Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R01AI122319 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source | |
| 122319 | Other Identifier | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a pilot study to assess the feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of delivery of the investigational "MedViewer" intervention in adult patients living with HIV who have been prescribed antiretroviral (ARV) medications. The Medviewer uses Infra-red (IR) matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization (MALDESI) technology for mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) to analyze patient hair samples to provide information on ARV adherence in real-time.
The study has two different groups of participants: the patients, and their clinician providers.
This study is part of a larger research program that is investigating a novel non-invasive approach to rapidly quantify ARV concentrations and provide evidence of drug ingestion. The ultimate goal is to provide clinicians and patients feedback on ARV adherence. Infra-red (IR) matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization (MALDESI) technology for mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) is used to visualize and quantify ARV concentrations in hair. The IR-MALDESI MSI has been labeled the "MedViewer".
Patient participants will be scheduled for the sampling visit to correspond with their next appointment at the University of North Carolina (UNC) Infectious Disease (ID) clinic. Patient participants will be asked to arrive to their clinic appointment at least two hours prior to the scheduled time to be consented and enrolled. If eligible and enrolled in the study, patient participants will have a small hair sample (5 strands) plucked from a discrete location on the back of their head. Patient participants will also have a small blood sample collected. The results from the MedViewer test will be provided to both the patient and their provider, in order to facilitate a discussion around medication adherence. After receiving the results, all participants will complete a brief questionnaire about their experience with the MedViewer.
As this is a feasibility study, results from the Medviewer test will not be used to make clinical decisions related to care.
Major changes after the start of enrollment:
These changes were implemented on November 5, 2020 in a Letter of Amendment (LOA) to ENLIGHTEN Protocol Version 2. The LOA detailed changes made to the protocol due to the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient participants | Experimental | Patient and provider will view and discuss results of the MedViewer test. |
|
| Provider participants | Experimental | Patient and provider will view and discuss results of the MedViewer test. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MedViewer report | Device | Results from the analysis of hair samples performed using the MedViewer |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percent of Patient Participants That Received a MedViewer Report as Planned | Patient participants received their MedViewer report as planned if: (1) they had results delivered to the research team member within 2 hours of initiation of hair sample processing; and (2) discussed results with a provider participant during their clinic visit. The percent of patient participants that received the MedViewer report as planned is reported. | Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit |
| Percent of Contacted Patients That Were Eligible for a Screening Visit and Agreed to Participate in the Study | Contacted patients were deemed eligible for a screening visit using a pre-screening questionnaire and provided documented informed consent to participate in the study. The percent of all contacted eligible patients that agreed to participate in study is reported. Per study protocol, this outcome is not measured in providers. | Visit 1 (Day 1) before patient participant clinic visit |
| Percent of Patient Participants That Were Satisfied With Their Discussion With a Provider Participant About Antiretroviral (ART) Adherence Using the MedViewer Report | Patient participants were asked to rate their satisfaction with the MedViewer report for promoting a productive discussion of ART adherence with a provider participant. Satisfaction was rated on a rated on a 5-point scale (1="very unsatisfied" to 5="very satisfied"), with higher scores being more favorable. The percent of patient participants reporting 4 or greater (4="somewhat satisfied" or 5="very satisfied") on this scale as was calculated. | Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit |
| Percent of Patient Participants for Whom Provider Participants Reported the MedViewer Report as Being Useful for Promoting a Productive Antiretroviral (ART) Adherence Discussion | For each of patient participant, provider participants were asked to rate the usefulness of the MedViewer report in promoting a productive discussion with the patient participant about ART adherence using a 5-point scale (1="not at all useful" to 5="extremely useful"), with a higher score being more favorable. The percent of patient participants with provider participants reporting 4 or greater (4="very useful" or 5="extremely useful") on this scale as was calculated. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Among Patient Participants That Did Dot Receive a MedViewer Report, Percent of Patient Participants That Did Not Receive the MedViewer for a Given Reason or Reasons | Reasons for patient participants' non-receipt of MedViewer report were only assessed for the subset of patient participants for whom non-receipt was reported. Reasons for non-receipt were assessed by provider participants for each patient participant after their scheduled visit using a single multiple-choice, multiple-answer question. The percent of patient participants for whom a reason or combination of reasons for non-receipt is reported. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient participants:
Documentation of HIV-1 infection by means of any one of the following:
At least 18 years of age on the day of consent.
Documentation of HIV viral loads over 2-year period prior to screening.
Has been a patient at the UNC ID clinic for at least 90 consecutive days prior to the date of enrollment in the study (i.e. attended first appointment at the UNC ID Clinic at least 90 days prior to the date of enrollment in the study).
Has attended at least one HIV appointment at the UNC ID clinic within the 365 days prior to the date of enrollment in the study.
Has been prescribed one of the ARV medications eligible in this study (Dolutegravir, Emtricitabine) by a UNC provider for at least 90 days prior to the date of enrollment in the study.
Has an HIV appointment scheduled at the UNC ID clinic during the enrollment period of the study with a medical provider enrolled in the study.
Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent form indicating that the participant has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study.
Has stated willingness and availability to comply with all study procedures for the duration of the study.
Literate in English.
Has at least 1.0 cm of natural caput hair.
As enrollment will occur in a stratified manner based on 2 viral load strata, (n = 25 for patients with undetectable viral loads, n = 25 for those with detectable viral loads), once a stratum quota is reached, patients whose viral loads fall within that stratum will not be eligible to participate in the study.
Provider participants:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient participants:
Provider participants:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Angela Kashuba, PharmD | University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27599 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37493932 | Derived | Golin CE, Rosen EP, Ferguson EG, Perry NR, Poliseno AJ, Munson AJ, Davis A, Hill LM, Keys J, White NR, Farel CE, Kashuba A. Feasibility, Acceptability and Appropriateness of MedViewer: A Novel Hair-Based Antiretroviral Real-Time Clinical Monitoring Tool Providing Adherence Feedback to Patients and Their Providers. AIDS Behav. 2023 Dec;27(12):3886-3904. doi: 10.1007/s10461-023-04104-1. Epub 2023 Jul 26. | |
| 37083754 | Derived | Poliseno A, Ferguson E, Perry R, Munson A, Davis A, Hill L, Keys J, White N, Farel C, Gay C, Golin C, Rosen E, Kashuba A. Establishing Novel Antiretroviral Imaging for Hair to Elucidate Nonadherence: Protocol for a Single-Arm Cross-sectional Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Apr 21;12:e41188. doi: 10.2196/41188. |
Not provided
Not provided
Response to individual request for raw data. Any resulting publication from this proposal will include the principle investigator or a co-investigator listed on the application as corresponding author. Raw de-identified datasets will be shared with requesting scientists at the discretion of principle investigator to foster scientific openness in an ethical and responsible manner.
Upon acceptance of final manuscript for publication for an indefinite time period
Before data will be shared, a data use agreement will be put in place in accordance with local regulations. The requestor will need to obtain appropriate ethics approval.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Patient Participants | Patient and provider will view and discuss results of the MedViewer test. MedViewer report: Results from the analysis of hair samples performed using the MedViewer |
| FG001 | Provider Participants | Patient and provider will view and discuss results of the MedViewer test. MedViewer report: Results from the analysis of hair samples performed using the MedViewer |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Patient Participants | Patient and provider will view and discuss results of the MedViewer test. MedViewer report: Results from the analysis of hair samples performed using the MedViewer |
| BG001 | Provider Participants |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percent of Patient Participants That Received a MedViewer Report as Planned | Patient participants received their MedViewer report as planned if: (1) they had results delivered to the research team member within 2 hours of initiation of hair sample processing; and (2) discussed results with a provider participant during their clinic visit. The percent of patient participants that received the MedViewer report as planned is reported. | All patient participants were included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of patient participants | Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit |
|
Adverse events were assessed during the interval from hair sample collection to end line visit, up to a total of 28 days.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Patient Participants | Patient and provider will view and discuss results of the MedViewer test. MedViewer report: Results from the analysis of hair samples performed using the MedViewer |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Poliseno | UNC Chapel Hill | 919-962-5344 | amanda_poliseno@unc.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP_ICF | Yes | Yes | Yes | Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form | May 13, 2021 | Sep 14, 2022 | Prot_SAP_ICF_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055118 | Medication Adherence |
| D015658 | HIV Infections |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010349 | Patient Compliance |
| D010342 | Patient Acceptance of Health Care |
| D000074822 | Treatment Adherence and Compliance |
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Dual Group Assignment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit |
| Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit |
| Mean Hours From Patient Participant Hair Sample Processing Initiation to MedViewer Report Delivery to Designated Research Staff Member | For each patient participant, the number of hours elapsed from the time of initiation of hair processing in the lab (Time 1) to the time of results delivery to designated research staff member (Time 2) was calculated, and a population mean was determined. | Time 1 to Time 2 prior to or on Visit 1 (Day 1) |
