Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To ensure the safety of participants during the COVID-19 pandemic, this clinical trial is suspended until further notice. This study was terminated due to the lockdown requirements.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This will be a prospective, single group, single-arm, and bilateral dispensing study. Subjects will be assigned to a single study lens type to be worn bilaterally in daily wear, and daily disposable modality, for at least 6 hours per day every day for approximately 12 weeks.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| JJVC Marketed Contact Lens | Experimental | Eligible subjects that have no experience with soft multifocal lenses for more than 2 years will be assigned to a single study lens type worn in both eyes daily for at least 6 hours per day, everyday for approximately 12 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acuvue Moist Multifocal Contact Lens JJVC Marketed Contact Lens | Device | JJVC Marketed Contact Lens |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Quest Questionnaire Classification Summary | Subjects are classified into 1 of 4 mutually exclusive groups based on their responses to 6 individual items. 5 items were assessed using the 7-point like-rt scale. A composite score "Life Satisfaction" was calculated for each subject by summing their responses, the final score ranges 0-35 points. Where higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with life. The final item was assessed using a 5 point like-rt scale. If a subject scored 26 or higher for the composite score and responded positively (4 or 5) to the final item, then a subject was classified as "Content & Driven". If a subject scored 26 or higher but did not respond positively, then "Content & Indifferent". If a subject scored lower than 26 and responded positively, then "Discontented & Driven". Lastly, if a subject scored lower than 26 but did not respond positively, then "Discontented & Indifferent". The percentage of subjects for each group was reported. | Baseline |
| Proportion of Successful Lens Wearers | Successful lens wearers were defined as subjects that fit the following criteria: 1.Completed all required study visits, 2. responded Excellent or Very Good to both the individual questionnaire items (Overall quality of vision and Overall Comfort) and 3. the investigator would recommend the study lenses. Overall quality of Vision and Overall Comfort are individual questionnaire items with the response set of 0: Not Applicable, 1: Excellent, 2: Very Good, 3: Good, 4: Fair and 5: Poor. Investigator recommendation was determined by the individual item "In your opinion, is it suitable to prescribe contact lenses for this subject? (Yes/No)". The proportion of successful lens wearers was reported. | 12-Week Follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Monocular Contrast Threshold | Monocular Contrast threshold was measured at Distance (4 meter) for both the left and right eyes using the M&S clinical trial suit (CTS) under standard room illumination. Contrast threshold was collected at Baseline, post lens fitting, 2-week follow-up evaluation and the 12-week evaluation. Contrast threshold at baseline was measured while wearing a spherical-cylinder refraction in a trial frame. The M&S system displayed the contrast threshold score in log units. The average contrast threshold was reported for each timepoint. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Potential Subjects must satisfy all of the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:
The participant must read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form.
Appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.
Is at least 40 years of age (inclusive) at the time of screening and has full legal capacity to volunteer.
Had a self-reported eye examination in the last two years.
The subject must either already be wearing a presbyopic correction (e.g., reading spectacles over contact lenses, or multifocal spectacles, etc.) or respond positively to at least one symptom on the 'Presbyopic Symptoms Questionnaire".
Can achieve best corrected distance monocular visual acuity of at least +0.20 logMAR and binocular visual acuity of at least +0.10 logMAR with refraction.
Have a refractive cylinder of ≤1.00 D in each eye.
Has corrected best sphere equivalent distance refraction in the range -0.50 D of -6.00 D in each eye (vertex corrected if greater than -4.00D).
Have a reading ADD power in the range of +0.75 D to +1.75 D (inclusive) in each eye.
Have a wearable pair of spectacles (at the discretion of the investigator) to wear when they cannot wear the study lenses.
