Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Iowa | OTHER |
| University of Wisconsin, Madison | OTHER |
| University of Louisville | OTHER |
| Memorial Health System |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Compare the effectiveness and safety of two techniques for modification of slow AV nodal pathway conduction underlying AVNRT: 1) New Ablation Technique, low voltage and wave front collision mapping vs. 2) the Standard Ablation Technique, an anatomical/electrogram approach.
Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is an arrhythmia condition that affects 1 in 250 to 1/1000 children. While there are many different mechanisms for SVT, having an additional electrical pathway in the heart is the most common underlying reason. The extra electrical pathway may be in the form of an accessory AV pathway that bridges the atrium and ventricle or a slowing conducting pathway in the AV nodal region. SVT may cause significant disability from the sudden unexpected rapid increase in heart rate. Symptoms associated with SVT may include dizziness, syncope, shortness of breath, chest pain and exercise intolerance. Prolonged episodes that do not self terminate may require the patient to be evaluated in an emergency room. If left untreated, SVT may result in congestive heart failure and the potential for sudden cardiac arrest.
Catheter based ablation involves the localized application of energy to the site responsible for the SVT, effecting a permanent cure. Ablation has become the primary mode for treating patients with SVT. Ablation is achieved by the focal and limited application of energy (either heating the tissue to temperatures beyond viability, radiofrequency energy (RF)) or cooling the tissue (cryoablation)) to functionally destroy the underlying myocardial tissue. Both energy sources are very effective in achieving this end point, and the elimination of arrhythmias.
SVT involving the AV node, known as AV node reentry tachycardia (AVNRT), is one of the most common forms of this arrhythmia. While a conceptual construct for understanding AV node reentry tachycardia has evolved over the years, the subtleties of the exact pathophysiologic mechanism leading to its occurrence is undefined. Most of the medical literature endorses the concept of two (dual) inputs into the compact AV node. Circus movement or reentry incorporating the fast and slow pathways (two AV nodal pathways) is thought to facilitate this form of SVT. Current ablation practice is centered on modification of the slow AV nodal pathway conduction, leaving the fast AV nodal pathway intact so as to allow for a normal conduction interval between the atrium and ventricule, the PR interval.
Approaches for ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway differ among pediatric centers. The two most used techniques for ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway to prevent AV nodal reentry tachycardia involve: 1) an anatomical/electrogram approach based on physical position of the ablation catheter and the electrogram morpholog (Standard Technique), and 2) mapping of electrogram voltage in the triangle of Koch to define an area of low voltage with assessment of the site for wave front collision of electrical activity traveling over the fast and slow AV nodal pathways (New Technique).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Ablation Technique | Active Comparator | Will undergo ablation using voltage mapping and triangle of Koch propagation wave collision mapping. Ablation will be performed at or slightly above the site of wave front collision. |
|
| Standard Ablation Technique | Active Comparator | Ablation performed using the traditional anatomical / electrogram guided ablation approach. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Ablation Technique | Procedure | Patient will undergo ablation using voltage mapping and triangle of Koch propagation wave collision mapping. Ablation will be performed at or slightly above the site of wave front collision. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Primary end point - Number of lesions needed to achieve modification of slow AV nodal pathway | Number of ablation lesion needed to achieve modification of slow AV nodal pathway conduction underlying AVNRT as defined by one of the following:
| During procedure- start to finish |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary End points - Time from start to end of ablation lesion application(s), and total length of procedure. |
| During procedure- start to finish |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Table 1. Diagnoses in Adult Patients with Simple Congenital Heart Disease
Exclusion Criteria:
Table 2. Diagnoses in Adult Patients with Congenital Heart Disease of Moderate Complexity
Table 3. Types of Adult Congenital Heart Disease - Severe Complexity
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Moak | Contact | 2024765707 | JMOAK@childrensnational.org | |
