Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study compares the peri-implant soft tissue and crestal bone loss around single implants when placed macrosurgically and microsurgically.
Black triangles in dentition especially in the anterior teeth would pose an esthetic concern. Interdental papilla height is crucial for eliminating this black triangle.
32 participants, 16 in two groups were assigned randomly. Microsurgical approach using microsurgical instruments and magnifying loupes were used for one group participants and similar procedure without magnifying loupes and microsurgical instruments was done in the other group.
comparsion of the microsurgical outcome is done by measuring peri implant papilla gain and radiographic crestal bone loss will be done between the groups.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| control group | Active Comparator | conventional macrosurgical implant placement |
|
| test group | Experimental | microsurgical implant placement |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dental implant placement using magnifying loupes and microsurgical instruments | Procedure | microsurgical dental implant placement employin splt finger technique by Misch |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| peri-implant papilla height | mesial and distal peri implant papilla height is measured in millimeter | 1 year |
| marginal gingiva | buccal marginal gingival height is measured | 1 year |
| jemt papilla index | papillary height gained around implant is scored using jemt papilla index 0 = no papilla and no indication of a curvature of the soft tissue adjacent to the implant crown are present;
| 1 year |
| crestal bone loss | radiographic crestal bone level around the implants measured from 1st thread of the implant to the coronal or apical most bone level in millimeters. | 1 year |
| pink esthetic score | scoring assigned to 7 soft tissue criteria by an examiner as 0,1,2,3 and the average of the total score is considered the final score. a maximum score of 14 can be alloted | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| surgical time taken | the time taken right from the incision to the implant placement is watched and recorded. | 1 day |
| visual analogue scale score | aesthetic score by the outcome investigator using VAS score sheet of 10 points. 1 being most painful and 10 being painless |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients desiring implant placement for replacement of missing tooth and willing to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
• Pregnant and lactating females
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Dr.Joann pauline George, MDS | Krishnadevaraya college of dental sciences | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Krishnadevaraya college of dental sciences and hospital | Bangalore | Karnataka | 562157 | India |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| macrosurgical dental implant placement | Procedure | macrosurgical placement of single dental implants |
|
| 1 year |
| probing depth | peri implant probing depth at each follow up was recorded | 1 year |
| plaque index | plaque scores were recorded at each follow up 0.-0.9 good 1.0-1.9-fair 2-3-poor | 1 year |
| gingival index | gingival index scores were recorded at each followup 0.1-1-mild gingivitis 1.1-2- moderate gingivitis 2.1-3 severe gingivitis | 1 year |