Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy is a heterogeneous disease often associated with increased rates of sudden cardiac death. Although many algorithms have been proposed, risk stratification remains suboptimal, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are currently recommended only in patients with poor left ventricular function. However, most cases of sudden cardiac death occur at earlier stages, in patients with relatively preserved left ventricular function and exercise capacity, for which device-therapy is currently not indicated. Several noninvasive risk factors have been associated with increased arrhythmic risk, including clinical history (syncope), imaging (fibrosis on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and left ventricular dimensions in echocardiography) and electrocardiographic parameters (ventricular arrhythmic burden, late potentials, heart rate variability and repolarization abnormalities).
The investigators hypothesized that the encouraging findings of studies assessing more sophisticated stratification-algorithms in patients with ischemic heart disease could be extrapolated in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Thus, combining noninvasive risk factors with programmed ventricular stimulation may risk-stratify such patients more accurately. In this regard, the prospective observational multicenter ReCONSIDER study aims to integrate several approaches to arrhythmic risk stratification in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy in a tiered, multifactorial, approach, in which noninvasive risk factors are combined with electrophysiologic studies. This approach may pave the way for a more comprehensive risk stratification algorithm in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, leading to more rational device-therapy, and, ultimately to lower mortality.
Study hypothesis There is an urgent need for reconsidering risk stratification approaches to DCMP patients, in addition to LVEF in order to identify subgroups at high arrhythmic risk that could benefit from ICD. This task could be achieved either by imaging and/or noninvasive, ECG-related, risk stratification techniques. In this direction, the investigators recently introduced a two-step multifactorial, noninvasive ECG findings leading to programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS), electrophysiology study (EP)-inclusive approach, to modify and protect the truly high risk post-myocardial infarction (MI) CAD patients with a LVEF≥40%. Based on the fact that those DCMP patients inducible on PVS into sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/Vf) are the ones most likely to receive appropriate ICD therapy regardless of the degree of left ventricular contractile dysfunction or/and the presence of complex ventricular ectopy, the investigators now propose a similar two-step, multifactorial, noninvasive, EP-inclusive approach among the DCMP population with either relatively preserved (35%<LVEF≤50% - Group A) or reduced (LVEF≤35% - Group B) ventricular systolic function. The kernel of this approach lies in the premise that NIRFs detect arrhythmogenic potential and invasive PVS ascertains whether it translates to clinical arrhythmogenesis, combining the formers' sensitivity with the latter's specificity.
It is hypothesized that this approach will lead to i. Detection of a high risk subgroup among DCMP patients with 35%<LVEF≤50% that would benefit from an ICD in terms of total mortality (given that their non-SCD mortality component is low as they are at early heart failure stages with relatively preserved systolic function) ii. Stratification of the cohort with LVEF≤35% into clearly discernible arrhythmic risk level groups, with patients in the lowest one having a total mortality mostly due to heart-failure related death and potential ICD advantages negated by potential complications.
Population and methods ReCONSIDER is a multicenter, prospective observational trial, aiming to enroll DCMP patients in 17 major electrophysiology centers in Greece. Reimbursement for all devices will be provided by the Hellenic State. The study is under the auspices of the Hellenic Cardiology Society, in whose secure servers the online patient database will be maintained. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are described in the relevant sections.
A. Endpoints i. Primary endpoint: Major arrhythmic event (MAE) occurrence (ICD activation ± sudden cardiac death ± sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation) ii. Secondary endpoints: Mortality (all-cause and heart failure-related) - Heart failure-related hospitalization - Device related complications (including pocket and lead-related infections, as well as inappropriate therapies) B. Stratification and treatment i. NIRFs
Presence of the following NIRFs will be evaluated:
Measurements will consist of the end-diastolic and end-systolic right and left ventricular volumes, the ejection fraction of both ventricles, and will be provided by analysing cine-sequences performed on both ventricles. Endocardium and epicardium will be contoured both in end-diastole and end-systole to define end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and subsequently LV stroke volume, ejection fraction, and myocardial mass. All parameters will be indexed to body surface area.
Additionally, cardiac MRI studies will include late images after gadolinium infusion, using inversion recovery sequence, with late gadolinium-enhanced area expressed as percentage of the left ventricular mass. Presence of LGE in any extent will constitute a positive study in terms of NIRF presence. LGE localization and pattern will also be recorded for further analysis.
iii. Programmed ventricular stimulation protocol PVS protocol will consist of up to 3 extrastimuli being introduced from 2 different right ventricular sites, preferably the apex and outflow tract. These extrastimuli will follow a drive train consisting of 6 stimuli at 2 cycle lengths (550msec and 400msec) at the first site and at a single cycle length (400msec) at the second site. Coupling intervals between extrastimuli will be shortened by 10msec intervals until refractoriness or an interval of 200msec is reached - whichever occurs first. Additionally, once the procedure is completed,β-agonist infusion (isoproterenol) will commence at rates 1-4μg/min. Once baseline heart rate increases to >120bpm the protocol will be repeated, using 3 extrastimuli from a single site and with a driving train cycle length of 400msec. Patients will be considered inducible and the protocol terminated prematurely if monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT - either sustained - >30sec in duration - or requiring termination due to hemodynamic instability) or ventricular fibrillation (Vf) is induced at any stage.
iv. Patient Groups
Based on the above, 6 patient subgroups will be available for comparison:
vi. Follow up and statistics Based on previous studies (follow up of 46.9 months in the study by Gatzoulis et al and 55.2 months in the one by Halliday et al), a 4-year or 48-month follow up appears a reasonable choice. Patients will be assessed at enrolment, at 30 days and then at every 180 days, until censoring or follow up completion. Biventricular pacing percentage will be assessed in all CRT-device bearers (target >95%). Extra visits will be scheduled in cases of device activation and clinical events.
E. Power analysis i. Assumptions Thus, 60% of Group A patients are expected to have no NIRFs detected (Group 1-A), 30% to have at least one NIRF present yet be noninducible upon PVS (Group 2-A) and 10% to both have NIRF(s) present and be inducible. On the other hand, 10% of Group B patients are expected to both have no NIRFs and be noninducible (Group 1-B), 60% to have at least 1 NIRF while being noninducible (Group 2-B) and 30% to have both NIRF(s) present and be inducible (Group 3-B).
The investigators hypothesize a corresponding incidence of MAEs ranging from as high as 50% (Group 3-B, annual incidence 12.5%), down to 25% (Group 3-A, annual incidence 8.3% - similar to the 8.2% annual rate observed in the high risk cohort of the PRESERVE EF study), 10% (Group 2-B - annual incidence 2.5%) and even 0% (Groups 1-A, and 1-B), in the high, intermediate, and low risk groups, respectively.
ii. Sample size calculation Based on the above assumptions, power analysis suggests that, in order to achieve 80% power (β=0.2) at a significance level (α) of 0.05, with an allocation ratio [high risk subgroup to all group patients, i.e. subgroup 3:(1+2+3) of 0.1 for Group A patients (35%](streamdown:incomplete-link)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| LVEF between 35%-50%, no noninvasive risk factors (NIRFs) | No Intervention | Follow up, no further intervention | |
| LVEF between 35%-50%, NIRFs present, noninducible | No Intervention | Follow up, no further intervention | |
| LVEF between 35%-50%, NIRFs present, inducible | Active Comparator | All patients in this group will receive an ICD |
|
| LVEF <35%, no NIRFs present, noninducible | Sham Comparator | All patients in this group will receive an ICD, the aim is to compare major arrhythmic event occurrence according to NIRF presence and/or inducibility, and whether risk stratification accuracy can be improved as compared to classic approach of ICDs being offered to all dilated cardiomyopathy patients with LVEF<35% |
|
| LVEF <35%, NIRFs present, noninducible | Sham Comparator | All patients in this group will receive an ICD, the aim is to compare major arrhythmic event occurrence according to NIRF presence and/or inducibility, and whether risk stratification accuracy can be improved as compared to classic approach of ICDs being offered to all dilated cardiomyopathy patients with LVEF<35% |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) insertion | Device | Implantation of ICD when arrhythmic risk is deemed high in those with LVEF between 35%-50%, and to all with LVEF<35%. Aim to determine whether risk stratification accuracy can be improved more than that of the current approach regarding primary prevention of sudden cardiac arrhythmic death in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy patients (no ICDs to those with LVEF between 35%-50% and ICDs to all with LVEF <35%. In patients in the LVEF <35% groups, ICDs will be used as implantable recorders, to determine whether occurrence of major arrhythmic events (MAEs) can be better predicted by NIRFs/PVS than by LVEF alone. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Major arrhythmic event (MAE) occurrence (ICD activation ± sudden cardiac death ± sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation) | Sustained ventricular arrhythmias necessitating ICD therapy ± sudden cardiac death ± sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation | 48 months (total follow up duration) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mortality (all-cause and heart failure-related) - Heart failure-related hospitalization | All cause mortality, mortality due to heart failure, determined by death certificates | 48 months (total follow up duration) |
| Device-related complications |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
ALL of the following criteria must be fulfilled:
Exclusion Criteria:
A patient will be excluded from the study if any of the following criteria are present:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Konstantinos A Gatzoulis, MD | Contact | 00306944580369 | kgatzoul@med.uoa.gr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Konstantinos A Gatzoulis, MD | Hippokrateion General Hospital of Athens | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hippokrateion General Hospital of Athens | Recruiting | Athens | Attica | 11527 | Greece |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002311 | Cardiomyopathy, Dilated |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006332 | Cardiomegaly |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D009202 | Cardiomyopathies |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017147 | Defibrillators, Implantable |
| D016254 | Mutagenesis, Insertional |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D047548 | Defibrillators |
| D004566 | Electrodes |
| D055615 | Electrical Equipment and Supplies |
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |
Not provided
Not provided
Based on the presence of noninvasive risk factors patients will be submitted to invasive programmed ventricular stimulation and receive an ICD if ventricular tachycardia / fibrillation (VT/Vf) are inducible
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| LVEF <35%, NIRFs present, inducible | Sham Comparator | All patients in this group will receive an ICD, the aim is to compare major arrhythmic event occurrence according to NIRF presence and/or inducibility, and whether risk stratification accuracy can be improved as compared to classic approach of ICDs being offered to all dilated cardiomyopathy patients with LVEF<35% |
|
|
Infections - pocket and lead related, as well as inappropriate therapies. Determined by reports of implanting physicians.
| 48 months (total follow up duration) |
| D000083083 |
| Laminopathies |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D004567 |
| Electrodes, Implanted |
| D019736 | Prostheses and Implants |
| D015202 | Protein Engineering |
| D005818 | Genetic Engineering |
| D005821 | Genetic Techniques |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D009154 | Mutation |
| D014644 | Genetic Variation |
| D055614 | Genetic Phenomena |
| D016296 | Mutagenesis |