Exclusion Criteria:
Potential Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Clinical Trial | Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre for Ocular Research and Education, University of Waterloo | Waterloo | Ontario | Canada |
Johnson & Johnson Medical Device Companies have an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 29 subjects were enrolled into this study. Of those enrolled, 27 were dispensed study lenses, while 2 subjects failed to meet all eligibility criteria. Of those dispensed, 19 completed the study while 8 subjects were discontinued. This study was terminated early due to COVID-19.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Etafilcon A Multifocal Lens | Subjects that wore the etafilcon A lens during any point of the study. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
All subjects dispensed in a study lens.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Dispensed Subject | All subjects dispensed a study lens. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Quest Questionnaire Classification Summary | Subjects are classified into 1 of 4 mutually exclusive groups based on their responses to 6 individual items. 5 items were assessed using the 7-point like-rt scale. A composite score "Life Satisfaction" was calculated for each subject by summing their responses, the final score ranges 0-35 points. Where higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with life. The final item was assessed using a 5 point like-rt scale. If a subject scored 26 or higher for the composite score and responded positively (4 or 5) to the final item, then a subject was classified as "Content & Driven". If a subject scored 26 or higher but did not respond positively, then "Content & Indifferent". If a subject scored lower than 26 and responded positively, then "Discontented & Driven". Lastly, if a subject scored lower than 26 but did not respond positively, then "Discontented & Indifferent". The percentage of subjects for each group was reported. | All subjects dispensed a study lens. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Baseline |
|
Throughout the entire duration of the study. Approximately 3 months per subject.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Etafilcon A Multifocal Lens | Subjects that wore the etafilcon A lens during any point of the study. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Karkkanien - Sr. Principal Research Optometrist | Johnson & Johnson VIsion Care, Inc. | 1-800-843-2020 | TKarkkai@its.jnj.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 20, 2019 | Jan 18, 2022 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Baseline, Post Lens Fitting, 2-Week Follow-up, 12-Week Follow-up |
| Binocular Contrast Threshold | Binocular Contrast threshold was measured at Distance (4 meter) using the M&S clinical trial suit (CTS) under standard room illumination. Contrast threshold was collected at Baseline, post lens fitting, 2-week follow-up evaluation and the 12-week evaluation. Contrast threshold at baseline was measured while wearing a spherical-cylinder refraction in a trial frame. The M&S system displayed the contrast threshold score in log units. | Baseline, Post Lens Fitting, 2-Week Follow-up, 12-Week Follow-up |
| Photopic Pupillometry | Pupillometry was measured for both the left and right eyes at baseline and the 1-week follow-up evaluation . Pupil size was measured at distance, intermediate and near positions under photopic (500 lux) conditions using the NeurOptic VIP-300 pupilometer. The average pupil size across both eyes was reported for each distance and timepoint. | Baseline, 1-Week Follow-up |
| Scotopic Pupillometry | Pupillometry was measured for both the left and right eyes at baseline and the 1-week follow-up evaluation . Pupil size was measured at distance, intermediate and near positions under scotopic (0 lux) conditions using the NeurOptic VIP-300 pupilometer. The average pupil size across both eyes was reported for each distance and timepoint. | Baseline, 1-Week Follow-up |
| Near Stereopsis Threshold | Near Stereopsis threshold was collected binocularly using a Randot Stereopsis book at near (40cm) at baseline (over bare eyes), and at 10-minutes post lens fitting, 2-Week and 12-week follow-up evaluations over the study contact lenses. The average stereopsis threshold for each timepoint was reported. | Baseline, 10-mintue Post Lens Fitting, 2-Week Follow-up, 12-Week Follow-up |
| Blur Tolerance | Blur tolerance was assessed by subjects being presented with a series on images on a screen. Two aspects of blur were evaluated, noticeable blur and objectionable blur; where, noticeable blur was defined as the threshold in diopters at which point the subject indicated a "just noticeable blur", while objectional blur was defined as the point which the subject indicated the blur of the image to be "absolutely intolerable". Blur tolerance was measured binocularly at 1-meter at baseline only. | Baseline |
| Fixation Disparity With Refraction | Fixation disparity with Refraction was measured at baseline with a Mallet Unit for both distance (4 meter) and near (40 cm). This test measures small misalignments between eyes when the eyes are in a fused state. The average amount of base (prism diopters) was reported. The Amount of base can range from 0.00 to 4.00. | Baseline |
| Non-invasive Tear Break-up Time | Measurement of non-invasive tear break up time (NITBUT) was conducted using a Placido disc topographer in both the left and right eyes on a bare eye at baseline and over the study contact lens 10 minutes post-lens insertion and at the 2-Week follow-up evaluation. Subjects were instructed to blink three times and then hold their eyes open. At the hold time was started, time was stopped once the first area of distortion or break in the tear film was observed. Three replicates were taken on each eye. The average NITBUT across eyes and replicate at each time point was provided. Larger values of NITBUT indicates better tear film. | Baseline, 10-minute Post Lens Fitting, 2-Week Follow-up |
| Coma | Coma was measured over 2 seconds after blink in both the left and right eyes at baseline (over bare eye) and at 10-minutes post-lens fitting, 2-week, and 12-week follow-up evaluations over the study contact lenses using the COAS wavefront sensor. Both vertical and horizontal Coma was collected in each eye. The average vertical and horizontal coma at each timepoint was reported. | Baseline, 10-minute Post Lens Fitting, 2-Week Follow-up, 12-Week Follow-up |
| Higher Order Aberration | Higher Order Aberration (HOA) was measured over 2 seconds after blink in both the left and right eyes at baseline (over bare eye) and at 10-minutes post-lens fitting, 2-week, and 12-week follow-up evaluations over the study contact lenses using the COAS wavefront sensor. The average HOA at each timepoint was reported. | Baseline, 10-minute Post Lens Fitting, 2-Week Follow-up, 12-Week Follow-up |
| Keratometry (Diopters) | Keratometry (corneal curvature) collected at baseline for each eye (left and right) using an autokeratometer. The measurement was recorded in diopters (DK) of major keratometric meridians. The average of each measurement was reported. | Baseline |
| Keratometry (Degrees) | Keratometry (corneal curvature) collected at baseline for each eye (left and right) using an autokeratometer. The measurement was recorded for locations (degrees) of major keratometric meridians. The average of each measurement was reported. | Baseline |
| Objective Accommodation With Distance Refraction | Objective accommodation with sphero-cylindrical distance refraction was collected using the WAM-5500 auto-refractor at distance (4-meter), Intermediate (1-meter) and Near (40cm) in both the left and right eyes at baseline, 10-minutes post lens fitting, 2-week and 12-week follow-up evaluations. Measurements at baseline were collected on bare eyes and over the study contact lens at the follow-up evaluations. The average sphere power (diopters) across eyes was report for each distance and timepoint. | Baseline, 10-minute Post Lens Fitting, 2-Week Follow-up, 12-Week Follow-up |
| Binocular Visual Acuity (logMAR) | Binocular Visual Acuity (logMAR) was collected using logMAR visual acuity chart under standard room illumination at distance (4 meter), intermediate (64cm) and near (40cm) at 10 minutes-post lens fitting, and the 1-, 2-, 6- and 12-week follow-up evaluations. However, intermediate was not collected post fitting and at the 1-week follow-up evaluation. A value of 0.0 logMAR is approximate to 20/20 Snellen Visual Acuity. Lower values of visual acuity (logMAR) indicate better vision. The average visual acuity was reported for each distance and timepoint. | 10-minute Post Lens Fitting, 1-Week Follow-up, 2-Week Follow-up, 6-Week Follow-up, 12-Week Follow-up |
| Monocular Visual Acuity (logMAR) | Monocular Visual Acuity (logMAR) was collected in both the left and right eyes using logMAR visual acuity chart under standard room illumination at distance (4 meter), intermediate (64cm) and near (40cm) at 10 minutes-post lens fitting, and the 1-, 2-, 6- and 12-week follow-up evaluations. However, intermediate was not collected post fitting and at the 1-week follow-up evaluation. A value of 0.0 logMAR is approximate to 20/20 Snellen Visual Acuity. Lower values of visual acuity (logMAR) indicate better vision. The average visual acuity was reported for each distance and timepoint. | 10-minute Post Lens Fitting, 1-Week Follow-up, 2-Week Follow-up, 6-Week Follow-up, 12-Week Follow-up |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG000 |
| Etafilcon A Multifocal Lens |
Subjects that wore the etafilcon A lens during any point of the study. |
|
|
| Primary | Proportion of Successful Lens Wearers | Successful lens wearers were defined as subjects that fit the following criteria: 1.Completed all required study visits, 2. responded Excellent or Very Good to both the individual questionnaire items (Overall quality of vision and Overall Comfort) and 3. the investigator would recommend the study lenses. Overall quality of Vision and Overall Comfort are individual questionnaire items with the response set of 0: Not Applicable, 1: Excellent, 2: Very Good, 3: Good, 4: Fair and 5: Poor. Investigator recommendation was determined by the individual item "In your opinion, is it suitable to prescribe contact lenses for this subject? (Yes/No)". The proportion of successful lens wearers was reported. | All subjects dispensed a study lens. | Posted | Number | Proportion of Participants | 12-Week Follow-up |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Monocular Contrast Threshold | Monocular Contrast threshold was measured at Distance (4 meter) for both the left and right eyes using the M&S clinical trial suit (CTS) under standard room illumination. Contrast threshold was collected at Baseline, post lens fitting, 2-week follow-up evaluation and the 12-week evaluation. Contrast threshold at baseline was measured while wearing a spherical-cylinder refraction in a trial frame. The M&S system displayed the contrast threshold score in log units. The average contrast threshold was reported for each timepoint. | All subjects dispensed a study lens. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | log CS | Baseline, Post Lens Fitting, 2-Week Follow-up, 12-Week Follow-up | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Binocular Contrast Threshold | Binocular Contrast threshold was measured at Distance (4 meter) using the M&S clinical trial suit (CTS) under standard room illumination. Contrast threshold was collected at Baseline, post lens fitting, 2-week follow-up evaluation and the 12-week evaluation. Contrast threshold at baseline was measured while wearing a spherical-cylinder refraction in a trial frame. The M&S system displayed the contrast threshold score in log units. | All subjects dispensed a study lens. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | log CS | Baseline, Post Lens Fitting, 2-Week Follow-up, 12-Week Follow-up |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Photopic Pupillometry | Pupillometry was measured for both the left and right eyes at baseline and the 1-week follow-up evaluation . Pupil size was measured at distance, intermediate and near positions under photopic (500 lux) conditions using the NeurOptic VIP-300 pupilometer. The average pupil size across both eyes was reported for each distance and timepoint. | All subjects dispensed a study lens. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm | Baseline, 1-Week Follow-up |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Scotopic Pupillometry | Pupillometry was measured for both the left and right eyes at baseline and the 1-week follow-up evaluation . Pupil size was measured at distance, intermediate and near positions under scotopic (0 lux) conditions using the NeurOptic VIP-300 pupilometer. The average pupil size across both eyes was reported for each distance and timepoint. | All subjects dispensed a study lens. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm | Baseline, 1-Week Follow-up |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Near Stereopsis Threshold | Near Stereopsis threshold was collected binocularly using a Randot Stereopsis book at near (40cm) at baseline (over bare eyes), and at 10-minutes post lens fitting, 2-Week and 12-week follow-up evaluations over the study contact lenses. The average stereopsis threshold for each timepoint was reported. | All subjects enrolled the study. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | seconds of arc | Baseline, 10-mintue Post Lens Fitting, 2-Week Follow-up, 12-Week Follow-up |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Blur Tolerance | Blur tolerance was assessed by subjects being presented with a series on images on a screen. Two aspects of blur were evaluated, noticeable blur and objectionable blur; where, noticeable blur was defined as the threshold in diopters at which point the subject indicated a "just noticeable blur", while objectional blur was defined as the point which the subject indicated the blur of the image to be "absolutely intolerable". Blur tolerance was measured binocularly at 1-meter at baseline only. | All subjects dispensed a study lens. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | diopters | Baseline |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Fixation Disparity With Refraction | Fixation disparity with Refraction was measured at baseline with a Mallet Unit for both distance (4 meter) and near (40 cm). This test measures small misalignments between eyes when the eyes are in a fused state. The average amount of base (prism diopters) was reported. The Amount of base can range from 0.00 to 4.00. | All subjects dispensed a study lens. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | prism diopters | Baseline |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Non-invasive Tear Break-up Time | Measurement of non-invasive tear break up time (NITBUT) was conducted using a Placido disc topographer in both the left and right eyes on a bare eye at baseline and over the study contact lens 10 minutes post-lens insertion and at the 2-Week follow-up evaluation. Subjects were instructed to blink three times and then hold their eyes open. At the hold time was started, time was stopped once the first area of distortion or break in the tear film was observed. Three replicates were taken on each eye. The average NITBUT across eyes and replicate at each time point was provided. Larger values of NITBUT indicates better tear film. | All subjects dispensed a study lens. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | seconds | Baseline, 10-minute Post Lens Fitting, 2-Week Follow-up | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Coma | Coma was measured over 2 seconds after blink in both the left and right eyes at baseline (over bare eye) and at 10-minutes post-lens fitting, 2-week, and 12-week follow-up evaluations over the study contact lenses using the COAS wavefront sensor. Both vertical and horizontal Coma was collected in each eye. The average vertical and horizontal coma at each timepoint was reported. | All subjects dispensed a study lens. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | microns | Baseline, 10-minute Post Lens Fitting, 2-Week Follow-up, 12-Week Follow-up | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Higher Order Aberration | Higher Order Aberration (HOA) was measured over 2 seconds after blink in both the left and right eyes at baseline (over bare eye) and at 10-minutes post-lens fitting, 2-week, and 12-week follow-up evaluations over the study contact lenses using the COAS wavefront sensor. The average HOA at each timepoint was reported. | All subjects dispensed a study lens. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | microns | Baseline, 10-minute Post Lens Fitting, 2-Week Follow-up, 12-Week Follow-up | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Keratometry (Diopters) | Keratometry (corneal curvature) collected at baseline for each eye (left and right) using an autokeratometer. The measurement was recorded in diopters (DK) of major keratometric meridians. The average of each measurement was reported. | All subjects dispensed a study lens. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | diopters | Baseline | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Keratometry (Degrees) | Keratometry (corneal curvature) collected at baseline for each eye (left and right) using an autokeratometer. The measurement was recorded for locations (degrees) of major keratometric meridians. The average of each measurement was reported. | All subjects dispensed a study lens. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | degrees | Baseline | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Objective Accommodation With Distance Refraction | Objective accommodation with sphero-cylindrical distance refraction was collected using the WAM-5500 auto-refractor at distance (4-meter), Intermediate (1-meter) and Near (40cm) in both the left and right eyes at baseline, 10-minutes post lens fitting, 2-week and 12-week follow-up evaluations. Measurements at baseline were collected on bare eyes and over the study contact lens at the follow-up evaluations. The average sphere power (diopters) across eyes was report for each distance and timepoint. | All subjects dispensed a study lens. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | diopters | Baseline, 10-minute Post Lens Fitting, 2-Week Follow-up, 12-Week Follow-up | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Binocular Visual Acuity (logMAR) | Binocular Visual Acuity (logMAR) was collected using logMAR visual acuity chart under standard room illumination at distance (4 meter), intermediate (64cm) and near (40cm) at 10 minutes-post lens fitting, and the 1-, 2-, 6- and 12-week follow-up evaluations. However, intermediate was not collected post fitting and at the 1-week follow-up evaluation. A value of 0.0 logMAR is approximate to 20/20 Snellen Visual Acuity. Lower values of visual acuity (logMAR) indicate better vision. The average visual acuity was reported for each distance and timepoint. | All subjects dispensed a study lens. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | logMAR | 10-minute Post Lens Fitting, 1-Week Follow-up, 2-Week Follow-up, 6-Week Follow-up, 12-Week Follow-up |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Monocular Visual Acuity (logMAR) | Monocular Visual Acuity (logMAR) was collected in both the left and right eyes using logMAR visual acuity chart under standard room illumination at distance (4 meter), intermediate (64cm) and near (40cm) at 10 minutes-post lens fitting, and the 1-, 2-, 6- and 12-week follow-up evaluations. However, intermediate was not collected post fitting and at the 1-week follow-up evaluation. A value of 0.0 logMAR is approximate to 20/20 Snellen Visual Acuity. Lower values of visual acuity (logMAR) indicate better vision. The average visual acuity was reported for each distance and timepoint. | All subjects dispensed a study lens. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | logMAR | 10-minute Post Lens Fitting, 1-Week Follow-up, 2-Week Follow-up, 6-Week Follow-up, 12-Week Follow-up | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 27 |
| 0 |
| 27 |
| 0 |
| 27 |
Not provided
| Post Lens Fitting |
|
|
| 2-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| 12-Week Follow-up |
|
|
|
| 2-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| 12-Week Follow-up |
|
|
|
| Baseline: Near (40 cm) |
|
|
| 1-Week Follow-up: Distance (4 meter) |
|
|
| 1-Week Follow-up: Intermediate (1 meter) |
|
|
| 1-Week Follow-up: Near (40 cm) |
|
|
|
| Baseline: Near (40 cm) |
|
|
| 1-Week Follow-up: Distance (4 meter) |
|
|
| 1-Week Follow-up: Intermediate (1 meter) |
|
|
| 1-Week Follow-up: Near (40 cm) |
|
|
|
| 2-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| 12-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| 10 minutes Post-Lens Insertion |
|
|
| 2-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Horizontal: 10 minutes Post-Lens Insertion |
|
|
| Horizontal: 2-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Horizontal: 12-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Vertical: Baseline |
|
|
| Vertical: 10 minutes Post-Lens Insertion |
|
|
| Vertical: 2-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Vertical: 12-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| 10 minutes Post-Lens Insertion |
|
|
| 2-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| 12-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Distance: 10-Minutes Post Lens Fitting |
|
|
| Distance: 2-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Distance: 12-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Intermediate: Baseline |
|
|
| Intermediate: 10-Minutes Post Lens Fitting |
|
|
| Intermediate: 2-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Intermediate: 12-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Near: Baseline |
|
|
| Near: 10-Minutes Post Lens Fitting |
|
|
| Near: 2-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Near: 12-Week Follow-up |
|
|
|
| Distance: 2-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Distance: 6-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Distance: 12-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Near: 10-Minutes Post Lens Fitting |
|
|
| Near: 1-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Near: 2-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Near: 6-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Near: 12-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Intermediate: 2-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Intermediate: 6-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Intermediate: 12-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Distance: 1-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Distance: 2-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Distance: 6-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Distance: 12-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Near: 10-Minutes Post Lens Fitting |
|
|
| Near: 1-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Near: 2-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Near: 6-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Near: 12-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Intermediate: 2-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Intermediate: 6-Week Follow-up |
|
|
| Intermediate: 12-Week Follow-up |
|
|