Clinical Outcomes of Bio-MA and ProRoot MTA in Endodontic Treatment

Clinical Outcomes of Bio-MA and ProRoot MTA in Non-surgical and Surgical Endodontic Treatment: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare the endodontic outcomes of Bio-MA and ProRoot MTA in pulpotomy, orthograde MTA apical barrier, root perforation repair, endodontic microsurgery.

The patients were recruited at the Endodontic clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Thailand. Each treatment was provided following the standard protocol. The calcium silicate based material (Bio-MA or ProRoot MTA) was randomly selected and used in the treatment. The patients were periodically recalled at 6 to 12 months. The outcome of the three treatments based on the clinical and radiographic criteria was assessed by the calibrated examiners and interpreted as ''healed/healing" or ''disease.''

Inclusion Criteria:

• Teeth treated with pulpotomy, orthograde MTA apical barrier, root perforation repair or endodontic microsurgery

Exclusion Criteria:

• Teeth with un-restorable condition
• Teeth with crack or fracture
• Teeth with external or internal root resorption
• Teeth with chronic periodontitis with marginal bone loss more than 5 mm