Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Spine radiosurgery (SRS) utilizes advanced treatment planning with focused x-rays to deliver one to four high dose treatments to the spine to help relieve pain and/or neurologic symptoms. Spine SRS uses special equipment to position the participant and guide the focused beams toward the area to be treated and away from normal tissue.
One of the side effects of spine SRS is the development of vertebral compression fractures, many of which are not painful. The goal of this study is to compare the effects, good and/or bad, of spine SRS given in 1 or 2 treatments. Our main goal is to find out which approach will reduce the chances of developing vertebral compression fractures.
The primary objective of this study is to establish the non-inferiority in vertebral compression fracture (VCF) incidence at 6 months between single-fraction and two-fraction sSRS.
Other objectives are to to evaluate the 12-month impact of single- and two-fraction sSRS on local control (LC), pain control (PC), quality of life (QOL), and toxicity (specifically, pain flare, radiation esophagitis/laryngitis/pharyngitis, and radiation myelitis)
This study is planned as a two-arm randomized phase II trial to establish non-inferiority of single fraction sSRS compared to two-fraction sSRS. Approximately 130 participants will be enrolled in this trial; 65 participants in each arm:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 - Single fraction | Experimental | sSRS 18 Gy in 1 fraction |
|
| Arm 2 - Two fraction | Active Comparator | sSRS 24 Gy in 2 fractions |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic MRI | Device | Diagnostic MRI |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 6-month cumulative incidence of Vertebral Compression Fracture (VCF) associated with single- and two-fraction sSRS | 6-month cumulative incidence of Vertebral Compression Fracture (VCF) associated with single- and two-fraction sSRS Each treated vertebra will be assessed individually for VCF during radiologic follow-up | At baseline and for each subsequent follow-up MRI (at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Local control (LC) as defined as absence of local progression of disease In the event of disease progression, all cases will be reviewed at the multi-disciplinary spine tumor board for a consensus recommendation | LC as defined as absence of local progression of disease, which include the following:
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samuel T Chao, MD | Contact | 1-866-223-8100 | TaussigResearch@ccf.org | |
| Ehsan Balagamwala, MD | Contact | 1-866-223-8100 | balagae@ccf.org |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Samuel Chao, MD | Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center | Recruiting | Cleveland | Ohio | 44195 | United States |
All IPD that underlie results in publication, after de-identification
Not provided
1 year after last participant is enrolled. Data will be available for a total of 2 years
Investigators whose purposed use of the data has been approved by the Cleveland Clinic Independent Review Committee. Data will be provided for individual participant meta-analysis. All requests must be made in writing to Sam Chao, MD (Chaos@ccf.org) or Ehsan Balagamwala (Balagae@ccf.org).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Planning MRI |
| Device |
Planning MRI: high definition (HD) MRI of the region of interest (1 vertebral level above and below the level(s) being treated) |
|
| Simulation CT | Other | Simulation CT is obtained (1.5 mm slice thickness) |
|
| QOL assessment | Other | QOL assessment |
|
| Brief pain inventory (BPI) | Other | Brief pain inventory (BPI), including narcotic assessment |
|
| sSRS in 1 fraction | Radiation | sSRS 18 Gy in 1 fraction |
|
| sSRS in 2 fraction | Radiation | sSRS 24 Gy in 2 fractions to be delivered either on consecutive days or one day apart. |
|
| At baseline and for each subsequent follow-up MRI (at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment) |
| Pain control (PC) as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) | PC at each treated vertebral level assessed by the BPI [9 item questionnaire (range: 0-10), higher scores = worse pain], then defined by RTOG 0631 as follows: Complete relief (CR): Pain score of 0 at index site 3 mo post-treatment. CR is requisite of no increase in narcotic analgesics. Partial relief (PR): Reduction in BPI of ≥ 3 points at index site, provided other treated lesions have increased in pain score and participant did not require increase in narcotic analgesics for site of interest. Participants needing increase in narcotics for site will not be scored as having PR. Those needing increase in narcotics for a distant site will remain eligible for CR/PR. Stable response (SR): Post-treatment pain score same as or within 2 points of baseline score at index site with no increase in narcotic analgesics for site of interest. Progressive pain: Post-treatment increase of at least 3 points from baseline pain score at index site or increase in narcotics for site of interest. | At baseline and for each subsequent follow-up MRI (at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment) |
| Quality of life (QOL) assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 (with BM22) | Quality of life as measured by (EORTC QOL-C30) - 30 items that are grouped into five scales functional (physical, social, emotional functioning, cognitive and role), three scales of symptoms (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting), a global scale of health / quality of life and a number of related individual items with the symptoms of the disease and its treatment, as well as an item of economic impact. The answers to the items on the scales refer to "last week," except the patient's physical functioning scale whose time frame is the present. These answers obey a Likert format, which ranges from 1 ("Not at all") and 4 ("A lot") | At baseline and for each subsequent follow-up MRI (at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment) |
| Toxicity as assessed by CTCAE V. 5.0 | Toxicity as assessed by criteria in the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Rates of grade 1-5 toxicities will be reported | At follow-up MRI (1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment) |