Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of ultrasound treatment in addition to an exercise program to improve pain and function in individuals with plantar fasciitis.
Plantar fasciitis (PF) is a common cause of foot pain, affecting an estimated 2 million people per year.1 Although there are large numbers of people seeking medical attention for this condition, there remains some confusion among health care providers as to the most efficacious treatment and some authors conclude that no data solidly supports effectiveness of treatment.2 Few randomized control studies have been published with respect to treatment of PF with ultrasound. Only one study of this nature was published in 1995 by Crawford et al.3 This research found the true ultrasound was no more effective then sham ultrasound and the authors concluded that future studies need to clarify ultrasound parameters with respect to intensity, duty cycle, frequency, area, duration, dosage, and treatment size.
The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of ultrasound treatment in addition to an exercise program to improve pain and function in individuals with plantar fasciitis. The investigator's primary hypothesis is individuals with PF will show a greater improvement in pain and function with ultrasound and an exercise program as compared to just an exercise program alone.
Research Questions for each outcome measure:
1. Following the four week intervention period, the experimental or the True Ultrasound group (TUG) group will show a greater improvement in their pain rating during two different time intervals: Pain in the previous 24 hours and with initial steps in the morning, as well as three different functional activities: Pain during single limb stance, 30 minutes of standing during ADLs, and walking 1000meter (.62miles) according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) compared to the control group.
2 Following the four week intervention period, the experimental group, TUG, will show an improved percentage of level of function in ADLs and sports as measured by the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) as compared to the control group.
3 Following the four week intervention period the experimental group, TUG, will demonstrate an improved range of motion (ROM) of ankle dorsiflexion in subtalar neutral as measured by a goniometer as compared to the control group.
4 Following a four week intervention period the experimental group, TUG, will demonstrate an increase in ankle strength of the Anterior Tibialis, Posterior Tibialis, Peroneus Longus, Peroneus Brevis, and Gastrocnemius as measured by a hand held dynamometer as compared to the control group.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound and exercise | Experimental | This group will receive ultrasound treatment, strengthening exercises and stretching exercises. |
|
| Sham Ultrasound and exercise | Active Comparator | This group will receive sham ultrasound treatment, strengthening exercises and stretching exercises. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound and exercise | Other | The control group's ultrasound will be set at an intensity of 0 w/cm2. The first 3 treatments to the experimental group will be continuous ultrasound with an intensity of 1.0w/cm2 for 7 minutes. The next 6 treatments for the experimental group (2 times a week for 3 weeks) will have pulsed ultrasound at an intensity of 1.0w/cm2 with a 50% (1:1) duty cycle for 10 minutes. All will have a frequency of 3 MHZ. All participants in each group will be given specific exercises targeting intrinsic and extrinsic muscles of the foot and ankle. Exercises will be performed with a level of thera-band that is challenging to the individual participant in each plane of motion without increased pain for 3 sets of 10 repetitions each and one time each day independently at home during the duration of the treatment protocol (4 weeks) and recorded in an exercise log diary Specific stretches for the plantar fascia and Achilles tendon will be performed 3 times each for 30 second intervals and at home |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Analog scale for pain | The Visual Analog Scale will be used to measure pain at the initial evaluation and at the conclusion of the study for the following intervals: 1) over the previous 24 hour period, 2) with the initial steps first thing in the morning, 3) in single limb stance, 4) after standing for 30 minutes in the course of the participants normal standing activities, and 5) after walking for 1000 meters. This scale has a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 10. Higher scores mean worst outcomes. | Change measures (baseline and up to 5 weeks) |
| Function | The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure is a functional outcome measure validated in the physical therapy setting.7 It will be used to measure differences in ability in activities of daily living and sports at the initial evaluation and at the conclusion of the study. The final score is reported in % (100% being the maximum value). Higher scores reflect better outcomes. | Change measures (baseline and up to 5 weeks) |
| Strength | Strength will be measured with a hand held dynamometer for the tibialis anterior, tibialis posterior, peroneus longus and brevis, and gastrocnemius. | Change measures (baseline and up to 5 weeks) |
| Range of Motion | Dorsiflexion active range of motion (AROM) and dorsiflexion passive range of motion (PROM) measurements will be collected at the initial evaluation and at the conclusion of the treatment protocol. Dorsiflexion AROM and PROM will be measured in prone with the forefoot aligned in the frontal plane, the subtalar joint in neutral, the goniometer measuring the sagittal plane with the proximal arm aligned with the fibular head and the distal arm aligned along the lateral border of the 5th metatarsal by the principal investigator. | Change measures (baseline and up to 5 weeks) |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019220 | High-Energy Shock Waves |
| D015444 | Exercise |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069453 | Ultrasonic Waves |
| D013016 | Sound |
| D011840 | Radiation, Nonionizing |
| D011827 | Radiation |
Not provided
Not provided
Two groups: Control vs. experimental
Not provided
Not provided
An independent investigator will set the parameters with the machine outside the treatment area and not in sight of the principal investigator or participant. The face of the machine will then be covered so neither the principal investigator nor the participant can see the settings.The principal investigator and the participants will not be aware of their group assignments until conclusion of the study.
|
| D055585 |
| Physical Phenomena |
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| D009068 | Movement |
| D009142 | Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena |
| D055687 | Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena |