Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This retrospective study evaluates 52 cases of avascular necrosis of femoral head (AVN) treated by core decompression, bone chips allograft, fibrin platelet rich-plasma (PRF) and concentrated autologous mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs).
We report 52 cases of avascular necrosis of the hip (AVN), operated by decompression of the necrotic area with bone chips allograft, adjuvanted by concentrated autologous mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and fibrin platelet rich-plasma (PRP).
The patients were followed-up at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and then every year. Each time a clinical evaluation by Harris Hip Score (HHS) was carried out by the same orthopedic surgeon. Radiological controls (pelvis and hip affected) were performed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and then every year.
The primary outcome evaluated was the avoiding or delaying of total hip replacement (THR), while the secondary outcomes were the assessment of any change in clinical performance as measured by Harris Hip Score
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hip avascular necrosis | Experimental | patients affected by avascular necrosis of the Hip classified by Japanese Investigation Committee criteria |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core decompression procedure | Procedure | Core Decompression with Bone Chips Allograft adjuvanted by Fibrin Platelet Rich-plasma (PRP) and Concentrated Autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCS), isolated from Bone Marrow |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Avoiding arthroplasty | The primary outcome evaluated was the avoiding or delaying of total hip replacement (THR) | 24 months after surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Harris Hip Score | The collection of functional outcomes score HHS at 6 weeks. The HHS is a measure of dysfunction so the higher the score, the better the outcome for the individual. The maximum score possible is 100. Results can be interpreted with the following: <70 as poor result; 70-80 as fair, 80-90 as good, and 90-100 as excellent results. | 6 weeks after surgery |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
- hip avascular necrosis
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Istituto Ortopedico Rizzli | Bologna | 40136 | Italy |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D025981 | Hip Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Harris Hip Score | The collection of functional outcomes score HHS at 3 month after surgery. The HHS is a measure of dysfunction so the higher the score, the better the outcome for the individual. The maximum score possible is 100. Results can be interpreted with the following: <70 as poor result; 70-80 as fair, 80-90 as good, and 90-100 as excellent results | 3 months after surgery |
| Harris Hip Score | The collection of functional outcomes score HHS at 6 month after surgery. The HHS is a measure of dysfunction so the higher the score, the better the outcome for the individual. The maximum score possible is 100. Results can be interpreted with the following: <70 as poor result; 70-80 as fair, 80-90 as good, and 90-100 as excellent results. | 6 months after surgery |
| Harris Hip Score | The collection of functional outcomes score HHS at 12 month after surgery. The HHS is a measure of dysfunction so the higher the score, the better the outcome for the individual. The maximum score possible is 100. Results can be interpreted with the following: <70 as poor result; 70-80 as fair, 80-90 as good, and 90-100 as excellent results. | 12 months after surgery |