Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Medtronic | INDUSTRY |
| Globus Medical Inc | INDUSTRY |
| SI-BONE, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Evaluate surgical treatment outcomes and identify best practice guidelines for complex adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients, including radiographic and clinical outcomes, surgical and postoperative complications, risk factors for and revision surgery rates, and the role of standard work to improve patient outcomes and reduce surgical and postoperative complications.
Specific Aims:
• Evaluate surgical treatment outcomes and identify best practice guidelines for complex adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients, including radiographic and clinical outcomes, surgical and postoperative complications, risk factors for and revision surgery rates, and the role of standard work to improve patient outcomes and reduce surgical and postoperative complications.
a. Complex ASD patients will be defined based upon clinical, radiographic and/or procedural criteria identified in an analysis of the existing ISSG ASD database: i. Magnitude of coronal and/or sagittal spinal deformity ≥75th percentile of patients in the ISSG database.
ii. Clinical or Radiographic parameters that corresponded to patients in the ISSG database that had complications requiring revision spine surgery and/or patients that had hospital length of stay >9 days.
iii. Procedures involving 3 column osteotomies and/or anterior column reconstruction (ACR) of the spine
Develop and validate a standardized, universal complications classification system for spine surgery
Evaluate perioperative blood management approaches, transfusion requirements, including variance in thresholds for blood transfusion and associated complications for adult spinal deformity surgery
Assess impact of opioid use and pain management on patient cost, complications and outcomes
Evaluate optimal opioid and analgesic usage and protocols for standard work development
Evaluate clinical outcomes utilizing legacy patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) including modified Oswestry Disability Index (mODI), Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire 22r (SRS-22r), Veterans RAND-12 (VR-12), and numeric pain rating scale (NRS) and compare the results of these legacy PROMs to outcomes scores as measured by the NIH Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - PROMIS Anxiety, Depression, Pain Interference, Physical Function, and Social Satisfaction. Secondary aims for PROM research for this study include
Evaluate clinical outcomes stratifying by patient chronological and physiological age
Evaluate measures to quantify patient physiological age including patient frailty for ASD and validate a frailty measurement system for ASD
Evaluate the role of functional tests in patient's baseline frailty assessment including hand manometer and Edmonton Frail Scale. See appendix, pages 17 & 18 for details.
Evaluate the contribution of patient frailty to patient outcomes, cost of care, disability, and complications
Evaluate if patient frailty is a static measure or if frailty is a dynamic measure that can be improved through "pre-habilitation" and if the according associations with reductions in frailty correlate with reductions of cost, complications, and improvement in outcomes
Evaluate cost variance for ASD surgery according to patient, institution, and geographical region and evaluate the cost effectiveness of surgical intervention for ASD
Evaluate incidence of and risk factors for mental health (MH) compromise among ASD patients and establish best practice guidelines for assessing MH for ASD patients
Evaluate the association of MH with surgical complications, outcomes, hospital length of stay and cost for ASD surgery
Evaluate the association of social health surgical complications, outcomes, hospital length of stay and cost for ASD surgery and risk factors for routine (home) discharge vs. skilled nursing facility (SNF)/rehabilitation facility
Broaden the evaluation of the surgically treated ASD patient to maximize evaluation of the entirety of the episode of care to include steps that can be taken prior to surgery including "prehabilitation," pain management, and MH care to improve treatment outcomes, reduce cost, reduce hospital length of stay, reduce non-routing discharge and reduce early and late complications
Establish a core set of standard work guidelines to clinically and radiographically evaluate and treat ASD patients and evaluate the utility of standard work to improve outcomes for ASD and formulate best practice guidelines for surgical treatment of ASD
Develop predictive analytic algorithms to risk stratify for best/worst outcomes, complications, sentinel events, and economic loss for ASD surgery
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operative | A. Multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized analysis of operatively treated complex ASD patients meeting the following Inclusion Criteria
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index or spine revision surgery for complex adult spinal deformity | Procedure | Surgical interventions will be patient specified by treating surgeon. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 22r | Scoliosis specific patient reported outcome | Change from Preop to 3 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up |
| Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) | Spine specific patient reported outcome | Change from Preop to 3 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up |
| Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) | Patient reported outcome | Change from Preop to 3 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up |
| Radiographic Evaluation | Cobb angles, Coronal & Sagittal balance, spinopelvic measures | Change from Preop to 3 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up |
| Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Anxiety | Computer adaptive PROs | Change from Preop to 3 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up |
| Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Depression | Computer adaptive PRO | Change from Preop to 3 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up |
| Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Pain Interference | Computer adaptive PRO | Change from Preop to 3 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Edmonton Frail Scale | Evaluate frailty on scale of 0 to 17 where higher scores mean more frail | Change from Preop to 3months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up |
| Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA) |
Not provided
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of adult congenital, degenerative, idiopathic or iatrogenic spinal deformity
Full body EOS radiographic assessment (sagittal and coronal visualization from skull to foot)
Complex patients are defined as and meeting any one of the subsequent criteria:
Radiographic criteria:
Procedural criteria:
Geriatric criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Multi-center, prospective, non-randomized analysis of surgically treated complex adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christine Baldus, MS | Contact | 618-444-4130 | baldusc@wustl.edu | |
| Ray Pinteric | Contact | ray.pinteric@outlook.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Shay Bess, MD | Principal Investigator | |
| Lawrence Lenke, MD | Columbia University, Department of Orthopedic Surgery | Principal Investigator |
| Christopher Shaffrey, MD |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shiley Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education at Scripps Clinic | Recruiting | La Jolla | California | 92037 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41761562 | Derived | Boutros M, Assi A, Diebo BG, Prince G, Karam M, Daher M, Ames CP, Bess S, Daniels AH, Gupta MC, Hostin R, Kim HJ, Klineberg EO, Lenke LG, Nunley PD, Passias PG, Schwab FJ, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Lafage R, Lafage V; International Spine Study Group. A New Normative Zone for Acetabular Anteversion Positioning in ASD Patients. J Orthop Res. 2026 Mar;44(3):e70171. doi: 10.1002/jor.70171. | |
| 39576989 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Physical Function |
Computer adaptive PRO |
| Change from Preop to 3 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up |
| Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Social Role Satisfaction | Computer adaptive PRO | Change from Preop to 3 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up |
| Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Social Satisfaction (DSA) | Computer adaptive PRO | Change from Preop to 3 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up |
| Visual Analog Scale - Back Pain | Self-reported back pain on scale of 0 (No pain) to 10 (severe pain) | Change from Preop to 3 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up |
| Visual Analog Scale - Leg Pain | Self-reported leg pain on scale of 0 (No pain) to 10 (severe pain) | Change from Preop to 3 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up |
Frailty scale of 1 to 8; higher scores mean more frail
| Change from Preop to 3months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up |
| Adverse Events | Occurrence of Adverse events meeting reporting criteria and their relationship to intervention throughout the study | 3 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year post treatment |
| Duke University, Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Surgery |
| Principal Investigator |
| University of California, Davis, Department of Orthopedic Surgery | Active, not recruiting | Sacramento | California | 05616 | United States |
| UCSF, Department of Neurosurgery | Recruiting | San Francisco | California | 94143 | United States |
|
| Denver International Spine Center, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children and Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center | Recruiting | Denver | Colorado | 80218 | United States |
|
| University of Kansas, Department of Orthopedic Surgery | Recruiting | Kansas City | Kansas | 66160 | United States |
|
| Norton Leatherman Spine Center | Recruiting | Louisville | Kentucky | 40207 | United States |
|
| Spine Institute of Louisiana | Recruiting | Shreveport | Louisiana | 71101 | United States |
|
| John Hopkins University, Department of Orthopedic Surgery | Recruiting | Baltimore | Maryland | 21224 | United States |
|
| NYU, Department of Orthopedics | Recruiting | New York | New York | 10016 | United States |
|
| Hospital for Special Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery | Recruiting | New York | New York | 10021 | United States |
|
| Columbia University Medical Center | Recruiting | New York | New York | 10032 | United States |
|
| Northwell Health | Recruiting | New York | New York | 10075 | United States |
|
| Duke University Health System | Recruiting | Durham | North Carolina | 27710 | United States |
|
| University Orthopedics | Recruiting | Providence | Rhode Island | 02905 | United States |
|
| Medical City Spine Hospital - Southwest Scoliosis Institute | Recruiting | Dallas | Texas | 75243 | United States |
|
| University of Texas - Houston | Recruiting | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
|
| University of Virginia | Recruiting | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22908 | United States |
|
| Toronto Western | Recruiting | Toronto | Ontario | Canada |
|
| Derived |
| Passias PG, Tretiakov P, Onafowokan OO, Das A, Lafage R, Smith JS, Line BG, Nayak P, Diebo B, Daniels AH, Gum JL, Hamilton DK, Buell TJ, Soroceanu A, Scheer JK, Eastlack RK, Mullin JP, Schoenfeld AJ, Mundis GM, Hosogane N, Yagi M, Mummaneni PV, Chou D, Fu KM, Than KD, Anand N, Okonkwo DO, Wang MY, Klineberg E, Kebaish KM, Lewis S, Hostin R, Gupta M, Lenke L, Kim HJ, Ames CP, Shaffrey CI, Bess S, Schwab F, Lafage V, Burton D. When is staging complex adult spinal deformity advantageous? Identifying subsets of patients who benefit from staged interventions. J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 Nov 22;42(2):185-192. doi: 10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24365. Print 2025 Feb 1. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012600 | Scoliosis |
| D007738 | Kyphosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013121 | Spinal Curvatures |
| D013122 | Spinal Diseases |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided