Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Jazz Pharmaceuticals | INDUSTRY |
| Adienne SA | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Treatment options for older adults with Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) and Myelodysplasia (MDS) are limited. Although stem cell transplantation remains one of the most effective treatments it is associated with severe side effects which have until recently prevented its use in older adults. In the last decade the use of reduced intensity transplants has allowed the extension of the potentially curative effect of transplantation to older patients in whom it was previously precluded. Although a major advance such transplants are associated with a high risk of disease relapse particularly in patients with high risk disease.
This study will evaluate new transplant strategies with the aim of improving the outcome of patients with AML and high risk MDS after stem cell transplantation. Three approaches to improve transplant outcome will be studied:
All patients will be followed up for a minimum of 2 years.
This is a randomised, international, phase II/III, multicentre, clinical trial in patients with AML and MDS undergoing allo-SCT. Patients with AML or MDS who fulfil the eligibility criteria will be invited to participate in the trial across centers performing allo-SCT.
Patients will be randomised to treatment based on a minimisation algorithm prepared at the Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU).
Randomisation 1 (R1) (closed to recruitment) will compare the novel consolidation therapy vyxeos with the standard consolidation therapy intermediate dose cytarabine.
Randomisation 2 (R2) will compare the novel conditioning regimen thiotepa/busulphan/fludarabine (TBF) with the standard conditioning therapy fludarabine/busulphan (FB4) in patients aged under 55 years of age.
Randomisation 3 (R3) will compare the novel conditioning regimen mini thiotepa/busulphan/fludarabine (mini TBF) with the standard regimen fludarabine/busulphan (FB2) in patients aged 55 years of age and over (or patients aged under 55 with comorbidities).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1: Intermediate dose Cytarabine | Active Comparator | First Randomisation (closed to recruitment) - control arm: Intermediate dose Cytarabine (1g/m^2 administered by intravenous infusion over 2 hours on days 1-5 inclusive) |
|
| R1: Vyxeos | Experimental | First Randomisation (closed to recruitment) - experimental arm: Vyxeos (29mg/65mg/m^2 administered by intravenous infusion over 90 minutes on days 1 and 3) |
|
| R2: FB4 | Active Comparator | Second Randomisation - under 55 years - control arm: Fludarabine (40mg/m^2 days -7, -6, -5, and -4), Busulphan (3.2mg/kg days -7, -6, -5 and -4) |
|
| R2: TBF | Experimental | Second Randomisation - under 55 years - experimental arm: Thiotepa (5mg/kg day -7 and -6), Busulphan (3.2mg/kg days -5, -4 and -3), Fludarabine (50mg/m^2 days -5, -4 and -3) |
|
| R3: FB2 | Active Comparator | Third Randomisation - 55 years and over (or under 55 with comorbidities) - control arm: Fludarabine (30mg/m^2 days -6, -5, -4, -3 and -2), Busulphan (3.2mg/kg days -6 and -5) |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vyxeos | Drug | Vyxeos administered by intravenous infusion |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall survival (all randomisations) | Defined as time from entering the relevant randomisation to the relevant question until death from any cause. Patients who are alive at the end of the trial or have been lost to follow up will be censored at their date last seen. For randomisations 2 and 3 this outcome will also be calculated as time from transplantation in order to run a sensitivity analysis. | 12 and 24 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in MRD status - R1 only | Change in minimal residual disease status. A patient will be categorised as either MRD status reduction (MRD positive to negative), MRD remain negative, MRD remain positive or MRD progression (MRD negative to positive) - Randomisation 1 only | Assessed at baseline and pre-transplant |
Not provided
Eligibility Criteria for Randomisation 1 (closed to recruitment) Inclusion Criteria for Randomisation 1
Patients (≥ 18 years old) with a morphological documented diagnosis of AML or MDS who are deemed fit for allo-SCT with one of the following disease characteristics:
AML
Patients with an identified HLA identical sibling or suitable matched unrelated donor (suitable match defined as no greater than a single allele mismatch at HLA-A, -B, -C, DQB1 or DRβ1)
Patients must be considered suitable/fit to undergo allo-SCT as clinically judged by the Local Investigator
Females of and male patients of reproductive potential (i.e., not post-menopausal or surgically sterilised) must use appropriate, highly effective, contraception from the point of commencing therapy until 6 months after treatment
Patients have given written informed consent
Patients willing and able to comply with scheduled study visits and laboratory tests Exclusion Criteria for Randomisation 1
Eligibility Criteria for Randomisation 2 Inclusion Criteria for Randomisation 2
Patients aged between 18 - 54 years with a morphological documented diagnosis of AML or MDS who are deemed fit for a MAC allo-SCT with one of the following disease characteristics: AML o Patients in 1st complete remission (CR1) defined as < 5% blasts
MDS
o Patients with advanced or high risk MDS (with an IPSS-R of ≥3.5 (intermediate 3.5 or higher) including intermediate or high risk CMML (e.g. CPSS int-2 or high risk), who have < 10% blasts at the time of randomisation following intensive chemotherapy (including R1 randomisation) or hypomethylating agents if necessary
Patients with an identified HLA identical sibling or suitable matched unrelated donor (suitable match defined as no greater than a single allele mismatch at HLA-A, -B, -C, DQB1 or DRβ1)
Patients with an ECOG performance status of 0, 1 or 2
Patients considered suitable/fit to undergo a MAC allo-SCT as clinically judged by the Local Investigator including:
Females of and male patients of reproductive potential (i.e., not post-menopausal or surgically sterilised) must use appropriate, highly effective, contraception from the point of commencing therapy until 12 months after treatment
Patients have given written informed consent
Patients willing and able to comply with scheduled study visits and laboratory tests Exclusion Criteria for Randomisation 2
1. Patients with contraindications to receiving a MAC allo-SCT 2. Female patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding. All women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test before commencing treatment 3. Adults of reproductive potential not willing to use appropriate, effective, contraception during the specified period 4. Patients with renal or hepatic impairment as clinically judged by the Local Investigator 5. Patients with active infection, HIV-positive or chronic active HBV or HCV 6. Patients with a prior malignancy, except lobular breast carcinoma in situ, fully resected basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of skin or treated cervical carcinoma in situ, incidental histologic finding of prostate cancer (T1a or T1b using the tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) clinical staging system), previous MDS, CMML, MPN resulting in secondary AML. Cancer treated with curative intent ≥ 5 years previously will be allowed. Cancer treated with curative intent < 5 years previously will not be allowed.
Eligibility Criteria for Randomisation 3 Inclusion Criteria for Randomisation 3 1. 1. Patients aged between 55 years or older with a morphological documented diagnosis of AML or MDS who are deemed fit for a RIC allo-SCT (or under the age of 55 with comorbidities which are deemed by the local investigator to preclude safe delivery of a MAC allo-SCT may be considered per investigators discretion) with one of the following disease characteristics: AML
MDS
Patients with advanced or high risk MDS (with an IPSS-R of ≥3.5 (intermediate 3.5 or higher) including intermediate or high risk CMML (e.g. CPSS int-2 or high rsk), who have < 10% blasts at the time of randomisation following intensive chemotherapy (including R1 randomisation) or hypomethylating agents if necessary 2. Patients with an identified HLA identical sibling or suitable matched unrelated donor (suitable match defined as no greater than a single allele mismatch at HLA-A, -B, -C, DQB1 or DRβ1) 3. Patients with an ECOG performance status of 0, 1 or 2 4. Patients considered suitable/fit to undergo a RIC allo-SCT as clinically judged by the Local Investigator including: a. Adequate hepatic and renal function as determined by full blood count and biochemistry assessment b. Resolution of any toxic effects of prior therapy (including radiotherapy, chemotherapy or surgical procedures) c. Performance of cardiac or pulmonary function tests (where there is a previous history of cardiac or pulmonary impairment 5. Females of and male patients of reproductive potential (i.e., not post-menopausal or surgically sterilised) must use appropriate, highly effective, contraception from the point of commencing therapy until 12 months after treatment 6. Patients have given written informed consent 7. Patients willing and able to comply with scheduled study visits and laboratory tests Exclusion Criteria for Randomisation 3
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Charles Craddock, Professor | University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Queen Elizabeth Hospital | Birmingham | United Kingdom | ||||
| University Hospitals Bristol |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Mini-TBF | Experimental | Third Randomisation - 55 years and over (or under 55 with comorbidities) - experimental arm: Thiotepa (5mg/kg day -6), Busulphan (3.2mg/kg days -5 and -4), Fludarabine (50mg/m^2 days -5, -4, and -3) |
|
| Fludarabine | Drug | Fludarabine administered by intravenous infusion |
|
|
| Busulphan | Drug | Busulphan administered by intravenous infusion |
|
|
| Thiotepa | Drug | Thiotepa administered by intravenous infusion |
|
|
| Cytarabine | Drug | Cytarabine administered by intravenous infusion |
|
|
| Disease-free survival |
DFS defined as time from randomisation to the relevant question to the first of relapse or death from any cause. Patients who are alive and disease free at the end of the trial will be censored at their date known to be alive. |
| From date of randomisation through to study completion, an average of 6 years |
| Cumulative incidence of disease relapse | CIR defined as time from randomisation to the relevant question to the date of relapse. Patients who die prior to relapse will be treated as a competing risk and patients who are alive and relapse free at the end of the trial will be censored at their date last seen. | From date of randomisation through to study completion, an average of 6 years |
| Non-relapse mortality | NRM defined as the time from randomisation to the relevant question to date of non-relapse death. Patients who die post-relapse will be treated as a competing risk and patients who are alive at the end of the trial will be censored at their date last seen. | From date of randomisation through to study completion, an average of 6 years |
| Quality of Life measured by EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaires, recorded at multiple timepoints - R2 and R3 only | The EORTC QLQ-C30 uses for the questions 1 to 28 a 4-point scale. The scale scores from 1 to 4 ("Not at all" to "Very much"). For the raw score, less points are considered to have a better outcome. For the questions 29 and 30 it uses a 7-points scale. The scale scores from 1 to 7 ("very poor" to "excellent"). More points are considered to have a better outcome. | Assessed at pre transplant, day 28 and months 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 |
| Quality of Life measured by EQ-5D questionnaires, recorded at multiple timepoints - R2 and R3 only | EQ5D is one of the most widely used health states descriptive system. EQ-5D questionnaires have 5 dimensions: "Mobility", "Human Autonomy," "Current Activities", "Pain / Discomfort", "Anxiety / Depression" and all dimensions are described by 3 problem levels corresponding to patient response choices. A quality of life score is obtained according to the answers to the questionnaires. | Assessed at pre transplant, day 28 and months 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 |
| Incidence of acute and chronic Graft versus Host Disease - R2 and R3 only | Incidence of acute and chronic GvHD of any grade - Randomisation 2 and 3 only | From date of randomisation through to study completion, an average of 6 years |
| Incidence of primary graft failure - R2 and R3 only | Defined as loss of donor cells after transplantation - Randomisation 2 and 3 only | From date of randomisation through to study completion, an average of 6 years |
| Incidence of toxicities reported as per CTCAE V4.0 | Defined as the number of patients who report one or more adverse event of grade 3 or higher or a serious adverse event of any grade | From start of treatment until 28 days after last dose of treatment |
| Bristol |
| United Kingdom |
| Addenbrooke's Hospital | Cambridge | United Kingdom |
| University Hospital of Wales | Cardiff | United Kingdom |
| Queen Elizabeth Hospital Glasgow | Glasgow | United Kingdom |
| St James' University Hospital | Leeds | United Kingdom |
| Leicester Royal Infirmary | Leicester | United Kingdom |
| Hammersmith Hospital | London | United Kingdom |
| King's College Hospital | London | United Kingdom |
| Manchester Royal Infirmary | Manchester | United Kingdom |
| Freeman Hospital | Newcastle | United Kingdom |
| Nottingham City Hospital | Nottingham | United Kingdom |
| Churchill Hospital | Oxford | United Kingdom |
| Derriford Hospital | Plymouth | United Kingdom |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015470 | Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007951 | Leukemia, Myeloid |
| D007938 | Leukemia |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D006402 | Hematologic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000629812 | CPX-351 |
| C024352 | fludarabine |
| C042382 | fludarabine phosphate |
| D002066 | Busulfan |
| D013852 | Thiotepa |
| D003561 | Cytarabine |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002072 | Butylene Glycols |
| D006018 | Glycols |
| D000438 | Alcohols |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D008698 | Mesylates |
| D000476 | Alkanesulfonates |
| D017738 | Alkanesulfonic Acids |
| D000473 | Alkanes |
| D006839 | Hydrocarbons, Acyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D013451 | Sulfonic Acids |
| D013456 | Sulfur Acids |
| D013457 | Sulfur Compounds |
| D063088 | Phosphoramides |
| D009943 | Organophosphorus Compounds |
| D013721 | Triethylenephosphoramide |
| D001388 | Aziridines |
| D001389 | Azirines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D003562 | Cytidine |
| D011741 | Pyrimidine Nucleosides |
| D011743 | Pyrimidines |
| D001087 | Arabinonucleosides |
| D009705 | Nucleosides |
| D009706 | Nucleic Acids, Nucleotides, and Nucleosides |
Not provided
Not provided