| Primary | Percent of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission at Week 36 | Sustained remission at week 36, defined as: (1) Complete remission (absence of new lesions & epithelialization of old lesions) & off oral corticosteroids (OCS) no later than week 16 & (2) Absence of disease relapse (appearance of ≥3 new lesions a month [blisters, eczematous lesions, or urticarial plaques] or at least 1 large eczematous lesion or urticarial plaque that does not heal within 1 week) after completion of OCS taper, no later than week 16, to week 36 & (3) Absence of need for rescue therapy during 36 weeks (rescue therapy includes increase of OCS dose during the taper, re-initiation of OCS after completion of the OCS taper, or initiation of any BP-directed therapy). Participants with missing sustained remission data at week 36 due to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders & those with missing data due to other reasons were handled using multiple imputation. | | Posted | | Number | | Estimated Percentage of Participants | | At Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| | | Title | Denominators | Categories |
|---|
| | |
| | Group IDs | Group Description | Statistical Method | Statistical Comment | P-Value | P-Value Comment | Parameter Type | Parameter Value | Dispersion Type | Dispersion Value | Confidence Interval Sides | Confidence Interval % | CI Lower Limit | CI Upper Limit | CI Lower Limit Comment | CI Upper Limit Comment | Estimate Comment | Tested Non-Inferiority | Non-Inferiority Type | Non-Inferiority Comment | Other Analysis Description |
|---|
| | Barnard's exact test | | 0.0250 | | Risk Difference (RD) | 14.2 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 1.97 | 27.74 | | | | | Superiority | | 95% CI generated by Miettinen and Nurminen method |
|
| Secondary | Total Cumulative Dose of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) From Baseline to Week 36 | All participants in both treatment groups were started on OCS at randomization (day 1) with taper beginning no later than week 6 with the objective to taper off by week 16. OCS could be used as rescue treatment for loss of disease control/ disease relapse during the study. Days after non-OCS systemic rescue treatment use were imputed by the worst observation carried forward (WOCF) method (i.e., the highest daily OCS dose prior to any non-OCS systemic rescue treatment use). Missing data after study discontinuation were imputed with the average daily OCS dose among week 36 completers in each treatment group. | | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | milligrams (mg) | | Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent Change in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 36 | Peak pruritus NRS was used by participants to rate the intensity of pruritus during the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch possible. Participants were required to have a baseline peak pruritus NRS maximum intensity average of ≥4 during the 7 days prior to randomization for eligibility. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation. | All participants with available baseline data were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percentage of Change | | Baseline, Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) of Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS ≥4 From Baseline to Week 36 | Peak pruritus NRS was used by participants to rate the intensity of pruritus during the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch possible. Participants were required to have a baseline peak pruritus NRS maximum intensity average of ≥4 during the 7 days prior to randomization for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 36 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS. | All participants with available baseline data were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | | Number | | Estimated Percentage of Participants | | Baseline, Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent Change in Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) Activity Score From Baseline to Week 36 | BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation. | | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percentage of Change | | Baseline, Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Time to First Use of Rescue Medication Up to Week 36 | Participants were considered to have used rescue treatment at the time of discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death. Participants were censored at the time of discontinuation from the study due to other reasons. Restricted mean event time and corresponding standard error (SE) are based on the Kaplan-Meier method. The restricted mean event time was calculated up to study day 253 (i.e., week 36). | | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | Days | | Up to Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Duration of Complete Remission While Not Requiring OCS Up to Week 36 | Complete remission was defined as absence of new lesions and epithelialization of old lesions. Participants were considered as not achieving complete remission after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing assessment of complete remission caused by discontinuation from the study before week 36 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered as not achieving complete remission. Participants with missing assessment of complete remission due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation. | | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Days | | Up to Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent of Participants Who Did Not Achieve Control of Disease Activity Before Week 36 | Control of disease activity was defined as absence of new lesions and existing lesions beginning to heal. Participants who achieved initial control of disease activity after rescue treatment use were considered to not have achieved control of disease activity before week 36. Participants whose response status could not be determined due to missing data were considered to not have achieved control of disease activity before week 36. | | Posted | | Number | | Percentage of Participants | | Up to Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent of Participants Who Relapsed After Achieving Control of Disease Activity Up to Week 36 | Relapse was defined as the appearance of 3 or more new lesions a month (blisters, eczematous lesions, or urticarial plaques) or at least 1 large (>10 centimeters [cm] diameter) eczematous lesion or urticarial plaque that does not heal within 1 week. Control of disease activity was defined as absence of new lesions and existing lesions beginning to heal. Participants who used rescue treatment were considered to have relapsed after achieving control of disease activity. Participants whose response status could not be determined due to missing data were considered to have relapsed after achieving control of disease activity. | Participants who achieved control of disease activity were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | | Number | | Percentage of Participants | | Up to Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent of Participants Who Did Not Achieve Complete Remission Before Week 36 | Complete remission was defined as absence of new lesions and epithelialization of old lesions. Participants who achieved initial complete remission after rescue treatment use were considered to not have achieved complete remission before week 36. Participants whose response status could not be determined due to missing data were considered to not have achieved complete remission before week 36. | | Posted | | Number | | Percentage of Participants | | Up to Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥50% From Baseline to Week 36 | BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 36 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score. | | Posted | | Number | | Estimated Percentage of Participants | | Baseline, Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥75% From Baseline to Week 36 | BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 36 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score. | | Posted | | Number | | Estimated Percentage of Participants | | Baseline, Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥90% From Baseline to Week 36 | BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 36 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score. | | Posted | | Number | | Estimated Percentage of Participants | | Baseline, Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Change in Autoimmune Bullous Disease Quality of Life (ABQOL) Score From Baseline to Week 36 | ABQOL questionnaire consists of 17 items, which encompass physical burden of the disease, psychiatric effects, and effects on daily life functioning. Each question ranges from 0 to 3 points, with higher scores indicating poorer quality of life. The maximum ABQOL score is 51. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation. | All participants with available baseline data were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | | Baseline, Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Change in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) of BP Involvement From Baseline to Week 36 | Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation. | | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percent BSA | | Baseline, Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Change in BP180 Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Autoantibody Titer From Baseline to Week 36 | Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation. | All participants with available baseline data were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units per milliliter (U/mL) | | Baseline, Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Change in BP230 IgG Autoantibody Titer From Baseline to Week 36 | Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation. | All participants with available baseline data were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | U/mL | | Baseline, Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission at Week 52 | Sustained remission at week 52, defined as: (1) Complete remission (absence of new lesions & epithelialization of old lesions) & off OCS no later than week 16 & (2) Absence of disease relapse (appearance of ≥3 new lesions a month [blisters, eczematous lesions, or urticarial plaques] or at least 1 large eczematous lesion or urticarial plaque that does not heal within 1 week) after completion of OCS taper, no later than week 16, to week 52 & (3) Absence of need for rescue therapy during 52 weeks (rescue therapy includes increase of OCS dose during the taper, re-initiation of OCS after completion of the OCS taper, or initiation of any BP-directed therapy). Participants with missing sustained remission data at week 52 due to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders & those with missing data due to other reasons were handled using multiple imputation. | | Posted | | Number | | Estimated Percentage of Participants | | At Week 52 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Total Cumulative Dose of OCS From Baseline to Week 52 | All participants in both treatment groups were started on OCS at randomization (day 1) with taper beginning no later than week 6 with the objective to taper off by week 16. OCS could be used as rescue treatment for loss of disease control/ disease relapse during the study. Days after non-OCS systemic rescue treatment use were imputed by the WOCF method (i.e., the highest daily OCS dose prior to any non-OCS systemic rescue treatment use). Missing data after study discontinuation were imputed with the average daily OCS dose among week 52 completers in each treatment group. | | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | mg | | Week 52 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Duration of Complete Remission While Not Requiring OCS Up to Week 52 | Complete remission was defined as absence of new lesions and epithelialization of old lesions. Participants were considered as not achieving complete remission after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing assessment of complete remission caused by discontinuation from the study before week 52 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered as not achieving complete remission. Participants with missing assessment of complete remission due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation. | | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Days | | Up to Week 52 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent of Participants Who Did Not Achieve Control of Disease Activity Before Week 52 | Control of disease activity was defined as absence of new lesions and existing lesions beginning to heal. Participants who achieved initial control of disease activity after rescue treatment use were considered to not have achieved control of disease activity before week 52. Participants whose response status could not be determined due to missing data were considered to not have achieved control of disease activity before week 52. | | Posted | | Number | | Percentage of Participants | | Up to Week 52 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent of Participants Who Relapsed After Achieving Control of Disease Activity Up to Week 52 | Relapse was defined as the appearance of 3 or more new lesions a month (blisters, eczematous lesions, or urticarial plaques) or at least 1 large (>10 cm diameter) eczematous lesion or urticarial plaque that does not heal within 1 week. Control of disease activity was defined as absence of new lesions and existing lesions beginning to heal. Participants who used rescue treatment were considered to have relapsed after achieving control of disease activity. Participants whose response status could not be determined due to missing data were considered to have relapsed after achieving control of disease activity. | Participants who achieved control of disease activity were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | | Number | | Percentage of Participants | | Up to Week 52 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent of Participants Who Did Not Achieve Complete Remission Before Week 52 | Complete remission was defined as absence of new lesions and epithelialization of old lesions. Participants who achieved initial complete remission after rescue treatment use were considered to not have achieved complete remission before week 52. Participants whose response status could not be determined due to missing data were considered to not have achieved complete remission before week 52. | | Posted | | Number | | Percentage of Participants | | Up to Week 52 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent Change in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS From Baseline to Week 52 | Peak pruritus NRS was used by participants to rate the intensity of pruritus during the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch possible. Participants were required to have a baseline peak pruritus NRS maximum intensity average of ≥4 during the 7 days prior to randomization for eligibility. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 52. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation. | All participants with available baseline data were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percentage of Change | | Baseline, Week 52 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) of Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS ≥4 From Baseline to Week 52 | Peak pruritus NRS was used by participants to rate the intensity of pruritus during the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch possible. Participants were required to have a baseline peak pruritus NRS maximum intensity average of ≥4 during the 7 days prior to randomization for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 52 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS. | All participants with available baseline data were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | | Number | | Estimated Percentage of Participants | | Baseline, Week 52 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent Change in BPDAI Activity Score From Baseline to Week 52 | BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 52. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation. | | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percentage of Change | | Baseline, Week 52 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥50% From Baseline to Week 52 | BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 52 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score. | | Posted | | Number | | Estimated Percentage of Participants | | Baseline, Week 52 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥75% From Baseline to Week 52 | BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 52 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score. | | Posted | | Number | | Estimated Percentage of Participants | | Baseline, Week 52 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥90% From Baseline to Week 52 | BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 52 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score. | | Posted | | Number | | Estimated Percentage of Participants | | Baseline, Week 52 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Change in ABQOL Score From Baseline to Week 52 | ABQOL questionnaire consists of 17 items, which encompass physical burden of the disease, psychiatric effects, and effects on daily life functioning. Each question ranges from 0 to 3 points, with higher scores indicating poorer quality of life. The maximum ABQOL score is 51. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 52. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation. | All participants with available baseline data were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | | Baseline, Week 52 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Change in Percent BSA of BP Involvement From Baseline to Week 52 | Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 52. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation. | | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percent BSA | | Baseline, Week 52 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Change in BP180 IgG Autoantibody Titer From Baseline to Week 52 | Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 52. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation. | All participants with available baseline data were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | U/mL | | Baseline, Week 52 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Change in BP230 IgG Autoantibody Titer From Baseline to Week 52 | Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 52. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation. | All participants with available baseline data were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | U/mL | | Baseline, Week 52 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent of Participants in Complete Remission and Off OCS No Later Than Week 16 | Complete remission was defined as absence of new lesions and epithelialization of old lesions. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing assessment of complete remission caused by discontinuation from the study before week 16 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Participants with missing assessment of complete remission before week 16 due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation. | | Posted | | Number | | Estimated Percentage of Participants | | Up to Week 16 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent Change in BPDAI Activity Score From Baseline to Week 16 | BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation. | | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percentage of Change | | Baseline, Week 16 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥50% From Baseline to Week 16 | BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 16 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score. | | Posted | | Number | | Estimated Percentage of Participants | | Baseline, Week 16 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥75% From Baseline to Week 16 | BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 16 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score. | | Posted | | Number | | Estimated Percentage of Participants | | Baseline, Week 16 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥90% From Baseline to Week 16 | BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 16 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score. | | Posted | | Number | | Estimated Percentage of Participants | | Baseline, Week 16 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent Change in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS From Baseline to Week 16 | Peak pruritus NRS was used by participants to rate the intensity of pruritus during the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch possible. Participants were required to have a baseline peak pruritus NRS maximum intensity average of ≥4 during the 7 days prior to randomization for eligibility. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation. | All participants with available baseline data were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percentage of Change | | Baseline, Week 16 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Percent of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) of Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS ≥4 From Baseline to Week 16 | Peak pruritus NRS was used by participants to rate the intensity of pruritus during the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch possible. Participants were required to have a baseline peak pruritus NRS maximum intensity average of ≥4 during the 7 days prior to randomization for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 16 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS. | All participants with available baseline data were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | | Number | | Estimated Percentage of Participants | | Baseline, Week 16 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With At Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Through Week 52 | | | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | Through Week 52 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With At Least One Serious TEAE Through Week 52 | | | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | Through Week 52 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With At Least One TE Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI) Through Week 52 | | | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | Through Week 52 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With At Least One TEAE Through Week 64 | | Participants who entered the follow-up period were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | Week 52 through Week 64 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With At Least One Serious TEAE Through Week 64 | | Participants who entered the follow-up period were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | Week 52 through Week 64 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With At Least One TE AESI Through Week 64 | | Participants who entered the follow-up period were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | Week 52 through Week 64 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Secondary | Concentrations of Functional Dupilumab in Serum | | Number Analyzed=Number of participants contributing to the statistical results at each timepoint. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | milligrams per liter (mg/L) | | Baseline to Week 64 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| | |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With TE Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Response Per Maximum Titer Category | | All participants who received any study drug (active or placebo) and had at least 1 non-missing ADA result following the first dose of study drug or placebo were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | Baseline to Week 64 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Other Pre-specified | Supplemental Analysis of Total Cumulative Dose of OCS From Baseline to Week 36 | All participants in both treatment groups were started on OCS at randomization (day 1) with taper beginning no later than week 6 with the objective to taper off by week 16. OCS could be used as rescue treatment for loss of disease control/ disease relapse during the study. Days after non-OCS systemic rescue treatment use were imputed by the WOCF method (i.e., the highest daily OCS dose prior to any non-OCS systemic rescue treatment use). Missing data after study discontinuation were imputed with the average daily OCS dose among week 36 completers in each treatment group. Median total cumulative dose of OCS from baseline to week 36 reported. | | Posted | | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | mg | | Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |
| Post-Hoc | Post-Hoc Analysis of the Primary Endpoint as Per Health Authority: Percent of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission at Week 36 | Sustained remission at week 36, defined as: (1) Complete remission (absence of new lesions & epithelialization of old lesions) & off oral corticosteroids (OCS) no later than week 16 & (2) Absence of disease relapse (appearance of ≥3 new lesions a month [blisters, eczematous lesions, or urticarial plaques] or at least 1 large eczematous lesion or urticarial plaque that does not heal within 1 week) after completion of OCS taper, no later than week 16, to week 36 & (3) Absence of need for rescue therapy during 36 weeks (rescue therapy includes increase of OCS dose during the taper, re-initiation of OCS after completion of the OCS taper, or initiation of any BP-directed therapy). Participants with missing sustained remission data at week 36 due to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders & those with missing data due to other reasons were handled using multiple imputation. | | Posted | | Number | | Estimated Percentage of Participants | | At Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W | | OG001 | Dupilumab Q2W | Participants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W |
| |