Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R01AG075014 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Florida | OTHER |
| University of Minnesota | OTHER |
| National Institute on Aging (NIA) | NIH |
| Clemson University |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Older adults at risk for dementia show a variety of cognitive deficits, which can be ameliorated by different cognitive training (CT) exercises. The best combination of CT exercises is unknown. The aim is to discover the most efficacious combination of CT exercises as compared to cognitive stimulation (which will serve as a stringent, active control) to modify the functional trajectories of older adults' with MCI, who are at high risk for dementia. The primary objective of the U01 phase was to design and pilot-test an adaptive, randomized clinical trial (RCT) of cognitive training (CT) combinations aimed to enhance performance of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) among persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In the R01 phase, the objective is to identify the best combination of CT exercises to delay dementia onset among persons with MCI. The longitudinal endpoint goal is reducing incident dementia. The primary aim of the study is to determine which CT combination has the best probability to delay dementia by producing the largest IADL improvements. The study further aims to explore neuroimaging and novel blood-based biomarkers.
An Adaptive Clinical Trial of Cognitive Training to Improve Function and Delay Dementia: The ACTIVE MIND Trial.
In the U01 phase, the primary objective was to design and pilot-test an adaptive, randomized clinical trial (RCT) of cognitive training (CT) combinations aimed to enhance performance of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) among persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The longitudinal endpoint goal is delaying dementia onset.
The secondary objectives of the U01 phase were:
- To pilot test a plan to recruit and enroll under-represented minorities with the goal of obtaining a sample representative of the USF population in race and ethnicity.
In the current R01 phase:
The primary objective is to conduct an adaptive, randomized clinical trial (RCT) of cognitive training (CT) combinations aimed to enhance performance of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) among persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The longitudinal endpoint goal is reducing dementia incidence.
Design: The design is an adaptive randomized trial to identify the best combination of CT exercises to improve IADL function and thereby delay dementia onset among persons with MCI. Four arms of CT will be compared to an active control condition.
Outcomes: incident dementia is the primary outcome. Secondary outcome is Everyday Function: measures include Timed Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and iFunction. A composite of performance (measured by time and accuracy) will be derived.
Interventions and Duration: Four combinations of computerized cognitive training and an active control computerized stimulation will be investigated. The five arms will be equivalent in terms of frequency and duration of each session (60 min/day, two-three days/wk, 16 weeks).
Sample size: The study team plans to enroll up to 1305 participants. Individuals with a clinical diagnosis of MCI will be included in the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| CTa | Experimental | Participants will complete computerized cognitive training. The duration is 60 min/day; the frequency is two to three days/wk, for 16 weeks with the goal of completing 40 sessions. |
|
| CTab | Experimental | Participants will complete computerized cognitive training. The duration is 60 min/day; the frequency is two to three days/wk, for 16 weeks with the goal of completing 40 sessions. |
|
| CTac | Experimental | Participants will complete computerized cognitive training. The duration is 60 min/day; the frequency is two to three days/wk, for 16 weeks with the goal of completing 40 sessions. |
|
| CTabc | Experimental | Participants will complete computerized cognitive training. The duration is 60 min/day; the frequency is two to three days/wk, for 16 weeks with the goal of completing 40 sessions. |
|
| Computerized Cognitive Stimulation | Active Comparator | Participants will complete cognitively-stimulating computer activities. The duration is 60 min/day; the frequency is two to three days/wk, for 16 weeks with the goal of completing 40 sessions. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Training | Behavioral | Participants will be completing a total of 40 computerized sessions. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Dementia incidence | Clinical diagnosis of dementia | At follow-up visit between 6 months to 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Useful Field of View Test performance overall score | Useful Field of View test (UFOV) score across three subtests measured in milliseconds (ms). Lower scores are better. | change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| