (SD) after D-GDP x 4 cycles can receive 2 additional courses of D-GDP before maintenance or can move directly to maintenance, according to center choice (based on patient condition, performance status and quality of response).
Patients who respond (Complete Remission/Partial Remission) after 6 courses of induction phase (end of induction, EOI) and eligible to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) will be addressed to allo-SCT consolidation.
Patients who respond to the induction phase (Complete Remission/Partial Remission) and are not eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) and patients in stable disease (SD) at the End Of Induction (EOI), will move to the maintenance phase.
Patients in Progressive disease (PD) at any time will discontinue treatment, as well as patients experiencing at any time unacceptable toxicity.
Maintenance phase:
starting 28 days after the beginning of cycle 4 or 6 (or, in case of toxicity grade > 1, after toxicity is resolved) and up to 24 cycles from start of D-GDP (Daratumumab in combination with Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, Dexamethasone) according to the following schedule:
• Daratumumab 16 mg/kg single administration every 28 days
Treatment with D-GDP (Daratumumab in combination with Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, Dexamethasone) or daratumumab single agent will be discontinued before completion of 24 cycles in case of:
Safety monitoring and stopping rules:
In order to monitor the safety and the activity of the treatment in small cohorts of patients, the Bayesian approach of Thall et al. (1995), as extended by Thall and Sung (1998) will be used.
Monitoring of relevant toxicity after 4 cycles of D-GDP (Daratumumab in combination with Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, Dexamethasone) will be done to ensure that it is not higher than an acceptable toxicity of 30% (as defined in the safety endpoints) and the monitoring of activity after 4 cycles of D-GDP (Daratumumab in combination with Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, Dexamethasone) will be done to ensure that Complete Remission (CR) proportion is not lower than 40%.
The prior probability of toxicity and activity are modeled by beta distributions [Beta (0.6,1.4) and Beta (0.8,1.2), respectively].
The enrolment will be stopped if the posterior probability of the treatment being more toxic or less active than expected is greater than 95%.
The primary efficacy analysis will be performed after enrolment of 35 patients. The primary efficacy analysis will consist of an estimate of Complete Remission Rate (CRR) on the efficacy population after 4 cycles of D-GDP (Daratumumab in combination with Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, Dexamethasone) therapy, with 90% confidence intervals (according to 1-sided alpha error of 0.05). To conclude that the new treatment is promising, the minimum number of patients with a Complete Remission (CR) is 12/35.
The time-to-event functions (Overall Survival (OS) and Progression Free Survival (PFS)) will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method.
Subgroup analyses on primary efficacy parameter (Complete Remission Rate (CRR)) will be performed to assess the role of daratumumab maintenance and to explore potential prognostic role of CD38 expression. A logistic regression model will be used and the effect (Complete Remission Rate (CRR)) and its 95% Interval of Confidence (CI) will be presented.
For safety analysis, both at patient level and at therapy cycle level, summaries of incidence rates (frequencies and percentages) and intensity of individual adverse events by CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)) v. 5.0 will be reported.
