Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo controlled trial to compare the safety and effectiveness of a single injection of Cingal® to a single injection of Triamcinolone Hexacetonide (TH) to achieve pain relief and other symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee.
To determine the contribution of Triamcinolone Hexacetonide (TH) when combined with sodium hyaluronate for pain relief, both in terms of magnitude and duration, when used as single injection, as compared to a single injection of TH alone in subjects diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the knee.
A saline placebo is included within the trial to set the expectation of a return to Baseline pain for the subjects.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cingal | Experimental | Single injection of Cingal: 4 milliliter (mL) dose of 88 mg (22 mg/mL) of cross-linked sodium hyaluronate with 18 mg (4.5 mg/mL) of triamcinolone hexacetonide (TH). Manufactured by Anika Therapeutics. |
|
| Triamcinolone Hexacetonide (TH) | Active Comparator | Single injection of Triamcinolone Hexacetonide (TH): 1 milliliter (mL) dose of 20 mg/ml TH. Manufactured by IntraPharm. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Single injection of Placebo: 4 milliliter (mL) dose of 0.9% saline. Manufactured by Anika Therapeutics. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cingal | Drug | Single intra-articular injection of Cingal into the knee. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score | The change from Baseline in knee pain post-treatment as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score comparing the Cingal arm to the TH arm, the Cingal arm to the Placebo arm, and the TH arm to the Placebo arm. WOMAC Pain is a validated 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm = No Pain to 100 mm = Highest Pain Level. A negative value for the change from Baseline indicates improvement in the WOMAC Pain Score, i.e. less pain post-treatment. A larger negative value indicates lower pain levels and a better outcome. | 26 Weeks |
| Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score | The change from Baseline in knee pain post-treatment as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score comparing the Cingal arm to the TH arm, the Cingal arm to the Placebo arm, and the TH arm to the Placebo arm. WOMAC Pain is a validated 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm = No Pain to 100 mm = Highest Pain Level. A negative number for the change from Baseline indicates improvement in the WOMAC Pain Score, i.e. less pain post-treatment. | 18 Weeks |
| Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score | The change from Baseline in knee pain post-treatment as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score comparing the Cingal arm to the TH arm, the Cingal arm to the Placebo arm, and the TH arm to the Placebo arm. WOMAC Pain is a validated 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm = No Pain to 100 mm = Highest Pain Level. A negative number for the change from Baseline indicates improvement in the WOMAC Pain Score, i.e. less pain post-treatment. | 12 Weeks |
| Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Outcomes Measures for Rheumatic Arthritis Clinical Trials-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Responder Index | The post-treatment responder rate is determined through a calculation defined by the Outcomes Measures for Rheumatic Arthritis Clinical Trials-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Responder Index. The OMERACT-OARSI Responder Index reports the percentage of subjects that met the criteria to be a good responder to treatment. The criteria for response are (1) improvement in pain or physical function >50% and an absolute change >20 mm; or (2) improvement of >20% with an absolute change >10 mm in at least of the following three categories: pain, physical function, and patient's global assessment. A higher percentage of subjects responding indicates a better outcome. OMERACT-OARSI responder rates were compared between the Cingal, TH and Placebo arms. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject is 40-75 years old.
Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤ 40 kg/m2.
Subject has Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) severity grade II or III in the Index knee as determined by X-Ray. Contralateral knee: K-L severity grade 0, I or II.
Subject has had at least two signs and at least two symptoms of OA disease (based on the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for diagnosing knee OA) in the Index knee for at least 6 months despite conservative treatment (weight reduction, physical therapy, pain medications, etc.). The EULAR signs and symptoms are as follows:
Subject must be willing to abstain from other IA treatments of the knee for the duration of the study.
Subject is willing to discontinue all analgesics including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), except acetaminophen before the treatment injection and through the completion of the study. NSAIDs should be discontinued through the Screening period.
Subject is willing to use only acetaminophen (up to a maximum of 3.0 grams per day) for the treatment of joint pain for the duration of the study. At least forty-eight hours prior to the Baseline Visit and each follow-up visit, the Subject is willing to discontinue use of acetaminophen
Subject is willing to maintain a stable dose of oral glucosamine and/or chondroitin sulfate products throughout the study, if taken prior to signing ICF.
Subject is able to understand and comply with the requirements of the study and voluntarily provides consent.
Baseline Inclusion Criteria 24 Subject has a Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain-sub-score ≥ 50 mm and ≤ 90 mm in the affected knee and ≤ 30 mm in the contralateral knee on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scale.
Exclusion Criteria:
Baseline Exclusion Criteria 25. Subject has a decrease of ≥ 20 mm in the WOMAC pain-sub-score (average of 5 pain scales) from Screening to Baseline in the Index knee on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scale.
26. Subject has a synovial fluid aspirate volume > 10 mL in the Index knee. 27. Subject has a contraindication to continue with the study treatment injection based on the visual appearance of the synovial fluid aspirate unless the fluid is examined microscopically prior to injection with no clinically significant findings (e.g. bacteria, crystals or blood).
28. Subject has range of motion of less than 100° flexion in either knee.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Joanne MacFie | Anika Therapeutics | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orthopaedic Specialist of North America, PLLC DBA OrthoArizona | Chandler | Arizona | 85224 | United States | ||
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Cingal | Single injection of a 4 ml unit dose of Cingal containing 88 mg (22 mg/ml) of cross-linked sodium hyaluronate and 18 mg (4.5 mg/ml) of triamcinolone hexacetonide (TH) |
| FG001 | Triamcinolone Hexacetonide (TH) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Dec 11, 2019 | Jun 11, 2023 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Triamcinolone Hexacetonide (TH) | Drug | Single intra-articular injection of TH into the knee. |
|
|
| Placebo | Drug | Single intra-articular injection Placebo (0.9% Saline) into the knee. |
|
|
The change from Baseline in knee pain post-treatment as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score comparing the Cingal arm to the TH arm, the Cingal arm to the Placebo arm, and the TH arm to the Placebo arm. WOMAC Pain is a validated 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm = No Pain to 100 mm = Highest Pain Level. A negative number for the change from Baseline indicates improvement in the WOMAC Pain Score, i.e. less pain post-treatment.
| 6 Weeks |
| Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score | The change from Baseline in knee pain post-treatment as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score comparing the Cingal arm to the TH arm, the Cingal arm to the Placebo arm, and the TH arm to the Placebo arm. WOMAC Pain is a validated 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm = No Pain to 100 mm = Highest Pain Level. A negative number for the change from Baseline indicates improvement in the WOMAC Pain Score, i.e. less pain post-treatment. | 3 Weeks |
| Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score | The change from Baseline in knee pain post-treatment as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score comparing the Cingal arm to the TH arm, the Cingal arm to the Placebo arm, and the TH arm to the Placebo arm. WOMAC Pain is a validated 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm = No Pain to 100 mm = Highest Pain Level. A negative number for the change from Baseline indicates improvement in the WOMAC Pain Score, i.e. less pain post-treatment. | 1 Week |
| 26 Weeks |
| Change From Baseline in Knee Pain as Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score | Change in knee pain was obtained from participant responses using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score at each time point. This VAS scale ranged from 0 mm = No Pain to 100 mm = Highest Pain Level. A negative value for the change in pain indicates less pain post-treatment. A larger negative value indicates a higher level of improvement, and a better outcome. | 26 Weeks |
| Change From Baseline in Knee Pain as Measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score | Change in knee pain was obtained from participant responses using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score. This NRS Pain Score ranged from 0 = No Pain to 10 = Highest Pain Level. A negative value for the change in Pain Score indicates less pain post-treatment. A larger negative value indicates a higher level of improvement, and a better outcome. | 26 Weeks |
| Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Function Score | The change from Baseline in knee function post-treatment as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Function Score comparing the Cingal, TH, and Placebo arms. WOMAC Function Score records participant responses regarding the difficulty they have performing daily activities. The WOMAC Function Score is a validated 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm = No Difficulty to 100 mm = Extreme Difficulty. A negative value for the change from Baseline indicates improvement in WOMAC Function Score. A larger negative value indicates improvement in performing daily activities, and a better outcome. | 26 Weeks |
| Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Score | The change from Baseline in knee stiffness post-treatment as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Score comparing the Cingal, TH, and Placebo arms. WOMAC Stiffness Score records participant responses regarding the sensation of ease in moving their joint. The WOMAC Stiffness Score is a validated 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm = No Stiffness to 100 mm = Extreme Stiffness. A negative value for the change from Baseline indicates improvement in WOMAC Stiffness Score. A larger negative value indicates less stiffness, and a better outcome. | 26 Weeks |
| Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Total Score | The change from Baseline in overall clinical improvement in the knee post-treatment as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Total Score comparing the Cingal, TH, and Placebo arms. WOMAC Total Score combines the three 0-to-100 point scores from the WOMAC Pain Score, the WOMAC Stiffness Score, and the WOMAC Function Score to calculate a TOTAL Score from 0 = No Symptoms to 100 = Highest Degrees of Pain, Stiffness and Functional Limitation Symptoms. A negative value for the change from Baseline in WOMAC Total Score indicates reduction in pain, stiffness, and improved function. A larger negative value indicates a better overall clinical outcome. | 26 Weeks |
| Change From Baseline in the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score | The change from Baseline in knee pain post-treatment as measured by the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score comparing the Cingal, TH, and Placebo arms. PGA Score records participant responses to their assessment of how much their STUDY (treated) knee is bothering them today . The PGA Score is a validated 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm = No Pain to 100 mm = Extreme Pain. A negative value for the change from Baseline indicates improvement in PGA Score. A larger negative value indicates less pain, and a better clinical outcome. | 26 Weeks |
| Change From Baseline in the Evaluator Global Assessment (EGA) Score | The change from Baseline in knee pain post-treatment as measured by the Evaluator Global Assessment (EGA) Score comparing the Cingal, TH, and Placebo arms. EGA Score records the Study Evaluator's assessment of how much the patient's STUDY (treated) knee is bothering them today . The EGA Score is a validated 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm = No Pain to 100 mm = Extreme Pain. A negative value for the change from Baseline indicates improvement in EGA Score. A larger negative value indicates less pain, and a better clinical outcome. | 26 Weeks |
| The Usage of Rescue Medication (Acetaminophen/Paracetamol) at 26 Weeks | The usage of Rescue Medication (RM) as based on the average number of acetominophen/paracetamol pills taken among participants at 26 Weeks post treatment comparing between the Cingal, Triamcinolone Hexacetonide (TH) and Placebo arms. A smaller value in average RM indicates that fewer pills were taken by the participants, which may correlate to a better clinical outcome in terms of pain. | 26 Weeks |
| Valley Bone and Joint Specialists |
| Chandler |
| Arizona |
| 85224 |
| United States |
| Tucson Orthopaedic Institute | Tucson | Arizona | 85712 | United States |
| Advanced Research Center, Inc. | Anaheim | California | 92805 | United States |
| Medvin Clinical Research | Covina | California | 91722 | United States |
| Core Orthopaedic Medical Center (San Dieguito Orthopedic Medical Center) | Encinitas | California | 92024 | United States |
| Infinity Clinical Research | Norco | California | 92860 | United States |
| Dream Team Clinical Research | Pomona | California | 91767 | United States |
| Probe Clinical Research Corporation | Riverside | California | 92501 | United States |
| Artemis Institute for Clinical Research, Riverside | Riverside | California | 92503 | United States |
| Artemis Institute for Clinical Research, San Marcos | Summerville | California | 29485 | United States |
| Medvin Clinical Research | Tujunga | California | 91042 | United States |
| Medvin Clinical Research | Whittier | California | 90602 | United States |
| Tampa Bay Medical Research Inc | Clearwater | Florida | 33761 | United States |
| Shrock Research | Fort Lauderdale | Florida | 33316 | United States |
| Pines Clinical Research, Inc | Hollywood | Florida | 33024 | United States |
| Ascension Research | Pinellas Park | Florida | 33781 | United States |
| Precision Clinical Research, LLC | Sunrise | Florida | 33351 | United States |
| Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
| Best Clinical Trials, LLC | New Orleans | Louisiana | 70115 | United States |
| Anika Therapeutics | Bedford | Massachusetts | 01730 | United States |
| Upstate Clinical Research Associates, LLC | Williamsville | New York | 14221 | United States |
| PMG Research of Wilmington, LLC | Wilmington | North Carolina | 28403 | United States |
| Coastal Carolina Research Center (CCRC) | Mt. Pleasant | South Carolina | 29464-3803 | United States |
| Palmetto Clinical Research | Summerville | South Carolina | 29485 | United States |
| Spectrum Medical, Inc. | Danville | Virginia | 24541 | United States |
Single injection of a 1 ml dose of Triamcinolone Hexacetonide (TH) containing 20 mg/ml TH
| FG002 | Placebo | Single injection of a 4 ml unit dose of Placebo containing 0.9% saline |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Cingal | Single injection of a 4 ml unit dose of Cingal containing 88 mg (22 mg/mL) of cross-linked sodium hyaluronate and 18 mg (4.5 mg/mL) of triamcinolone hexacetonide (TH) |
| BG001 | Triamcinolone Hexacetonide (TH) | Single injection of a 1 ml dose of Triamcinolone Hexacetonide (TH) containing 20 mg/ml TH |
| BG002 | Placebo | Single injection of a 4 ml dose of Placebo containing 0.9% saline |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Index Knee | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score | The change from Baseline in knee pain post-treatment as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score comparing the Cingal arm to the TH arm, the Cingal arm to the Placebo arm, and the TH arm to the Placebo arm. WOMAC Pain is a validated 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm = No Pain to 100 mm = Highest Pain Level. A negative value for the change from Baseline indicates improvement in the WOMAC Pain Score, i.e. less pain post-treatment. A larger negative value indicates lower pain levels and a better outcome. | Intent To Treat (ITT) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 26 Weeks |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score | The change from Baseline in knee pain post-treatment as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score comparing the Cingal arm to the TH arm, the Cingal arm to the Placebo arm, and the TH arm to the Placebo arm. WOMAC Pain is a validated 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm = No Pain to 100 mm = Highest Pain Level. A negative number for the change from Baseline indicates improvement in the WOMAC Pain Score, i.e. less pain post-treatment. | Intent To Treat (ITT) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 18 Weeks |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score | The change from Baseline in knee pain post-treatment as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score comparing the Cingal arm to the TH arm, the Cingal arm to the Placebo arm, and the TH arm to the Placebo arm. WOMAC Pain is a validated 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm = No Pain to 100 mm = Highest Pain Level. A negative number for the change from Baseline indicates improvement in the WOMAC Pain Score, i.e. less pain post-treatment. | Intent To Treat (ITT) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 12 Weeks |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score | The change from Baseline in knee pain post-treatment as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score comparing the Cingal arm to the TH arm, the Cingal arm to the Placebo arm, and the TH arm to the Placebo arm. WOMAC Pain is a validated 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm = No Pain to 100 mm = Highest Pain Level. A negative number for the change from Baseline indicates improvement in the WOMAC Pain Score, i.e. less pain post-treatment. | Intent To Treat (ITT) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 6 Weeks |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score | The change from Baseline in knee pain post-treatment as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score comparing the Cingal arm to the TH arm, the Cingal arm to the Placebo arm, and the TH arm to the Placebo arm. WOMAC Pain is a validated 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm = No Pain to 100 mm = Highest Pain Level. A negative number for the change from Baseline indicates improvement in the WOMAC Pain Score, i.e. less pain post-treatment. | Intent To Treat (ITT) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 3 Weeks |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score | The change from Baseline in knee pain post-treatment as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score comparing the Cingal arm to the TH arm, the Cingal arm to the Placebo arm, and the TH arm to the Placebo arm. WOMAC Pain is a validated 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm = No Pain to 100 mm = Highest Pain Level. A negative number for the change from Baseline indicates improvement in the WOMAC Pain Score, i.e. less pain post-treatment. | Intent To Treat (ITT) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 Week |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Outcomes Measures for Rheumatic Arthritis Clinical Trials-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Responder Index | The post-treatment responder rate is determined through a calculation defined by the Outcomes Measures for Rheumatic Arthritis Clinical Trials-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Responder Index. The OMERACT-OARSI Responder Index reports the percentage of subjects that met the criteria to be a good responder to treatment. The criteria for response are (1) improvement in pain or physical function >50% and an absolute change >20 mm; or (2) improvement of >20% with an absolute change >10 mm in at least of the following three categories: pain, physical function, and patient's global assessment. A higher percentage of subjects responding indicates a better outcome. OMERACT-OARSI responder rates were compared between the Cingal, TH and Placebo arms. | Intent To Treat (ITT) | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 26 Weeks |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Knee Pain as Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score | Change in knee pain was obtained from participant responses using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score at each time point. This VAS scale ranged from 0 mm = No Pain to 100 mm = Highest Pain Level. A negative value for the change in pain indicates less pain post-treatment. A larger negative value indicates a higher level of improvement, and a better outcome. | Intent To Treat (ITT) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 26 Weeks |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Knee Pain as Measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score | Change in knee pain was obtained from participant responses using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score. This NRS Pain Score ranged from 0 = No Pain to 10 = Highest Pain Level. A negative value for the change in Pain Score indicates less pain post-treatment. A larger negative value indicates a higher level of improvement, and a better outcome. | Intent To Treat (ITT) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 26 Weeks |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Function Score | The change from Baseline in knee function post-treatment as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Function Score comparing the Cingal, TH, and Placebo arms. WOMAC Function Score records participant responses regarding the difficulty they have performing daily activities. The WOMAC Function Score is a validated 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm = No Difficulty to 100 mm = Extreme Difficulty. A negative value for the change from Baseline indicates improvement in WOMAC Function Score. A larger negative value indicates improvement in performing daily activities, and a better outcome. | Intent To Treat (ITT) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 26 Weeks |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Score | The change from Baseline in knee stiffness post-treatment as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Score comparing the Cingal, TH, and Placebo arms. WOMAC Stiffness Score records participant responses regarding the sensation of ease in moving their joint. The WOMAC Stiffness Score is a validated 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm = No Stiffness to 100 mm = Extreme Stiffness. A negative value for the change from Baseline indicates improvement in WOMAC Stiffness Score. A larger negative value indicates less stiffness, and a better outcome. | Intent To Treat (ITT) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 26 Weeks |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Total Score | The change from Baseline in overall clinical improvement in the knee post-treatment as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Total Score comparing the Cingal, TH, and Placebo arms. WOMAC Total Score combines the three 0-to-100 point scores from the WOMAC Pain Score, the WOMAC Stiffness Score, and the WOMAC Function Score to calculate a TOTAL Score from 0 = No Symptoms to 100 = Highest Degrees of Pain, Stiffness and Functional Limitation Symptoms. A negative value for the change from Baseline in WOMAC Total Score indicates reduction in pain, stiffness, and improved function. A larger negative value indicates a better overall clinical outcome. | Intent To Treat (ITT) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 26 Weeks |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score | The change from Baseline in knee pain post-treatment as measured by the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score comparing the Cingal, TH, and Placebo arms. PGA Score records participant responses to their assessment of how much their STUDY (treated) knee is bothering them today . The PGA Score is a validated 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm = No Pain to 100 mm = Extreme Pain. A negative value for the change from Baseline indicates improvement in PGA Score. A larger negative value indicates less pain, and a better clinical outcome. | Intent To Treat (ITT) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 26 Weeks |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Evaluator Global Assessment (EGA) Score | The change from Baseline in knee pain post-treatment as measured by the Evaluator Global Assessment (EGA) Score comparing the Cingal, TH, and Placebo arms. EGA Score records the Study Evaluator's assessment of how much the patient's STUDY (treated) knee is bothering them today . The EGA Score is a validated 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm = No Pain to 100 mm = Extreme Pain. A negative value for the change from Baseline indicates improvement in EGA Score. A larger negative value indicates less pain, and a better clinical outcome. | Intent To Treat (ITT) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 26 Weeks |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Usage of Rescue Medication (Acetaminophen/Paracetamol) at 26 Weeks | The usage of Rescue Medication (RM) as based on the average number of acetominophen/paracetamol pills taken among participants at 26 Weeks post treatment comparing between the Cingal, Triamcinolone Hexacetonide (TH) and Placebo arms. A smaller value in average RM indicates that fewer pills were taken by the participants, which may correlate to a better clinical outcome in terms of pain. | Intent To Treat (ITT) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Pills | 26 Weeks |
|
Adverse Events were collected from the time of the Baseline Study Visit until Study Completion at 26 Weeks.
The definitions of adverse events and serious adverse events is the same as used in the clinicaltrials.gov definitions.
The incidence, timing, severity, and relationship to treatment of all Adverse Events (AE) were collected and coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Cingal | Single injection of chemically cross-linked sodium hyaluronate supplied as a 4 mL unit dose with a nominal 18 mg of triamcinolone hexacetonide (TH) | 0 | 99 | 1 | 99 | 58 | 99 |
| EG001 | Triamcinolone Hexacetonide (TH) | Single injection of TH 20 mg/ml supplied as 1 mL unit dose | 0 | 99 | 1 | 99 | 29 | 99 |
| EG002 | Placebo | Single injection of 0.9% saline supplied as a 4 mL unit dose | 0 | 33 | 0 | 33 | 5 | 33 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypoxia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Delerium | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypothyroidism | Endocrine disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection site haematoma | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection Site irritation | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection site joint pain | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection site pain | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral swelling | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Seasonal allergy | Immune system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abcess limb | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bacterial food poisoning | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bursitis infective | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ear infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Herpes zoster | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hordeolum | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Localized infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tooth infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthropod sting | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ligament sprain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Meniscus injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle strain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Radius fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suture related complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Synovial rupture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thermal burn | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bursitis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Groin pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intervertebral disc protrusion | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint effusion | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint stiffness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spinal stenosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Synovial cyst | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Synovitis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vertebral foraminal stenosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Carpal tunnel syndrome | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sciatica | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transient global amnesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nephrolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Breast fibrosis | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint swelling | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
There were no limitations or caveats associated with the conduct of this trial.
PI shall not publish Index or the WOMAC® User Guide in any publication, on the Internet or any other public access medium. NICHOLAS BELLAMY, MD, MSc, DSc, MBA, FRACP shall be acknowledged as the source of the Index. Results at the Institution shall not be made before the first multi-site publication by Sponsor. If no multi-site publication within18 months after the Trial completion, PI has right to publish and or present its results (but not the results of any other site) from the Trial.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kara Mezger, Executive Director Clinical Affairs | Anika Therapeutics | 781.457.9000 | kmezger@anika.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 26, 2020 | Jun 11, 2023 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C482498 | 3,6,9,16,19,22-hexaaza-6,19-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)tricyclo(22,2,2,2(11,14))triaconta-1,11,13,24,27,29-hexaene |
| C005900 | triamcinolone hexacetonide |
| D012965 | Sodium Chloride |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002712 | Chlorides |
| D006851 | Hydrochloric Acid |
| D017606 | Chlorine Compounds |
| D007287 | Inorganic Chemicals |
| D017670 | Sodium Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Index Knee - Left |
|
| Superiority |
| ANOVA | 0.7601 | Superiority |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Placebo |
Single injection of a 4 ml unit dose of Placebo containing 0.9% saline |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single injection of a 4 ml unit dose of Placebo containing 0.9% saline
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|