Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| BASEC Nr. 2017-01340 | Other Identifier | swissethics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Swiss Society of Endocrinology and Diabetology | UNKNOWN |
| Roche Diabetes Care | INDUSTRY |
| Sanofi | INDUSTRY |
| Concordia Versicherungen AG |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This observational study intends to evaluate the use and adherence of different types of primary care practices to the diabetes criteria-protocol (diabetes score), developed by the Swiss Society of Endocrinology and Diabetology. This diabetes score comprises visits to the doctor, lifestyle consultations, clinical measures such as blood pressure, cholesterol or blood sugar, as well as measures concerning the prevention of secondary complications like kidney, eye or feet issues. The participating primary care practices need to treat 80% of their diabetes patients (their "diabetes population") in accordance to the score-criteria. In addition to the adherence to the eight score-criteria, the practices are required to also document statistically if their diabetes patients get the following medication: oral antidiabetics, insulin, blood pressure medication, statins and / flu vaccine. As this observational study is and before-and-after study, the primary care practices need to document for each of their diabetes patients the care they provided in the year before the introduction of the score-criteria and in the year following their introduction. Participating primary care practices ask their diabetes patients' consent to the documentation and anonymous transmittance of their data. Data evaluation is anonymous and on a population-based level (as opposed to individual-based). The hypothesis of the study is to prove that the implementation of evidence-based measures, such as a diabetes score can increase the treatment quality of diabetes patients in primary care practices and this increase is independent of the primary care practice structure in which it is applied.
Information of the primary care practices regarding the background and goal of the project by means of a letter and informative documentation.
Recruitment of primary care practices, divided into three different practice organisations (individual practices and group practices run on a private basis and with financial autonomy, as well as forms of joint practices with employed physicians without financial autonomy).
A signed contract between QualiCCare and participating primary care practices regulates the collaboration.
Procedure:
A baseline documentation takes place retrospectively from the training/workshop for the past 12 months, and a second, prospective documentation of the treatment is done during the following 12 months.
Training of the participating general practioners (GP) and practice coordinator on the project including evaluation software, data entry and background to the criteria.
Documentation of the treatment quality of all patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 in a practice structure that meets the inclusion criteria according to the score criteria (baseline).
After 12 months, the treatment quality of the included patients with diabetes type 2 is recorded again using the same score.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| single primary care practices intervention | Independent primary care practices with one single medical doctor in the practice, usually ther owner of the practice working in his responsibility following the best practice procedure of the diabetes score. |
| |
| primary care group practice intervention | Independent primary care practices with more than one medical doctor working in their responsibility following the best practice procedure of the diabetes score. |
| |
| single primary care practices no intervention | Independent primary care practices with one single medical doctor in the practice, usually ther owner of the practice working in his responsibility without the intervention (not using Diabetes score) | ||
| primary care group practice no intervention | Independent primary care practices with more than one medical doctor working in their responsibility without the intervention (not using Diabetes score). |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best Practice Diabetes Management in Primary Care | Procedure | Practice adherence to best practice guidelines treating diabetes patients in different primary care practices is shown in this before- and after observational study |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in score result before and after the introduction of the diabetes score criteria for treatment of diabetes patients in the primary care setting | The change is measured at baseline, before the introduction of the diabetes score criteria and one year after the introduction. There are 8 score criteria for the good diabetes management in primary care (such as 1x/y lifestyle consultation, 1x/foot control, etc). Each criteria gets a certain number of points if 80% of the participating patients are treated in accordance to the given criteria. In total, a maximum of 100 points can be achieved. The objective is to achieved a minimum of 70% (= 70 points). | one year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of feasibility of the implementation of the diabetes score criteria in different primary care practice types | In order to test the feasibility of the use in different primary care practice types, the diabetes score criteria (as described above) are used in independent single practices and group practices. The above mentioned diabetes score consists of 8 score criteria concerning the diabetes management in primary care. The maximum amount of points are 100. it is desirable to achieve 70/100 points, whereas the points are attributed if 80% of the participating diabetes patients in the practice are treated according the the criteria. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Study population comprises two different kinds of primary care practices who either get the intervention or have no intervention (4 groups in total):
single practices with one general practioner and group practices with several general practitioners. On the practice level, the study population comprises all diabetes patients who correspond to the inclusion criteria.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Emanuel Christ, Prof. | University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hausarztmedizin KSSG | Sankt Gallen | Canton of St. Gallen | Switzerland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35925612 | Derived | Christ E, Czock A, Renstrom F, Ammeter T, Ebrahimi F, Zechmann S, Kutz A, Diem P, Hauptle C, Brandle M. Evaluation of type 2 diabetes care management in nine primary care practices before and after implementation of the Criteria of Good Disease Management of Diabetes established by the Swiss Society of Endocrinology and Diabetology. Swiss Med Wkly. 2022 Jul 26;152:w30197. doi: 10.4414/smw.2022.w30197. eCollection 2022 Jul 18. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| official guideline platform of the Swiss medical Society FMH | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP_ICF | Yes | Yes | Yes | Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form: Study protocol and statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 30, 2017 | Dec 31, 2019 | Prot_SAP_ICF_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form: Informed Consent Form document (translated) | Sep 2, 2017 | Jan 2, 2020 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003924 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011320 | Primary Health Care |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003191 | Comprehensive Health Care |
| D010346 | Patient Care Management |
| D006298 | Health Services Administration |
Not provided
Not provided
| UNKNOWN |
| Novo Nordisk A/S | INDUSTRY |
| Galenica | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| one year |
| Comparison of the diabetes treatment in regards to the different primary care settings | The resulting average score value of the diabetes treatment using the above described and mentioned diabetes score criteria in independent single primary care practices is compared with the resulting average score value of the diabetes treatment in group practices. The higher the score value, the better the treatment of diabetes patients in the respective practice structure (single or group practice). | one year |
| Evaluation of practice tool used for the documentation and evaluation of the diabetes score | The participating primary care practices evaluate the practice tool and give feedback in regards to practicality and applicability in the respective practice setting | one year |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |