Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study evaluates an accelerated schedule of theta-burst stimulation using a transcranial magnetic stimulation device for treatment-resistant depression. In a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled fashion, half the participants will receive accelerated theta-burst stimulation while half will receive sham treatment.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an established therapy for treatment-resistant depression. The approved method for treatment is 10Hz stimulation for 40 min over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC). This methodology has been effective in real world situations. The limitations of this approach include the duration of the treatment (approximately 40 minutes per treatment session, 5 days per week, for 4-8 weeks). Recently, we have pursued modifying the treatment parameters to reduce treatment times with an accelerated treatment paradigm with great preliminary success. This study aims to further study our accelerated protocol and examine changes in neuroimaging biomarkers.
Dr. Nolan Williams is the Principle Investigator on the grant associated for this study and so is listed as Study Director on the study record.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active TBS-DLPFC | Experimental | The active group will receive theta-burst TMS stimulation. |
|
| Sham TBS-DLPFC | Sham Comparator | The sham group will receive sham theta-burst TMS stimulation. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active TBS-DLPFC | Device | Participants in the active stimulation group will receive intermittent TBS to left DLPFC. The L-DLPFC will be targeted utilizing the Localite neuronavigation system. Stimulation intensity will be standardized at 90% of RMT and adjusted to the skull to cortical surface distance (see Nahas 2004). Stimulation will be delivered to the L-DLPFC using a MagPro x100 TMS system (MagVenture, Denmark). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Resting State Functional Connectivity of the Subgenual Anterior Cingulate Cortex (sgACC) and the Default Mode Network (DMN). | Assessment of functional connectivity of sgACC to the DMN using magnetic resonance imaging. | Visit 3 (Day 1), Visit 4 (Day 2), Visit 5 (Day 3), Visit 6 (Day 4), Visit 7 (Day 5) and Immediate Post Treatment Follow Up (Visit 8 and Day 6) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship Between Clinical Improvement and Resting State Functional Connectivity Between the sgACC and DMN in Active vs. Sham Participants. | Assessment of functional connectivity of sgACC to the DMN using magnetic resonance imaging. | Visit 3 (Day 1), Visit 4 (Day 2), Visit 5 (Day 3), Visit 6 (Day 4), Visit 7 (Day 5) and Immediate Post Treatment Follow Up (Visit 8/Day 6)) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Lifestyle considerations:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David Spiegel, MD | Stanford University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine | Stanford | California | 94305 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20439832 | Background | George MS, Lisanby SH, Avery D, McDonald WM, Durkalski V, Pavlicova M, Anderson B, Nahas Z, Bulow P, Zarkowski P, Holtzheimer PE 3rd, Schwartz T, Sackeim HA. Daily left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for major depressive disorder: a sham-controlled randomized trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 May;67(5):507-16. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.46. | |
| 8547583 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Active TBS-DLPFC | The active group will receive theta-burst TMS stimulation. Active TBS-DLPFC: Participants in the active stimulation group will receive intermittent TBS to left DLPFC. The L-DLPFC will be targeted utilizing the Localite neuronavigation system. Stimulation intensity will be standardized at 90% of RMT and adjusted to the skull to cortical surface distance (see Nahas 2004). Stimulation will be delivered to the L-DLPFC using a MagPro x100 TMS system (MagVenture, Denmark). |
| FG001 | Sham TBS-DLPFC | The sham group will receive sham theta-burst TMS stimulation. Sham TBS-DLPFC: The parameters in the sham arm will be as above with the internal randomization of the device internally switching to sham in a blinded fashion. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Active TBS-DLPFC | The active group will receive theta-burst TMS stimulation. Active TBS-DLPFC: Participants in the active stimulation group will receive intermittent TBS to left DLPFC. The L-DLPFC will be targeted utilizing the Localite neuronavigation system. Stimulation intensity will be standardized at 90% of RMT and adjusted to the skull to cortical surface distance (see Nahas 2004). Stimulation will be delivered to the L-DLPFC using a MagPro x100 TMS system (MagVenture, Denmark). |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Resting State Functional Connectivity of the Subgenual Anterior Cingulate Cortex (sgACC) and the Default Mode Network (DMN). | Assessment of functional connectivity of sgACC to the DMN using magnetic resonance imaging. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Spearman Correlation Coefficient | Visit 3 (Day 1), Visit 4 (Day 2), Visit 5 (Day 3), Visit 6 (Day 4), Visit 7 (Day 5) and Immediate Post Treatment Follow Up (Visit 8 and Day 6) |
|
3 years
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Active TBS-DLPFC | The active group will receive theta-burst TMS stimulation. Active TBS-DLPFC: Participants in the active stimulation group will receive intermittent TBS to left DLPFC. The L-DLPFC will be targeted utilizing the Localite neuronavigation system. Stimulation intensity will be standardized at 90% of RMT and adjusted to the skull to cortical surface distance (see Nahas 2004). Stimulation will be delivered to the L-DLPFC using a MagPro x100 TMS system (MagVenture, Denmark). |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Principal Investigator | Stanford University | 650-736-2233 | nbassano@stanford.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 30, 2025 | Feb 2, 2026 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D061218 | Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003866 | Depressive Disorder |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Sham TBS-DLPFC | Device | The parameters in the sham arm will be as above with the internal randomization of the device internally switching to sham in a blinded fashion. |
|
| Relationship Between Acute Mood State and Resting State Functional Connectivity Between the sgACC and DMN in Active vs. Sham Participants. | Assessment of functional connectivity of sgACC to the DMN using magnetic resonance imaging. | Visit 3 (Day 1), Visit 4 (Day 2), Visit 5 (Day 3), Visit 6 (Day 4), Visit 7 (Day 5) and Immediate Post Treatment Follow Up (Visit 8/Day 6)) |
| Background |
| George MS, Wassermann EM, Williams WA, Callahan A, Ketter TA, Basser P, Hallett M, Post RM. Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) improves mood in depression. Neuroreport. 1995 Oct 2;6(14):1853-6. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199510020-00008. |
| 8684201 | Background | Pascual-Leone A, Rubio B, Pallardo F, Catala MD. Rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in drug-resistant depression. Lancet. 1996 Jul 27;348(9022):233-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)01219-6. |
| 26850210 | Background | Chung SW, Hill AT, Rogasch NC, Hoy KE, Fitzgerald PB. Use of theta-burst stimulation in changing excitability of motor cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Apr;63:43-64. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Feb 3. |
| 25281475 | Background | Jelic MB, Milanovic SD, Filipovic SR. Differential effects of facilitatory and inhibitory theta burst stimulation of the primary motor cortex on motor learning. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 May;126(5):1016-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 16. |
| 25450537 | Background | Chung SW, Hoy KE, Fitzgerald PB. Theta-burst stimulation: a new form of TMS treatment for depression? Depress Anxiety. 2015 Mar;32(3):182-92. doi: 10.1002/da.22335. Epub 2014 Nov 28. |
| 24411682 | Background | Plewnia C, Pasqualetti P, Grosse S, Schlipf S, Wasserka B, Zwissler B, Fallgatter A. Treatment of major depression with bilateral theta burst stimulation: a randomized controlled pilot trial. J Affect Disord. 2014 Mar;156:219-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.12.025. Epub 2013 Dec 28. |
| 25430687 | Background | Prasser J, Schecklmann M, Poeppl TB, Frank E, Kreuzer PM, Hajak G, Rupprecht R, Landgrebe M, Langguth B. Bilateral prefrontal rTMS and theta burst TMS as an add-on treatment for depression: a randomized placebo controlled trial. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;16(1):57-65. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2014.964768. Epub 2014 Nov 28. |
| 24833712 | Background | Daskalakis ZJ. Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression: when less may be more. Brain. 2014 Jul;137(Pt 7):1860-2. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu123. Epub 2014 May 15. No abstract available. |
| 19862614 | Background | Thut G, Pascual-Leone A. A review of combined TMS-EEG studies to characterize lasting effects of repetitive TMS and assess their usefulness in cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Brain Topogr. 2010 Jan;22(4):219-32. doi: 10.1007/s10548-009-0115-4. Epub 2009 Oct 28. |
| 20734360 | Background | Holtzheimer PE 3rd, McDonald WM, Mufti M, Kelley ME, Quinn S, Corso G, Epstein CM. Accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Depress Anxiety. 2010 Oct;27(10):960-3. doi: 10.1002/da.20731. |
| 24060620 | Background | Fung PK, Robinson PA. Neural field theory of synaptic metaplasticity with applications to theta burst stimulation. J Theor Biol. 2014 Jan 7;340:164-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.09.021. Epub 2013 Sep 21. |
| 8524021 | Background | Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, Hyde JS. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1995 Oct;34(4):537-41. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910340409. |
| 12506194 | Background | Greicius MD, Krasnow B, Reiss AL, Menon V. Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan 7;100(1):253-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0135058100. Epub 2002 Dec 27. |
| 15976020 | Background | Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Van Essen DC, Raichle ME. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 5;102(27):9673-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504136102. Epub 2005 Jun 23. |
| 18403396 | Background | Greicius MD, Supekar K, Menon V, Dougherty RF. Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jan;19(1):72-8. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn059. Epub 2008 Apr 9. |
| BG001 | Sham TBS-DLPFC | The sham group will receive sham theta-burst TMS stimulation. Sham TBS-DLPFC: The parameters in the sham arm will be as above with the internal randomization of the device internally switching to sham in a blinded fashion. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Sham TBS-DLPFC | The sham group will receive sham theta-burst TMS stimulation. Sham TBS-DLPFC: The parameters in the sham arm will be as above with the internal randomization of the device internally switching to sham in a blinded fashion. |
|
|
| Secondary | Relationship Between Clinical Improvement and Resting State Functional Connectivity Between the sgACC and DMN in Active vs. Sham Participants. | Assessment of functional connectivity of sgACC to the DMN using magnetic resonance imaging. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Spearman Correlation Coefficient | Visit 3 (Day 1), Visit 4 (Day 2), Visit 5 (Day 3), Visit 6 (Day 4), Visit 7 (Day 5) and Immediate Post Treatment Follow Up (Visit 8/Day 6)) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Relationship Between Acute Mood State and Resting State Functional Connectivity Between the sgACC and DMN in Active vs. Sham Participants. | Assessment of functional connectivity of sgACC to the DMN using magnetic resonance imaging. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Spearman Correlation Coefficient | Visit 3 (Day 1), Visit 4 (Day 2), Visit 5 (Day 3), Visit 6 (Day 4), Visit 7 (Day 5) and Immediate Post Treatment Follow Up (Visit 8/Day 6)) |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 24 |
| 0 |
| 24 |
| 0 |
| 24 |
| EG001 | Sham TBS-DLPFC | The sham group will receive sham theta-burst TMS stimulation. Sham TBS-DLPFC: The parameters in the sham arm will be as above with the internal randomization of the device internally switching to sham in a blinded fashion. | 0 | 24 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Visit 5 |
|
| Visit 6 |
|
| Visit 7 |
|
| Visit 8 |
|
| Visit 5 |
|
| Visit 6 |
|
| Visit 7 |
|
| Visit 8 |
|