| Sarah Litt | Contact | 2024765707 | slitt@childrensnational.org |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Moak | Children's National Research Institute | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Children's National Hospital | Recruiting | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20010 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26899545 | Background | Philip Saul J, Kanter RJ; WRITING COMMITTEE; Abrams D, Asirvatham S, Bar-Cohen Y, Blaufox AD, Cannon B, Clark J, Dick M, Freter A, Kertesz NJ, Kirsh JA, Kugler J, LaPage M, McGowan FX, Miyake CY, Nathan A, Papagiannis J, Paul T, Pflaumer A, Skanes AC, Stevenson WG, Von Bergen N, Zimmerman F. PACES/HRS expert consensus statement on the use of catheter ablation in children and patients with congenital heart disease: Developed in partnership with the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS). Endorsed by the governing bodies of PACES, HRS, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Association for European Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jun;13(6):e251-89. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Feb 17. No abstract available. | |
| 28687669 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013617 | Tachycardia, Supraventricular |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013610 | Tachycardia |
| D001145 | Arrhythmias, Cardiac |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
Patients will be randomized within each participating center, not by center, into study groups:
Randomization will occur through a module in Redcap.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Standard Ablation Technique | Procedure | Ablation performed using the traditional anatomical / electrogram guided ablation approach. |
|
| Memorial Health System | Recruiting | Hollywood | Florida | 33021 | United States |
|
| Univeristy of Iowa | Recruiting | Iowa City | Iowa | 52242 | United States |
|
| University of Louisville | Recruiting | Louisville | Kentucky | 40202 | United States |
|
| University of Wisconsin | Recruiting | Madison | Wisconsin | 53792 | United States |
|
| Background |
| Papagiannis J, Beissel DJ, Krause U, Cabrera M, Telishevska M, Seslar S, Johnsrude C, Anderson C, Tisma-Dupanovic S, Connelly D, Avramidis D, Carter C, Kornyei L, Law I, Von Bergen N, Janusek J, Silva J, Rosenthal E, Willcox M, Kubus P, Hessling G, Paul T; Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society. Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease: Outcome After Catheter Ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Jul;10(7):e004869. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004869. Epub 2017 Jul 7. |
| 29909540 | Background | Markowitz SM, Lerman BB. A contemporary view of atrioventricular nodal physiology. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Aug;52(3):271-279. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0392-5. Epub 2018 Jun 16. |
| 19225293 | Background | Lee PC, Chen SA, Hwang B. Atrioventricular node anatomy and physiology: implications for ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2009 Mar;24(2):105-12. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e328323d83f. |
| 23872907 | Background | Malloy L, Law IH, Von Bergen NH. Voltage mapping for slow-pathway visualization and ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia in pediatric and young adult patients. Pediatr Cardiol. 2014 Jan;35(1):103-7. doi: 10.1007/s00246-013-0748-7. Epub 2013 Jul 20. |
| 32494469 | Background | Van Aartsen A, Law IH, Maldonado JR, Von Bergen NH. Propagation Mapping Wave Collision Correlates to the Site of Successful Ablation During Voltage Mapping in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2017 Sep 15;8(9):2836-2842. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2017.080905. eCollection 2017 Sep. |
| 16648062 | Background | Collins KK, Dubin AM, Chiesa NA, Avasarala K, Van Hare GF. Cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation for treatment of pediatric atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: initial experience with 4-mm cryocatheter. Heart Rhythm. 2006 May;3(5):564-70. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.01.026. Epub 2006 Feb 28. |
| 15121072 | Background | Kammeraad J, Udink ten Cate F, Simmers T, Emmel M, Wittkampf FH, Sreeram N. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children aided by the LocaLisa mapping system. Europace. 2004 May;6(3):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2004.02.004. |
| 10929439 | Background | Kriebel T, Bertram H, Windhagen-Mahnert B, Bokenkamp R, Kaulitz R, Rohloff A, Peuster M, Hausdorf G, Paul T. [Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia in children: curative treatment by high frequency catheter ablation]. Z Kardiol. 2000 Jun;89(6):538-45. doi: 10.1007/s003920070226. German. |
| 10456636 | Background | Rhodes LA, Wieand TS, Vetter VL. Low temperature and low energy radiofrequency modification of atrioventricular nodal slow pathways in pediatric patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 Jul;22(7):1071-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00572.x. |
| 7800563 | Background | Teixeira OH, Balaji S, Case CL, Gillette PC. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994 Oct;17(10):1621-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb02355.x. |
| 20378513 | Background | Papagiannis J, Papadopoulou K, Rammos S, Katritsis D. Cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children: long-term results. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2010 Mar-Apr;51(2):122-6. |
| Background | PASS 15 Power Analysis and Sample Size Software (2017). NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA, ncss.com/software/pass. |
| Background | Chow, S.C.; Shao, J.; Wang, H. 2003. Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research. Marcel Dekker. New York. |
| D000075224 |
| Cardiac Conduction System Disease |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |