Mid-urethral Sling Procedure includes retropubic as well as transobturator full length slings. "Mini-sling" and "single-incision" sling will not be allowed due to potential risk for higher failure rate.

The Urogenital Distress Inventory is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The UDI Irritative subscale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater distress. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of combined mixed stress/urge and non-categorized incontinence epsiodes. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of episodes at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of episodes at baseline.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of all incontinence epsiodes. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of episodes at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of episodes at baseline.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of diurnal voids. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of voids at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of voids at baseline.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of nocturnal voids. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of voids at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of voids at baseline.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of all voids. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of voids at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of voids at baseline.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months, for participants with >8 voids at baseline, the outcome is calculated as Yes=no more than 8 voids noted at the time point, No=Otherwise

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months, the outcome is calculated as Yes=at least 50% reduction in the number of voids between the timepoint and baseline, No=Otherwise

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months, the outcome is calculated as Yes=greater than baseline number of voids at the time point or with greater than 8 voids at the time point, No=Otherwise

EQ-5D is a standardized instrument developed by the EuroQol Group as a measure of health-related quality of life. The visual analog scale (VAS) score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

EQ-5D is a standardized instrument developed by the EuroQol Group as a measure of health-related quality of life. The index score ranges from 0 to 1 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Physical Activity score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Travel score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Social Relationship score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Emotional Health score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Total score ranges from 0 to 400 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Symptom Severity score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating worse quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Coping score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Concern score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Sleep score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Social score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF HRQL score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The OAB-SATq Satisfaction score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction.

The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The OAB-SATq Side Effect score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating fewer side effects.

The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The OAB-SATq Endorsement score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater endorsement.

The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The OAB-SATq Convenience score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater convenience.

The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The preference score is a binary [yes/no] indicator as to whether a subject indicated slight or definite preference for the treatment among women that have had previous treatment for overactive bladder. The outcome is the percentage of participants that prefer the current treatment to previous treatments.

The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a patient-reported measure of perceived improvement with treatment, as assessed on a scale of 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Included here are participants who had improvement as indicated by a rating of 1 (very much better), 2 (much better).

The Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) is a patient-reported measure of perceived severity of condition, as assessed on a scale of 1 (Normal) to 4 (Severe). Included here are participants who reported Normal or Mild severity as indicated by a rating of 1 or 2.

Patient GLobal Impression of Symptom Control(PGSC) is a patient-reported measure of perceived adequate symptom control, as assessed on a scale of 1 (disagree strongly) to 5 (agree strongly). Included here are participants who had adequate control as indicated by a rating of 5 (agree strongly) or 4 (agree).

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Not Sexually Active-Partner Related (NSA-PR) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Not Sexually Active-Condition Specific (NSA-CS) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Not Sexually Active-Global Quality Rating (NSA-GQA) ranges from 1 to 4.5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Not Sexually Active-Condition Impact (NSA-CI) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Arousal Orgasm (SA-AO) ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Partner Related (SA-PR) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Condition Specific (SA-CS) ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Global Quality Rating (SA-GQR) ranges from 1 to 4.75 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Condition Impact (SA-CI) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Desire (SA-D) ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Average (SA-AVG) ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for physical function domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for physical role limitations domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for bodily pain domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for general health domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for vitality domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for social functioning domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for emotional role limitation domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for social functioning domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The physical composite score is a normalized t-score which combines the all 8 domains with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (higher scores indicate greater physical function). A t-score below 50 is a good all-around cutoff for detecting physical condition (per the Ware manual). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 2 weeks and 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The mental composite score is a normalized t-score which combines the all 8 domains with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (higher scores indicate greater mental health). A t-score below 52 is a well-documented cutoff for detecting depression (per the Ware manual). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Postvoid Residual Volume

Total of all reporting groups

The Urogenital Distress Inventory is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The UDI Stress subscale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater distress. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Urogenital Distress Inventory is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The UDI Irritative subscale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater distress. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Urogenital Distress Inventory is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The UDI Obstructive subscale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater distress. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of combined mixed stress/urge and non-categorized incontinence epsiodes. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of episodes at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of episodes at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of all incontinence epsiodes. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of episodes at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of episodes at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of diurnal voids. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of voids at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of voids at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of nocturnal voids. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of voids at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of voids at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of all voids. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of voids at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of voids at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months, for participants with >8 voids at baseline, the outcome is calculated as Yes=no more than 8 voids noted at the time point, No=Otherwise

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months, the outcome is calculated as Yes=at least 50% reduction in the number of voids between the timepoint and baseline, No=Otherwise

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months, the outcome is calculated as Yes=greater than baseline number of voids at the time point or with greater than 8 voids at the time point, No=Otherwise

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

EQ-5D is a standardized instrument developed by the EuroQol Group as a measure of health-related quality of life. The visual analog scale (VAS) score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

EQ-5D is a standardized instrument developed by the EuroQol Group as a measure of health-related quality of life. The index score ranges from 0 to 1 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Physical Activity score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Travel score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Social Relationship score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Emotional Health score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Total score ranges from 0 to 400 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Symptom Severity score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating worse quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Coping score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Concern score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Sleep score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Social score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF HRQL score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The OAB-SATq Satisfaction score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The OAB-SATq Side Effect score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating fewer side effects.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The OAB-SATq Endorsement score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater endorsement.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The OAB-SATq Convenience score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater convenience.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The preference score is a binary [yes/no] indicator as to whether a subject indicated slight or definite preference for the treatment among women that have had previous treatment for overactive bladder. The outcome is the percentage of participants that prefer the current treatment to previous treatments.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a patient-reported measure of perceived improvement with treatment, as assessed on a scale of 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Included here are participants who had improvement as indicated by a rating of 1 (very much better), 2 (much better).

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) is a patient-reported measure of perceived severity of condition, as assessed on a scale of 1 (Normal) to 4 (Severe). Included here are participants who reported Normal or Mild severity as indicated by a rating of 1 or 2.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

Patient GLobal Impression of Symptom Control(PGSC) is a patient-reported measure of perceived adequate symptom control, as assessed on a scale of 1 (disagree strongly) to 5 (agree strongly). Included here are participants who had adequate control as indicated by a rating of 5 (agree strongly) or 4 (agree).

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Not Sexually Active-Partner Related (NSA-PR) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Not Sexually Active-Condition Specific (NSA-CS) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Not Sexually Active-Global Quality Rating (NSA-GQA) ranges from 1 to 4.5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Not Sexually Active-Condition Impact (NSA-CI) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.