The results of this study will support the rationale of a phase III randomized trial if both efficacy and safety endpoints will be considered promising.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daratumumab-GDP | Experimental | This is an open-label, multicenter, single arm, single-stage phase II trial. After the patient signs the written informed consent the patient will enter the screening phase planning baseline assessments and a concomitant upfront confirmation of diagnosis of PTCL-NOS, AITL or nodal lymphoma of TFH cell origin and a central evaluation of immunohistochemical positivity of CD38 on bioptic material used to perform local diagnosis of relapsed disease, or that used for the more recent biopsy in the case of refractory patients. A core needle biopsy is considered sufficient for review and CD38 evaluation. Evaluation at central laboratory can be performed in bone marrow sections in those patients with only bone marrow lymphoma infiltration. Only patients with confirmed eligible diagnosis and a percentage of CD38 positive tumor cells ≥ 5% will be considered eligible for study treatment. The treatment consists of an induction phase and a maintenance phase. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daratumumab | Drug | Daratumumab in combination with Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone and Cisplatin (D-GDP). Induction phase: 4-6 courses (according to response after cycle 4 and to patient compliance) of D-GDP every 21 days pursuant to the following schedule: Daratumumab cycle 1: 8 mg/kg i.v. on day 2 and on day 9; cycle 2-6: 16 mg/kg i.v. on day 2 and day 9) Gemcitabine 1000 mg/sm i.v. day 1 and day 8 (gemcitabine on day 8 to be skipped in case of grade 3-4 toxicity) Cisplatin 75 mg/sm i.v. day 1 Dexamethasone 40 mg i.v. or po days 1-2-3-4-9 G-CSF from day 3 to 6, and from day 10 to 13 (to be prolonged if necessary) Maintenance: starting 28 days after the beginning of cycle 4 or 6 (or, in case of toxicity grade > 1, after toxicity is resolved) and up to 24 cycles from start of D-GDP according to the following schedule: Daratumumab 16 mg/kg single administration every 28 days. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Complete Response Rate (CRR) | The Complete Response Rate is defined as the percentage of patient in Complete Remission (according to Lugano classification response Criteria). It will be assessed after the first 4 cycles of D-GDP chemotherapy. In case of early discontinuation, efficacy will be assessed at the End Of Treatment (EOT) visit. Patients without response assessment (due to whatever reason) will be considered as non-responders. CR: complete radiological response, no extralymphatic sites, no new lesions, organ enlargement regress to normal and normal morphology of bone marrow; PR: >=50% decrease of sum of the product of perpendicular diameter of up to 6 dominant, measurable nodes and and extranodal sites. | the endpoint will be assessed from the start date of therapy to the end of the first four cycles of therapy (cycles of 21 days). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Response Rate (ORR) | Overall Response Rate is defined as the percentage of patients in complete remission or in partial remission (according to the Lugano 2014 criteria) after the first 4 cycles of therapy (cycles of 21 days). Patients without response assessment (due to whatever reason) will be considered as non-responders. CR: complete radiological response, no extralymphatic sites, no new lesions, organ enlargement regress to normal and normal morphology of bone marrow; PR: >=50% decrease of sum of the product of perpendicular diameter of up to 6 dominant, measurable nodes and and extranodal sites. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Role of Daratumumab Maintenance | Comparison between the Complete Remission Rate (CRR), percentage of patient in complete remission, before and after maintenance therapy | The endpoint will be assessed at each restaging through study completion, up to 26 months. |
| Role of Daratumumab Maintenance CR vs PR |
Inclusion Criteria:
• Histologically documented diagnosis of CD38 (cluster of differentiation 38) positive PTCL-NOS, AITL and other nodal lymphomas of TFH cell origin as defined in the 2017 edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Patients with only bone marrow involvement are eligible.
Note: Only patients with a centrally assessed percentage of CD38 positive tumor cells ≥ 5% in the relapse biopsy, or in the more recent biopsy in the case of refractory patients, will be considered eligible for protocol study treatment.
Age 18-70 years
Relapsed or refractory to one previous lines of treatment (autologous transplantation as a consolidation to the first line of therapy should not be considered a second line)
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) < 2
At least one site of measurable nodal disease at baseline ≥ 2.0 cm in the longest transverse diameter as determined by CT scan (MRI is allowed only if CT scan cannot be performed). Note: Patients with only bone marrow involvement are eligible
Adequate hematological counts defined as follows:
Adequate renal function defined as follows:
- Creatinine clearance ≥ 40 mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault formula)
Adequate hepatic function per local laboratory reference range as follows:
Subject understands and voluntarily signs an informed consent form approved by an Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), prior to the initiation of any screening or study-specific procedures
Subject must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements
Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
Women must be:
Men must agree to use an acceptable method of contraception (for themselves or female partners as listed above) for the duration of the study. Men must agree to use a double barrier method of birth control and to not donate sperm during the study and for 3 months after receiving the last dose of study drug.
Male even if surgically sterilized (i.e., status post vasectomy) must agree to 1 of the following:
Exclusion Criteria:
Histological diagnosis different from CD38 positive PTCL-NOS, AITL, and other nodal lymphomas of TFH cell origin
More than two lines of previous treatment (autologous stem cell transplant performed as part of consolidation to a previous line of therapy should not be considered as a line of therapy)
Previous treatment with Gemcitabine or Platinum based regimens; patients who received a single course of Platinum based course (i.e. DHAP) are not excluded
Prior therapy with monoclonal antibody anti CD38 (against cluster of differentiation 38)
Concomitant experimental therapy
Relapse after allo SCT
Central nervous system (CNS) involvement with lymphoma
Subject has received any anti-cancer therapy including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, investigational therapy, including targeted small molecule agents within 14 days prior to the first dose of study drug
Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) requiring treatment
Subject is:
Cardiovascular disease (NYHA class ≥2)
Creatinine Clearance < 40 mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault formula)
Significant history of neurologic, psychiatric, endocrinological, metabolic, immunologic, or hepatic disease that would preclude participation in the study or compromise ability to give informed consent
Any history of other active malignancies within 3 years prior to study entry, with the exception of adequately treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix uterine, basal cell carcinoma of the skin or localized squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, previous malignancy confined and surgically resected with curative intent.
Uncontrolled and/or active systemic infection (viral, bacterial or fungal)
Evidence of any other clinically significant uncontrolled condition(s)
If female, the patient is pregnant or breast-feeding
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Francesco Zaja | S.C. Ematologia, Trieste - Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI) - SC Ematologia | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II - U.O.C Ematologia | Bari | 70124 | Italy | |||
| Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (I.R.S.T.) - Ematologia |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Study stopped after the enrollment of 8 patients over the planned 35.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | One Arm | Daratumumab in combination with Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone and Cisplatin (D-GDP) in patients with relapsed/refractory CD38 positive peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) and other nodal lymphomas of TFH cell origin. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | One Arm | Daratumumab in combination with Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone and Cisplatin (D-GDP) in patients with relapsed/refractory CD38 positive peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) and other nodal lymphomas of TFH cell origin. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Complete Response Rate (CRR) | The Complete Response Rate is defined as the percentage of patient in Complete Remission (according to Lugano classification response Criteria). It will be assessed after the first 4 cycles of D-GDP chemotherapy. In case of early discontinuation, efficacy will be assessed at the End Of Treatment (EOT) visit. Patients without response assessment (due to whatever reason) will be considered as non-responders. CR: complete radiological response, no extralymphatic sites, no new lesions, organ enlargement regress to normal and normal morphology of bone marrow; PR: >=50% decrease of sum of the product of perpendicular diameter of up to 6 dominant, measurable nodes and and extranodal sites. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | the endpoint will be assessed from the start date of therapy to the end of the first four cycles of therapy (cycles of 21 days). |
|
The endpoint was assessed after 26 months from the date of starting therapy in place of the planned 42 months, due the early interruption of the study
CTCAE
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | One Arm | Daratumumab in combination with Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone and Cisplatin (D-GDP) in patients with relapsed/refractory CD38 positive peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) and other nodal lymphomas of TFH cell origin. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Due early termination, only 8 patients were enrolled in the study. The study highlight a high level of toxicity of the experimental treatment.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prof. Francesco Zaja | SC Ematologia - Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI) - Trieste | + 39 040 3992015 | francesco.zaja@asugi.sanita.fvg.it |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 29, 2019 | Dec 19, 2023 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016399 | Lymphoma, T-Cell |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008228 | Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin |
| D008223 | Lymphoma |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C556306 | daratumumab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective, multicenter, single arm, single-stage phase II trial in patients with refractory/relapsed CD38 positive PTCL-NOS, AITL and TFH with centrally assessed CD38 expression ≥ 5%.
It is expected for the current trial that D-GDP will improve the CR rate to 40% with an absolute improvement of 20%, while the toxicity rate is maintained at 30%.
Sample size: A'Hern's Single-Stage Phase II design will be used. The sample size was calculated according to the primary efficacy endpoint. Based on literature, the null hypothesis that the true proportion of CR after four courses of D-GDP is 0.20 will be tested against an alternative CR proportion of 0.40 with an absolute improvement of 0.20, considered clinically promising with the experimental treatment. Assuming a type I error rate of 5% and a power of 80% when the CR proportion is 40% overall 35 patients will be accrued. The null hypothesis will be rejected if 12 or more CR out of 35 patients are observed after four courses of D-GDP.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| the endpoint will be assessed from the start date of therapy to the end of the first four cycles of therapy (cycles of 21 days) and at each restaging |
| Overall Survival (OS) | Overall Survival, the percentage of patients alive, is defined from the start date of therapy to the date of death from any cause. Patients alive and those who are lost to follow-up at the time of the final analysis will be censored at the date of the last contact. | The end point will be assessed from the start date of therapy up to 3 months. |
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | The length of time during and after the treatment that patients live with the disease, but it does not get worse. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) will be defined from the date of starting therapy and the date of disease progression, relapse or death from any cause. Responding patients, according to the Lugano classification response Criteria, and patients who are lost to follow-up will be censored at their last assessment date. | The endpoint will be assessed from the start date of therapy up to 3 months. |
| Toxicity - Frequency of Relevant Toxicities | Frequency of relevant toxicities. Toxicities will be classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0. This endpoint will be evaluated from the start date of therapy and at any time during therapy and follow-up. | the endpoint was assessed after 26 months from the date of starting therapy in place of the planned 42 months, due the early interruption of the study |
The evaluation of the rate of conversion in Complete Remission with daratumumab maintenance therapy for patients in Partial Remission after the induction. With this endpoint it will be measured the number of responses that will be converted from Partial Remission (PR) to Complete Remission (CR) in those patients that after induction therapy continued the treatment with the maintenance therapy. |
| The endpoint will be assessed at each restaging through study completion, up to 26 months. |
| Percentage of CD38 Expression in Correlation With the Response to the Treatment | This endpoint will evaluate the correlation between intensity of CD38 expression (percentage of expression) and response to the treatment. The extent of CD38 expression evaluated by the central designed laboratory of FIL (Fondazione Italiana Linfomi) will be performed on fresh sections cut from the paraffin block (or on unstained sections), and the percentage of positive tumor cells will be scored according to Bossard C. et al as follows: 4: >75%; 3: 50-75%; 2: 25-49%; 1: 5-24%; 0: <5%. The percentage of CD38 expression will be correlated with response measured according to the Lugano 2014 criteria | The endpoint will be assessed from the start date of therapy to the end of the first four cycle of therapy (cycles of 21 days) and at each restaging through study completion, up to 26 months. |
| Meldola |
| Forlì-Cesena |
| Italy |
| ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda - SC Ematologia | Milan | 20162 | Italy |
| A.O. Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello - Divisione di Ematologia | Palermo | 90146 | Italy |
| Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto - U.O.Ematologia | Piacenza | 29121 | Italy |
| A.O.U. Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - Ematologia Universitaria | Torino | 10126 | Italy |
| Trieste - Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI) - SC Ematologia | Trieste | 34121 Francesco | Italy |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Disease status at study entry | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Systemic B symptoms | Symptoms B: absence of systemic symptoms; systemic symptoms defined as Night sweating, fever or Weight loss. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ann Arbor Stage | Staging for lymphomas disease, ranging from I (disease located in single region) to IV (diffuse or disseminated involvement of one or more extralymphatic organs) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| ECOG Performance Status | ECOG Performance status: scale ranging from 0 (person fully active) to 5 (death) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Bone marrow involvement | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Number extra-nodal sites | Extranodal localization by CT scan or combined PET-CT (Magnetic Resonance Imaging if CT cannot be done). | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type of the 1st Line Treatment | CHOEP: cyclophosphamide doxorubicin vincristine Etoposide Prednisone DHAP: rituximab dexamethasone cytarabine cisplatin ASCT: autologous stem cell transplant ARA-C: cytarabine CHOP: cyclophosphamide doxorubicine vincristine prednisone COEP: cyclophosphamide etoposide vincristine prednisone HSCT: haematopoietic stem cell transplantation | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Overall Response Rate (ORR) | Overall Response Rate is defined as the percentage of patients in complete remission or in partial remission (according to the Lugano 2014 criteria) after the first 4 cycles of therapy (cycles of 21 days). Patients without response assessment (due to whatever reason) will be considered as non-responders. CR: complete radiological response, no extralymphatic sites, no new lesions, organ enlargement regress to normal and normal morphology of bone marrow; PR: >=50% decrease of sum of the product of perpendicular diameter of up to 6 dominant, measurable nodes and and extranodal sites. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | the endpoint will be assessed from the start date of therapy to the end of the first four cycles of therapy (cycles of 21 days) and at each restaging |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Overall Survival (OS) | Overall Survival, the percentage of patients alive, is defined from the start date of therapy to the date of death from any cause. Patients alive and those who are lost to follow-up at the time of the final analysis will be censored at the date of the last contact. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percent probability at 3 months | The end point will be assessed from the start date of therapy up to 3 months. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | The length of time during and after the treatment that patients live with the disease, but it does not get worse. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) will be defined from the date of starting therapy and the date of disease progression, relapse or death from any cause. Responding patients, according to the Lugano classification response Criteria, and patients who are lost to follow-up will be censored at their last assessment date. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percent probability at 3 months | The endpoint will be assessed from the start date of therapy up to 3 months. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Toxicity - Frequency of Relevant Toxicities | Frequency of relevant toxicities. Toxicities will be classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0. This endpoint will be evaluated from the start date of therapy and at any time during therapy and follow-up. | Monitoring planned after the first 5 patients treated. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | the endpoint was assessed after 26 months from the date of starting therapy in place of the planned 42 months, due the early interruption of the study |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Role of Daratumumab Maintenance | Comparison between the Complete Remission Rate (CRR), percentage of patient in complete remission, before and after maintenance therapy | Due the early interruption of the trial, this end point was not evaluated. | Posted | The endpoint will be assessed at each restaging through study completion, up to 26 months. |
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Role of Daratumumab Maintenance CR vs PR | The evaluation of the rate of conversion in Complete Remission with daratumumab maintenance therapy for patients in Partial Remission after the induction. With this endpoint it will be measured the number of responses that will be converted from Partial Remission (PR) to Complete Remission (CR) in those patients that after induction therapy continued the treatment with the maintenance therapy. | Due the early interruption of the trial, this end point was not evaluated. So, data were not collected. | Posted | The endpoint will be assessed at each restaging through study completion, up to 26 months. |
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Percentage of CD38 Expression in Correlation With the Response to the Treatment | This endpoint will evaluate the correlation between intensity of CD38 expression (percentage of expression) and response to the treatment. The extent of CD38 expression evaluated by the central designed laboratory of FIL (Fondazione Italiana Linfomi) will be performed on fresh sections cut from the paraffin block (or on unstained sections), and the percentage of positive tumor cells will be scored according to Bossard C. et al as follows: 4: >75%; 3: 50-75%; 2: 25-49%; 1: 5-24%; 0: <5%. The percentage of CD38 expression will be correlated with response measured according to the Lugano 2014 criteria | No data displayed because Outcome Measure has zero total participants analyzed. So, data were not collected. | Posted | The endpoint will be assessed from the start date of therapy to the end of the first four cycle of therapy (cycles of 21 days) and at each restaging through study completion, up to 26 months. |
|
|
| 8 |
| 8 |
| 8 |
| 8 |
| 8 |
| 8 |
| septic shock multiorgan failure | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Heart failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hepatorenal syndrome | Hepatobiliary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Thenth rib fracture | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| EBV infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Leukopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Febrile neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cardiac disorder | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastrointestinal disorder | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| General disorder | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hepatobiliary disorder | Hepatobiliary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Immuno system | Immune system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Infections | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Investigations | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Metabolism | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Renal and urinary | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Respiratory | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Other | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D008232 |
| Lymphoproliferative Disorders |
| D008206 | Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D007160 | Immunoproliferative Disorders |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| No relevant event |
|