| Percent of Participants Reporting a High Likelihood of Future MedViewer Report Use | The 4-point scale measuring the likelihood of future MedViewer report use ranged from 1="definitely would not" to 4="definitely would", with a higher score being more favorable. The percent of participants that scored 3 or greater on the likelihood of future MedViewer use scale (3="probably would" or "4="definitely would") was calculated. | Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit for patient participants, end line visit for provider participants |
| Percent of Patient Participants Reporting High Comprehension of the MedViewer Report | Patient participants were asked to rate their comprehension of the information presented in the MedViewer report using a 4-point scale (1="very difficult to understand" to 4="very easy to understand"), with a higher score being more favorable. The percent of patient participants reporting 3 or greater on this scale (3="somewhat easy to understand" or 4="very easy to understand") was calculated. | Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit |
| Percent of Patient Participants Reported by Provider Participants as Having High Comprehension of the MedViewer Report | Provider participants were asked to rate each of patient participant's comprehension of the information presented in the MedViewer report using a 5-point scale (1="understood not at all well" to 5="understood excellently"), with a higher score being more favorable. The percent of patient participants with provider participants reporting 4 or greater (4="understood very well" or 5="understood excellently") on this scale as was calculated. | Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit |
| Mean Usefulness Score for the MedViewer Report to Promote ART (Antiretroviral) Adherence | Participants were asked to rate their perceived usefulness of the MedViewer report for promoting ART adherence. Usefulness was rated on a rated on a 5-point scale (1="not at all useful" to 5="extremely useful"), with higher scores being more favorable. A mean usefulness score was calculated for each participant. | Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit for patient participants, end line visit for provider participants |
| Percent of Participants That Reported a Positive Change in the Patient-provider Relationship After Using the MedViewer Report | Participants were asked to rate the comparative satisfaction with patient participant-provider participant discussions during the MedViewer visits as compared to typical visits. Patient participants were asked this question after Visit 1, while provider participants were asked this question at their end line visit. Change in relationship was rated on 5-point scale (1="much less satisfied than usual" to 5="much more satisfied than usual"), with a higher score being more favorable. The percent of participants reporting 4 or greater on this scale (4="somewhat more satisfied than usual" or 5="much more satisfied than usual") was calculated. | Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit for patient participants, end line visit for provider participants |
Patient and provider will view and discuss results of the MedViewer test.
MedViewer report: Results from the analysis of hair samples performed using the MedViewer
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Primary | Percent of Contacted Patients That Were Eligible for a Screening Visit and Agreed to Participate in the Study | Contacted patients were deemed eligible for a screening visit using a pre-screening questionnaire and provided documented informed consent to participate in the study. The percent of all contacted eligible patients that agreed to participate in study is reported. Per study protocol, this outcome is not measured in providers. | All patients that were contacted and deemed eligible for study were included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of contacted patients | Visit 1 (Day 1) before patient participant clinic visit |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percent of Patient Participants That Were Satisfied With Their Discussion With a Provider Participant About Antiretroviral (ART) Adherence Using the MedViewer Report | Patient participants were asked to rate their satisfaction with the MedViewer report for promoting a productive discussion of ART adherence with a provider participant. Satisfaction was rated on a rated on a 5-point scale (1="very unsatisfied" to 5="very satisfied"), with higher scores being more favorable. The percent of patient participants reporting 4 or greater (4="somewhat satisfied" or 5="very satisfied") on this scale as was calculated. | Patient participants that received a MedViewer report and discussed the report with a provider participant as planned were included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of patient participants | Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percent of Patient Participants for Whom Provider Participants Reported the MedViewer Report as Being Useful for Promoting a Productive Antiretroviral (ART) Adherence Discussion | For each of patient participant, provider participants were asked to rate the usefulness of the MedViewer report in promoting a productive discussion with the patient participant about ART adherence using a 5-point scale (1="not at all useful" to 5="extremely useful"), with a higher score being more favorable. The percent of patient participants with provider participants reporting 4 or greater (4="very useful" or 5="extremely useful") on this scale as was calculated. | Patient participants that received a MedViewer report and discussed the report with a provider participant as planned were included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of patient participants | Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Among Patient Participants That Did Dot Receive a MedViewer Report, Percent of Patient Participants That Did Not Receive the MedViewer for a Given Reason or Reasons | Reasons for patient participants' non-receipt of MedViewer report were only assessed for the subset of patient participants for whom non-receipt was reported. Reasons for non-receipt were assessed by provider participants for each patient participant after their scheduled visit using a single multiple-choice, multiple-answer question. The percent of patient participants for whom a reason or combination of reasons for non-receipt is reported. | Patient participants that did not receive and/or discuss a MedViewer report with a provider participant as planned were included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of patient participants | Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Hours From Patient Participant Hair Sample Processing Initiation to MedViewer Report Delivery to Designated Research Staff Member | For each patient participant, the number of hours elapsed from the time of initiation of hair processing in the lab (Time 1) to the time of results delivery to designated research staff member (Time 2) was calculated, and a population mean was determined. | All patient participants were included in the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | hours | Time 1 to Time 2 prior to or on Visit 1 (Day 1) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percent of Participants Reporting a High Likelihood of Future MedViewer Report Use | The 4-point scale measuring the likelihood of future MedViewer report use ranged from 1="definitely would not" to 4="definitely would", with a higher score being more favorable. The percent of participants that scored 3 or greater on the likelihood of future MedViewer use scale (3="probably would" or "4="definitely would") was calculated. | All patient participants were included in the analysis. Only provider participants that saw patient participants were included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit for patient participants, end line visit for provider participants |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percent of Patient Participants Reporting High Comprehension of the MedViewer Report | Patient participants were asked to rate their comprehension of the information presented in the MedViewer report using a 4-point scale (1="very difficult to understand" to 4="very easy to understand"), with a higher score being more favorable. The percent of patient participants reporting 3 or greater on this scale (3="somewhat easy to understand" or 4="very easy to understand") was calculated. | Patient participants that received a MedViewer report and discussed the report with a provider participant as planned were included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of patient participants | Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percent of Patient Participants Reported by Provider Participants as Having High Comprehension of the MedViewer Report | Provider participants were asked to rate each of patient participant's comprehension of the information presented in the MedViewer report using a 5-point scale (1="understood not at all well" to 5="understood excellently"), with a higher score being more favorable. The percent of patient participants with provider participants reporting 4 or greater (4="understood very well" or 5="understood excellently") on this scale as was calculated. | Patient participants that received a MedViewer report and discussed the report with a provider participant as planned were included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of patient participants | Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Usefulness Score for the MedViewer Report to Promote ART (Antiretroviral) Adherence | Participants were asked to rate their perceived usefulness of the MedViewer report for promoting ART adherence. Usefulness was rated on a rated on a 5-point scale (1="not at all useful" to 5="extremely useful"), with higher scores being more favorable. A mean usefulness score was calculated for each participant. | Patient participants that discussed the MedViewer as planned were included in the analysis. Provider participants that saw patient participants were included in the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit for patient participants, end line visit for provider participants |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percent of Participants That Reported a Positive Change in the Patient-provider Relationship After Using the MedViewer Report | Participants were asked to rate the comparative satisfaction with patient participant-provider participant discussions during the MedViewer visits as compared to typical visits. Patient participants were asked this question after Visit 1, while provider participants were asked this question at their end line visit. Change in relationship was rated on 5-point scale (1="much less satisfied than usual" to 5="much more satisfied than usual"), with a higher score being more favorable. The percent of participants reporting 4 or greater on this scale (4="somewhat more satisfied than usual" or 5="much more satisfied than usual") was calculated. | Patient participants that discussed the MedViewer as planned were included in the analysis. Provider participants that saw patient participants were included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit for patient participants, end line visit for provider participants |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 37 |
| 0 |
| 37 |
| 0 |
| 37 |
| EG001 | Provider Participants | Patient and provider will view and discuss results of the MedViewer test. MedViewer report: Results from the analysis of hair samples performed using the MedViewer | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D000086982 | Blood-Borne Infections |
| D003141 | Communicable Diseases |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D015229 | Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral |
| D012749 | Sexually Transmitted Diseases |
| D016180 | Lentivirus Infections |
| D012192 | Retroviridae Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D007153 | Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
|
| Other |
|