Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a multi-center, single arm, evaluator-blind prospective study of up to 55 study subjects who are seeking a procedure to reduce the appearance of wrinkles and rhytides.
This is a multi-center, single arm, evaluator-blind prospective study of up to 55 study subjects who are seeking a procedure to reduce the appearance of wrinkles and rhytides. All study subjects will be treated with the Renuvion Dermal System.
The study population will consist of males and females, 30 years of age or older, requesting a procedure for the purpose of improving facial appearance by reducing facial wrinkles and rhytides. Those subjects who meet eligibility criteria and agree to provide written informed consent will be invited to participate.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Subjects | Experimental | Subjects will be treated with the Renuvion Dermal System. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion Dermal System | Device | The Renuvion® Dermal System consists of an electrosurgical generator unit, a handpiece with detachable standoffs, and a supply of helium gas. Radio Frequency (RF) energy is delivered to the handpiece by the electrosurgical generator unit and used to energize an electrode. When helium gas is passed over the energized electrode, a helium plasma is generated which allows for conduction of the RF energy from the electrode to the subject in the form of a precise helium plasma beam. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Independent Photo Reviewer Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Scale (FWS) | The FWS is a clinically validated assessment tool used to assess skin wrinkle severity and elastosis on a scale from 1 through 9, where the lower the value, the better the outcome. Three Independent Photographic Reviewers were blinded to the study subject's visit (Day 90 follow-up visit) and performed photographic assessments of each subject's wrinkle depth in the treated zones. | 90-day |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Independent Photographic Reviewer Masked Assessment | At least 2 out of 3 blinded Independent Photographic Reviewers (IPRs) correctly identify the 90-day image of a subject from the pair of baseline and 90-day images. | 90-day |
| Investigator Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Scale |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Edward Zimmerman, MD | Aesthetic Revolution Las Vegas | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Lin, MD | Sherman Oaks | California | 91403 | United States | ||
| Contemporary Plastic Surgery |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35170772 | Derived | Holcomb JD, Doolabh V, Lin M, Zimmerman E. High energy, double pass helium plasma dermal resurfacing: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical study. Lasers Surg Med. 2022 Jul;54(5):648-662. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23524. Epub 2022 Feb 16. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Full-face Renuvion Dermal System Treatment | Perioral, Forehead, Nose, and Cheek zones were treated with two (2) passes of the plasma beam at 40% power and 4 liters/minute helium flow utilizing the appropriate standoff with one pass done horizontally and the other pass done perpendicular. The Periorbital zone was treated with one (1) or two (2) passes, based on the investigator's discretion, 20% power and 4 liters/minute helium flow utilizing the appropriate standoff (spacer) with up to 2 passes done horizontally or only in one direction. The Jawline/Mandibular Border was treated with one (1) or two (2) passes, based on the investigator's discretion, at 20% - 40% power and 4 liters/minute helium flow using the appropriate standoff and a treatment pattern in a variable motion to achieve blending. For areas that were treated with a 2nd pass, the eschar was wiped away entirely prior to start of the 2nd pass. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Full-face Renuvion Dermal System Treatment | Perioral, Forehead, Nose, and Cheek zones were treated with two (2) passes of the plasma beam at 40% power and 4 liters/minute helium flow utilizing the appropriate standoff with one pass done horizontally and the other pass done perpendicular. The Periorbital zone was treated with one (1) or two (2) passes, based on the investigator's discretion, 20% power and 4 liters/minute helium flow utilizing the appropriate standoff (spacer) with up to 2 passes done horizontally or only in one direction. The Jawline/Mandibular Border was treated with one (1) or two (2) passes, based on the investigator's discretion, at 20% - 40% power and 4 liters/minute helium flow using the appropriate standoff and a treatment pattern in a variable motion to achieve blending. For areas that were treated with a 2nd pass, the eschar was wiped away entirely prior to start of the 2nd pass. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Independent Photo Reviewer Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Scale (FWS) | The FWS is a clinically validated assessment tool used to assess skin wrinkle severity and elastosis on a scale from 1 through 9, where the lower the value, the better the outcome. Three Independent Photographic Reviewers were blinded to the study subject's visit (Day 90 follow-up visit) and performed photographic assessments of each subject's wrinkle depth in the treated zones. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 90-day |
|
Through 6 month follow-up visit for all enrolled subjects.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Full-face Renuvion Dermal System Treatment | Perioral, Forehead, Nose, and Cheek zones were treated with two (2) passes of the plasma beam at 40% power and 4 liters/minute helium flow utilizing the appropriate standoff with one pass done horizontally and the other pass done perpendicular. The Periorbital zone was treated with one (1) or two (2) passes, based on the investigator's discretion, 20% power and 4 liters/minute helium flow utilizing the appropriate standoff (spacer) with up to 2 passes done horizontally or only in one direction. The Jawline/Mandibular Border was treated with one (1) or two (2) passes, based on the investigator's discretion, at 20% - 40% power and 4 liters/minute helium flow using the appropriate standoff and a treatment pattern in a variable motion to achieve blending. For areas that were treated with a 2nd pass, the eschar was wiped away entirely prior to start of the 2nd pass. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bowel Obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | The subject was admitted to the hospital for bowel obstruction. After Investigator review, this event was identified to be secondary to prior bowel cancer that was not reported by subject at baseline. This is not related to study device or procedure. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erythema/skin inflammation/ focal skin congestion (Expected Treatment Effect) | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Limitations of this study include the lack of an ideal internal control as is typically the case in facial skin resurfacing studies and in single-arm studies, inability to precisely control energy density across study sites and between subjects, inability to ensure uniformity of aftercare measures employed by subjects as well as limited post-treatment follow-up of just 6 months.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kari Larson, MBA, Sr. Director, Clinical Affairs | Apyx Medical | 8012440058 | kari.larson@apyxmedical.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | May 11, 2020 | Mar 15, 2022 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 10, 2019 | Mar 15, 2022 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Magnitude of improvement measured by the mean change in FWS from baseline, 90-day, 180-day visit as determined by Investigators. Scale ranges from 1 (no wrinkles) to 9 (most wrinkles). |
| Baseline, 90-day Change, 180-day Change |
| Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale | Subject rated GAIS: Very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse, very much worse | 90-day |
| Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale | Investigator rated GAIS: Very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse, very much worse | 90-day |
| Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire | 5 questions pertaining to satisfaction with results, would you recommend to a friend, would you have the procedure done again, any changes noticed, and any improvement in quality of life. | 90-day |
| Pain and Discomfort | Evaluation of the change in pain and discomfort after treatment (baseline, within 60 minutes following the procedure) as reported by the subject on a visual analog scale (VAS)experienced in the period up to the 10-day follow-up visit. Any pain or discomfort will be recorded daily by each participant in a diary using an 11-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 is no pain and 10 is most pain. | Baseline to Day 10 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Achievement of Re-Epithelialization | Achievement of re-epithelialization by facial zone and across all facial zones as reported by the investigator. | 10-day, 30-day, 90-day |
| Comfortable in Public | Mean duration until study subject feels comfortable going in public after treatment as reported by the study subject. Willing to go out in public by the 10-day visit. | 10-day |
| Jacksonville |
| Florida |
| 32216 |
| United States |
| Holcomb-Kreithen Plastic Surgery and MedSpa, PLLC | Sarasota | Florida | 34237 | United States |
| Aesthetic Revolution Las Vegas | Las Vegas | Nevada | 89148 | United States |
| years |
|
| Age, Customized | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
|
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | kg/m^2 |
|
| Fitzpatrick Skin Type Scale (FST) | Assessment of subject's skin color was determined prior to study procedure by the investigator using the FST. The scale delineates skin color into categories. Type I: White skin that never tans and always burns easily Type II: White skin that tans slightly and always burns easily Type III: Light brown skin that tans gradually and can burn moderately Type IV: Moderately brown skin that tans well and burns slightly Type V: Dark brown skin that tans profusely and burns rarely Type VI: Black skin with deep pigmentation that never burns | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Scale (FWS) | Assessment of each subject's wrinkles categorized into Class I-III and Scores 1-9. Class I: Fine wrinkles Class II: Fine to moderate depth wrinkles, Moderate number of lines Class III: Fine to deep wrinkles, numerous lines, with or without redundant skin folds. Score 1-3: Mild- fine texture changes with subtly accentuated skin lines. Score 4-6: Moderate- distinct papular elastosis and dyschromia. Score 7-9: Severe- Multipapular and confulent elastosis approaching or consistent with cutis rhomboidalis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Independent Photographic Reviewer Masked Assessment | At least 2 out of 3 blinded Independent Photographic Reviewers (IPRs) correctly identify the 90-day image of a subject from the pair of baseline and 90-day images. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 90-day |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Investigator Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Scale | Magnitude of improvement measured by the mean change in FWS from baseline, 90-day, 180-day visit as determined by Investigators. Scale ranges from 1 (no wrinkles) to 9 (most wrinkles). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, 90-day Change, 180-day Change |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale | Subject rated GAIS: Very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse, very much worse | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 90-day |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale | Investigator rated GAIS: Very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse, very much worse | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 90-day |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire | 5 questions pertaining to satisfaction with results, would you recommend to a friend, would you have the procedure done again, any changes noticed, and any improvement in quality of life. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 90-day |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Pain and Discomfort | Evaluation of the change in pain and discomfort after treatment (baseline, within 60 minutes following the procedure) as reported by the subject on a visual analog scale (VAS)experienced in the period up to the 10-day follow-up visit. Any pain or discomfort will be recorded daily by each participant in a diary using an 11-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 is no pain and 10 is most pain. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline to Day 10 |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Percentage of Subjects With Achievement of Re-Epithelialization | Achievement of re-epithelialization by facial zone and across all facial zones as reported by the investigator. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 10-day, 30-day, 90-day |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Comfortable in Public | Mean duration until study subject feels comfortable going in public after treatment as reported by the study subject. Willing to go out in public by the 10-day visit. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 10-day |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 55 |
| 1 |
| 55 |
| 55 |
| 55 |
|
| Crusting (Expected Treatment Effect) | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Edema/Swelling (Expected Treatment Effect) | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain/Tenderness (Expected Treatment Effect) | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Milia/acne | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pruritus/itching (Expected Treatment Effect) | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypertrophic scarring | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (Expected Treatment Effect) | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Telangiectasias | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Discoloration/hypopigmentation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pinpoint Bleeding (Expected Treatment Effect) | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Prolonged Wound Healing | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Urticaria/rash (Expected Treatment Effect) | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Eye Irritation | Eye disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea during Procedure | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Emesis/Vomiting Post-Procedure | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Drug Reaction During Procedure | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Lower Lid Retraction | Eye disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Bowel Obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Unrelated to device/procedure |
|
| Self-Inflicted Superficial Excoriations | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| No Change |
|
| Worse |
|
| Much Worse |
|
| Very Much Worse |
|
| Worse |
|
| Much Worse |
|
| Very Much Worse |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Which Changes do You See in the Area Treated: None |
|
| Skin Texture Improvement |
|
| Skin Tone Improvement |
|
| Skin Pigmentation Improvement |
|
| Fine Lines and Wrinkles Improvement |
|
| Skin Pore Size Improvement |
|
| Skin Feels Better |
|
| Skin Feels Tighter |
|
| Skin Looks Tighter |
|
| Skin Looks More Radiant |
|
| Skin Appears Brighter |
|
| Skin Seems More Youthful |
|
| Other Changes Noted |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| 6 Day |
|
| 10 Day |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|