Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| N°ID-RCB : 2019-A00275-52 | Other Identifier | ANSM |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Data from case series and large retrospective trials suggest that the early treatment of cardiogenic shock AMI patients with the association of VA-ECMO and IABP may significantly decrease mortality, which is still unacceptably high nowadays (40-50% at 30 days).
An important benefit for the patients randomized to the ECMO arm is expected and the risk-to-benefit ratio is expected to be in favor of the experimental treatment arm.
Scientific background
- Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is used more and more frequently in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and refractory cardiogenic shock despite the absence of high level scientific evidence to recommend the use of temporary circulatory support devices (TCS) in this setting.TCS support may also benefit to cardiogenic shock patients not initially refractory to conventional medical management since their mortality exceeds 40% and most of deaths are due to the development of refractory cardiogenic shock and multiple organ failure.
The ANCHOR trial is therefore designed to test the hypothesis that VA-ECMO support associated with IABP results in improved outcomes in comparison with optimal medical treatment alone in patients with AMI and cardiogenic shock. An ethical rescue option to VA-ECMO will however be provided to control patients with cardiogenic shock refractory to conventional medical treatment since recent data suggested survival up-to 50% with ECMO support in this setting.
Main objective - To determine if early VA-ECMO combined with IABP support and optimal medical treatment would improve the outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock as compared with optimal medical treatment alone.
Scope of the study
- Patients satisfying all of the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria will be classified as 'Eligible'. Consent to research will be obtained from a close relative or surrogate for all eligible patients prior to randomization.
Should such a person be absent, eligible patients will be randomized according to the specifications of emergency consent and the patient will be asked to give his/her consent for the continuation of the trial when his/her condition will allow.
Randomization will be possible in centers with robust experience in the management of AMI and cardiogenic shock but no on-site ECMO capability providing that an ECMO retrieval team from the nearest ECMO center can establish ECMO no later than 2 hours after randomization.
Before randomization, physicians at the non-ECMO center will check that the ECMO team is immediately available and that an ICU/CCU bed is available at the ECMO center. Thereafter, if the patient is randomized to the ECMO arm, the mobile ECMO retrieval team will travel to the center, initiate VA-ECMO and will rapidly transfer the patient on VA-ECMO to the ECMO center.
Description of experimental ECMO + IABP Arm
Description of conventional treatment Arm
Protocolized conventional management of cardiogenic shock
IABP not recommended. No other TCS device (e.g., ECMO, Impella, Thoratec PHP, TandemHeart) permitted
Rescue VA-ECMO only if one of 1 or 2 or 3 applies:
1. Refractory cardiogenic shock defined as
2. Uncontrolled lethal arrhythmia despite K >4.5 mmol/l AND Mg >1.0 mmol/l AND Intubation and mechanical ventilation with deep sedation AND IV Loading of amiodarone AND IV xylocaine
3. Refractory cardiac arrest
Mandatory validation of rescue VA-ECMO by an independent adjudicator.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental ECMO + IABP Arm | Experimental | VA-ECMO will be instituted percutaneously under echo guidance via the femoral route as soon as possible. An IABP will be systematically inserted in the contralateral femoral artery (unless technically not possible). |
|
| Control Conventional Treatment Arm | No Intervention | Standard management of cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction according to the current ESC guidelines. It is not recommended to use IABP support and no other TCS device (e.g., ECMO, Impella, Thoratec PHP, TandemHeart) will be permitted in the control group. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VA-ECMO | Device |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment failure at Day 30 | Death in the ECMO group and death OR rescue ECMO in the control group | At day 30 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mortality at Day 30 | All-cause mortality at day 30 | At day 30 |
| Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events | Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events are defined as death, stroke (any new neurological symptoms in association with signs of ischemia or hemorrhage in a cranial CT or MRI), recurrent myocardial infarction, need for repeat revascularization (PCI and/or CABG), renal replacement therapy, re-hospitalization for heart failure, escalation to permanent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or total artificial heart, cardiac transplant. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Altered mental status OR cold, clammy skin and extremities OR oliguria with urine output <30 ml/h OR serum lactate >2.0 mmol/l
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alain COMBES, MD, PhD | Contact | 01.42.16.38.16 | +33 | alain.combes@aphp.fr |
| Gilles MONTALESCOT, MD, PhD | Contact | 01.42.16.30.07 | +33 | gilles.montalescot@aphp.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alain COMBES, MD, PhD | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière Paris | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière | Recruiting | Paris | 75013 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29083953 | Background | Thiele H, Akin I, Sandri M, Fuernau G, de Waha S, Meyer-Saraei R, Nordbeck P, Geisler T, Landmesser U, Skurk C, Fach A, Lapp H, Piek JJ, Noc M, Goslar T, Felix SB, Maier LS, Stepinska J, Oldroyd K, Serpytis P, Montalescot G, Barthelemy O, Huber K, Windecker S, Savonitto S, Torremante P, Vrints C, Schneider S, Desch S, Zeymer U; CULPRIT-SHOCK Investigators. PCI Strategies in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 21;377(25):2419-2432. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1710261. Epub 2017 Oct 30. | |
| 25173339 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012770 | Shock, Cardiogenic |
| D000072657 | ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction |
| D000072658 | Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009203 | Myocardial Infarction |
| D017202 | Myocardial Ischemia |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
A multicenter, prospective, randomized, comparative open trial will be conducted on two parallel groups of patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| At day 30 |
| Stroke | Any new neurological symptoms in association with signs of ischemia or hemorrhage in a cranial CT or MRI | At day 30 |
| Recurrent myocardial infarction | Recurrent myocardial infarction | At day 30 |
| Need for repeat revascularization with PCI and/or CABG | Need for repeat revascularization (PCI and/or CABG) | At day 30 |
| Need for renal replacement therapy | Need for renal replacement therapy | At day 30 |
| Re-hospitalization for heart failure | re-hospitalization for heart failure | At day 30 |
| Escalation to LVAD or total artificial heart | Escalation to permanent left ventricular assist device or total artificial heart | At day 30 |
| Cardiac transplantation | Cardiac transplantation | At day 30 |
| Major bleeding | Major bleeding (TIMI definition): Any intracranial bleeding (excluding microhemorrhages <10 mm evident only on gradient-echo MRI) OR Clinically overt signs of hemorrhage associated with a drop in hemoglobin of ≥5 g/dL or a ≥15% absolute decrease in hematocrit OR Fatal bleeding (bleeding that directly results in death within 7 d) | At day 30 |
| Red blood cells transfused | Number of packed red blood cells transfused | At day 30 |
| Serum lactate | Time to serum lactate normalization | At day 30 |
| Number of days alive without organ failure at day 30 | Number of days alive without organ failure(s) defined with the SOFA score, catecholamine support, mechanical ventilation and renal replacement therapy | At day 30 |
| Durations of ICU stay and hospitalization | Durations of ICU stay and of hospitalization | At day 30 |
| LV function | LV function assessed with Doppler echocardiography or magnetic resonance imaging | At day 30 |
| NYHA/INTERMACS status | NYHA/INTERMACS status | At day 30 |
| ECMO-related complications | ECMO-related complications (infection at VA-ECMO cannulation sites requiring antibiotics, hemorrhage, limb ischemia requiring surgery, cannula or circuit thrombosis, overt pulmonary edema, thrombocytopenia, gaseous emboli and hemolysis). | At day 30 |
| Treatment failure at one year | Treatment failure defined as death (all-cause) in the ECMO group and death (all-cause) OR rescue ECMO in the control group. | At one year |
| Mortality at one year | All-cause mortality | At one year |
| Major Adverse Cardiovascular at one year | MACE, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events are defined as death, stroke (any new neurological symptoms in association with signs of ischemia or hemorrhage in a cranial CT or MRI), recurrent myocardial infarction, need for repeat revascularization (PCI and/or CABG), renal replacement therapy, re-hospitalization for heart failure, escalation to permanent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or total artificial heart, cardiac transplant. | At one year |
| Stroke at one year | Stroke (any new neurological symptoms in association with signs of ischemia or hemorrhage in a cranial CT or MRI), | At one year |
| Recurrent myocardial infarction at one year | Recurrent myocardial infarction between randomization and one year | At one year |
| PCI and/or CABG at one year | Repeat revascularization (PCI and/or CABG) between randomization and one year | At one year |
| Renal replacement therapy at one year | Need for renal replacement therapy between randomization and one year | At one year |
| Re-hospitalization for heart failure | Re-hospitalization for heart failure between randomization and one year | At one year |
| LVAD at one year | Escalation to permanent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or total artificial heart | At one year |
| Cardiac transplant at one year | Cardiac transplantation | At one year |
| Major bleeding at one year | Major bleeding (TIMI definition): Any intracranial bleeding (excluding microhemorrhages <10 mm evident only on gradient-echo MRI) OR Clinically overt signs of hemorrhage associated with a drop in hemoglobin of ≥5 g/dL or a ≥15% absolute decrease in hematocrit OR Fatal bleeding (bleeding that directly results in death within 7 d) | At one year |
| NYHA/INTERMACS status at one year | NYHA/INTERMACS status | At one year |
| Returned to work at one year | Rate of patients who returned to work if previously active | At one year |
| LV ejection fraction at one year | Latest LV ejection fraction | At one year |
| Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire at one year | Quality of life assessed using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey questionnaire | At one year |
| Background |
| Authors/Task Force members; Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Juni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available. |
| 30145971 | Background | Thiele H, Akin I, Sandri M, de Waha-Thiele S, Meyer-Saraei R, Fuernau G, Eitel I, Nordbeck P, Geisler T, Landmesser U, Skurk C, Fach A, Jobs A, Lapp H, Piek JJ, Noc M, Goslar T, Felix SB, Maier LS, Stepinska J, Oldroyd K, Serpytis P, Montalescot G, Barthelemy O, Huber K, Windecker S, Hunziker L, Savonitto S, Torremante P, Vrints C, Schneider S, Zeymer U, Desch S; CULPRIT-SHOCK Investigators. One-Year Outcomes after PCI Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 1;379(18):1699-1710. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808788. Epub 2018 Aug 25. |
| 29400656 | Background | Overtchouk P, Pascal J, Lebreton G, Hulot JS, Luyt CE, Combes A, Kerneis M, Silvain J, Barthelemy O, Leprince P, Brechot N, Montalescot G, Collet JP. Outcome after revascularisation of acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock on extracorporeal life support. EuroIntervention. 2018 Apr 6;13(18):e2160-e2168. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01014. |
| 26825953 | Background | Muller G, Flecher E, Lebreton G, Luyt CE, Trouillet JL, Brechot N, Schmidt M, Mastroianni C, Chastre J, Leprince P, Anselmi A, Combes A. The ENCOURAGE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after VA-ECMO for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Mar;42(3):370-378. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4223-9. Epub 2016 Jan 29. |
| D014652 |
| Vascular Diseases |
| D007238 | Infarction |
| D007511 | Ischemia |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D009336 | Necrosis |
| D012769 | Shock |