Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| James A. Haley Veterans Administration Hospital | FED |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a sleep disorder common among Veterans with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Untreated OSA increases risk of poor health outcomes including cognitive impairment, declining mental and physical health, and premature mortality. Positive airway pressure (PAP) is the frontline treatment for OSA that effectively reduces many negative health consequences of the disease. Unfortunately, PAP adherence is poor. A recent study showed that 68% of Veterans with moderate-to-severe TBI and OSA were nonadherent to PAP therapy. Psychoeducation is the standard of care for OSA treatment with PAP, but on its own is insufficient for improving adherence. Alternatives to the standard of care include evidence-based behavioral interventions such as Motivational Interviewing (MI) and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) which have been shown to improve PAP adherence in general sleep clinic samples. Unfortunately, these evidence-based interventions (designed for cognitively intact individuals) have not been adapted to address PAP adherence in persons with moderate-to-severe TBI, who often require cognitive accommodations. The goal of this study is to test the feasibility of a novel manualized intervention, designed with cognitive accommodations, and informed by MI and CBT, to address PAP adherence in Veterans with TBI and OSA.
Study Aims: Study Aim 1 tested the feasibility and acceptability of delivering the PAP adherence intervention. Study Aim 2 evaluated the feasibility of outcome and process measures.
Method: Veterans were recruited from inpatient and outpatient TBI and sleep clinics. Those meeting eligibility criteria (diagnosis of OSA and moderate-to-severe TBI; nonadherent to PAP, able to provide informed consent) were invited to participate in the 4-session intervention followed by a qualitative interview to inquire about intervention acceptability. Study measures (e.g., symptom severity, sleep quality of life), will be administered pre- and post-intervention.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is condition. The frontline treatment is Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) therapy. Adherence to PAP is essential to reap the therapeutic benefit of the treatment. Psychoeducation is part of the standard of care for the treatment of OSA, but on its own has been shown to be ineffective in improving PAP adherence. In persons without brain injury, alternatives to standard education, such as Motivational Interviewing (MI) and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), have been shown to improve PAP adherence. To date, no published studies have examined maximizing frontline PAP treatment for persons with brain injury. Therefore, the objective of this study is to develop and test the feasibility of a manualized intervention, derived from evidence-based MI and CBT, and adapted with cognitive accommodations, to maximize PAP success in Veterans with OSA and TBI-related burden.
This is a 2-year mixed methods study using quantitative and qualitative inquiry to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a novel 4-session PAP adherence intervention (Aim 1). Feasibility is the ease to which the intervention can be delivered (e.g., eligibility rates, recruitment rates), and acceptability is the extent to which persons receiving the intervention consider it appropriate (e.g., satisfaction ratings). Feasibility of process and the ultimate outcome measures (e.g., completeness, perceived value and burden) will also be examined (Aim 2).
Participants will be recruited from clinics within the James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital (JAHVH), a tertiary care facility and teaching hospital. Participants will be recruited from three clinical settings: (1) inpatient TBI neurorehabilitation; (2) outpatient TBI clinics; and (3) sleep medicine clinic. Inclusion criteria for this study are as follows: (1) moderate-to-severe TBI; (2) diagnosed with OSA and prescribed PAP therapy; (3) are nonadherent to PAP treatment; and (4) able to consent. The plan is to enroll 19 participants, because -- using a conservative 75% retention estimate - it is expected that 14 will complete the intervention, exceeding the minimum for data saturation.
Upon receipt of consent, the pre-intervention study measures will be administered. Veterans will be scheduled for four treatment sessions. After the final session, participants will complete post-intervention measures. The intervention will be delivered by a doctoral level psychologist. Two independent evaluators will listen to 20% of audio-recorded sessions and conduct intervention fidelity checks using a Fidelity Rating Checklist created for this study by the PI, and adapted from other rating MI and CBT fidelity forms. Of the recordings, 10% will be the same session to conduct interrater reliability checks of the ratings. Participants will be contacted within 15 business days of their last intervention session for the qualitative interview to gather information on acceptability of the intervention. The project manager/research assistant will download objective PAP adherence data from the PAP software program during study pre-screening and 30 days following the last intervention session, to permit evaluation of adherence.
Analysis will include examination of persons enrolled and retained versus study eligible, and reasons for non-enrollment. Attendance will be described. Acceptability will be examined via the post-intervention interview. Identification of themes will be generated from the analysis using a constant comparative approach. The qualitative team will independently read the data, assign labels and codes to data segments, and develop initial themes, then meet to develop consensus on initial themes and codes, revising them using an iterative process, confirming evidence and consider rival explanations that contrast with findings and conclusions. Study measures. Pre- and post-intervention measures which will be examined for completeness. Descriptive data will be presented (e.g., central tendency, variability, change scores, and effect sizes).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention (single arm) | Experimental | This is a 4-session intervention derived from Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavior Therapy and adapted with cognitive accommodations. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MI and CBT 4-session manualized intervention | Behavioral | This is a 4-session intervention derived from Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavior Therapy and adapted with cognitive accommodations. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Narrative Evaluation of Intervention Interview (Post-intervention Qualitative Interview) | The Narrative Evaluation of Intervention Interview is a 16-item semi-structured interview that elicits participant feedback about an intervention. The data yielded by the NEII are qualitative, using qualitative thematic analysis. All 13 participants who completed the study also completed the NEII interview. | Post-intervention (up to 8 weeks after completion of the single arm intervention) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Epworth Sleepiness Scale | The Epworth Sleepiness Scale is an 8-item validated measure of daytime sleepiness. Respondents rate how likely they are to doze in eight situations, each on a scale from 0 to 3. Scores range from 0 to 24. Higher scores representing greater levels of excessive sleepiness | Single time point, following completion of the single arm intervention, up to 12 weeks post-intervention |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Marc A Silva, PhD | James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL | Tampa | Florida | 33612 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36355639 | Derived | Silva MA, Arriola NB, Radwan CK, Womble BM, Healey EA, Lee JM, Aloia MS, Nakase-Richardson R. Improving sleep apnea treatment adherence after traumatic brain injury: A nonrandomized feasibility study. Rehabil Psychol. 2022 Nov;67(4):461-473. doi: 10.1037/rep0000473. |
Not provided
| ID | Type | URL | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Informed Consent Form | View IPD |
A Limited Dataset (LDS) will be created and shared pursuant to a Data Use Agreement (DUA) appropriately limiting use of the dataset and prohibiting the recipient from identifying or re-identifying (or taking steps to identify or re-identify) any individual whose data are included in the dataset.
Will be available starting twelve months following publication of study findings.
Data are not publicly available. Information will be shared by contacting the study PI and upon institutional approval.
Not provided
All 17 participants who agreed to participate were enrolled in the study and assigned to the single arm of the study.
Participants were recruited from inpatient TBI units and outpatient TBI clinics per IRB-approved protocol. The recruitment period occurred between August 2020 and December 2021.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Intervention (Single Arm) | This is a 4-session intervention derived from Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavior Therapy and adapted with cognitive accommodations. MI and CBT 4-session manualized intervention: This is a 4-session intervention derived from Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavior Therapy and adapted with cognitive accommodations. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Intervention (Single Arm) | This is a 4-session intervention derived from Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavior Therapy and adapted with cognitive accommodations. MI and CBT 4-session manualized intervention: This is a 4-session intervention derived from Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavior Therapy and adapted with cognitive accommodations. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Narrative Evaluation of Intervention Interview (Post-intervention Qualitative Interview) | The Narrative Evaluation of Intervention Interview is a 16-item semi-structured interview that elicits participant feedback about an intervention. The data yielded by the NEII are qualitative, using qualitative thematic analysis. All 13 participants who completed the study also completed the NEII interview. | Posted | Number | Themes | Post-intervention (up to 8 weeks after completion of the single arm intervention) |
|
Adverse events time frame was between August 2020 (starting enrollment) until June 2022 (end of study). For each participant, adverse events monitoring occurred between time of study enrollment and either (1) time completed all study procedures, or (2) time participant withdrew from study. The adverse event monitoring period lasted for 1 year and 10 months. For the study sample as a whole, the average monitoring period was 139.6 days (or an average of 20 weeks or 4.6 months).
Definitions of adverse and serious adverse events are the clinicaltrials.gov definitions.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Intervention (Single Arm) | This is a 4-session intervention derived from Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavior Therapy and adapted with cognitive accommodations. MI and CBT 4-session manualized intervention: This is a 4-session intervention derived from Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavior Therapy and adapted with cognitive accommodations. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Marc A Silva | James A Haley Veterans' Hospital | 813-972-2000 | 5613 | marc.silva1@va.gov |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Oct 24, 2019 | Jan 30, 2020 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 15, 2022 | Feb 9, 2023 | SAP_002.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Apr 29, 2021 | Mar 31, 2022 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020181 | Sleep Apnea, Obstructive |
| D000070642 | Brain Injuries, Traumatic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012891 | Sleep Apnea Syndromes |
| D001049 | Apnea |
| D012120 | Respiration Disorders |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants will be asked to participate in four treatment sessions. The 4-session intervention is derived from evidence-based Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavior Therapy. Participants will complete study measures pre- and post-intervention. Then, they will participate in a post-intervention interview to gather information of acceptability.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Fatigue Severity Scale | The Fatigue Severity Scale is a 9-item measure that is sensitive to change following OSA treatment. Respondents rate (on a scale from 1 to 7) the degree of fatigue symptoms experienced within the past 7 days. Total scores range from 9 to 63. Higher scores denote worse fatigue. | Single time point, following completion of the single arm intervention, up to 12 weeks post-intervention |
| Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire | The Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire is a 30-item instrument that measures the impact of excessive sleepiness on quality of life in five domains. Items are rated from 1 to 4. Scores range from 1 to 120. Lower scores denote greater impact on quality of life. | Single time point, following completion of the single arm intervention, up to 12 weeks post-intervention |
| Study Protocol | View IPD |
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) | Mean | Standard Deviation | Events per hour |
|
| Oxygenation Nadir | Oxygen nadir during polysomnographic study measured via pulse oximeter was abstracted from existing medical records, per study protocol. Oxygen nadir is a metric that refers to the lowest point of peripheral oxygen saturation, which can range theoretically from 0% to 100%. | Mean | Standard Deviation | % peripheral oxygen saturation |
|
| Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) | The GOS-E is rated on an ordinal scale, 8 levels, ranging from 1 to 8 with higher scores indicating greater (better) outcome. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) | The FSS is a 9-item measure of self-reported fatigue severity. Items are rated from 1 (disagree) to 7 (agree) with higher scores denoting greater symptom severity. Total scores range from 9 to 63. Higher scores reflect greater self-reported fatigue. | 1 participant did not complete the FSS | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Functional Outcome of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) | The FOSQ is a 30-item instrument. Each item is rated on a score from 1 to 4, with lower scores denoting worse functional impact (worse outcome). The 30 items represent functioning across 5 life domains. The 5 life domain scores are the average of the items within that domain. The total score (reported in this study) ranges from 5 to 20 and is an average of the 5 domain scores. | 2 participants did not complete the FOSQ | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| OSA Treatment Barriers Questionnaire (OTBQ) | The OTBQ is a 6-item self-report measure of perceived treatment barriers. Each item is rated on a score from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score ranges from 6 to 30. Higher scores denoting greater perceived OSA treatment barriers. | 2 participants did not complete the OTBQ | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Self Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea (SEMSA) Risk Perception | The SEMSA is a 26 item self-report measure of a person's perception of personal risk of susceptibility and consequences of untreated OSA (Risk Perception), expectations of personal health outcome following treatment for OSA (Treatment Outcome Expectancies), and perception that one can successfully manage their OSA (Self Efficacy). Each item is rated on a scale from 1 to 4. The SEMSA Risk Perception subscale is 8 items. Score range is 1 to 32, with higher scores denoting greater perceived risk. | 2 participants did not complete the SEMSA Risk Perception | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Self Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea (SEMSA) Outcome Expectancies | The SEMSA is a 26 item self-report measure of a person's perception of personal risk of susceptibility and consequences of untreated OSA (Risk Perception), expectations of personal health outcome following treatment for OSA (Treatment Outcome Expectancies), and perception that one can successfully manage their OSA (Self Efficacy). Each item is rated on a scale from 1 to 4. The Treatment Outcome Expectancies subscale is 9 items. Score range is 1 to 36, with higher scores denoting greater perceived treatment benefit. | 2 participants did not complete the SEMSA Outcome Expectancies | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Self Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea (SEMSA) Treatment Self-efficacy | The SEMSA is a 26 item self-report measure of a person's perception of personal risk of susceptibility and consequences of untreated OSA (Risk Perception), expectations of personal health outcome following treatment for OSA (Treatment Outcome Expectancies), and perception that one can successfully manage their OSA (Self Efficacy). Each item is rated on a scale from 1 to 4. The Self Efficacy subscale is 9 items. Score range is 1 to 36, with higher scores denoting greater perceived ability to manage their OSA. | 2 participants did not complete the SEMSA Treatment Self-Efficacy | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) | The ESS is an 8-item measure. Items are rated from 0 to 4, with higher scores denoting greater symptom severity. | 2 participants did not complete the ESS | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Epworth Sleepiness Scale | The Epworth Sleepiness Scale is an 8-item validated measure of daytime sleepiness. Respondents rate how likely they are to doze in eight situations, each on a scale from 0 to 3. Scores range from 0 to 24. Higher scores representing greater levels of excessive sleepiness | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Single time point, following completion of the single arm intervention, up to 12 weeks post-intervention |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Fatigue Severity Scale | The Fatigue Severity Scale is a 9-item measure that is sensitive to change following OSA treatment. Respondents rate (on a scale from 1 to 7) the degree of fatigue symptoms experienced within the past 7 days. Total scores range from 9 to 63. Higher scores denote worse fatigue. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Single time point, following completion of the single arm intervention, up to 12 weeks post-intervention |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire | The Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire is a 30-item instrument that measures the impact of excessive sleepiness on quality of life in five domains. Items are rated from 1 to 4. Scores range from 1 to 120. Lower scores denote greater impact on quality of life. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Single time point, following completion of the single arm intervention, up to 12 weeks post-intervention |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 17 |
| 0 |
| 17 |
| 0 |
| 17 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D020919 |
| Sleep Disorders, Intrinsic |
| D020920 | Dyssomnias |
| D012893 | Sleep Wake Disorders |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D001930 | Brain Injuries |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D006259 | Craniocerebral Trauma |
| D020196 | Trauma, Nervous System |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |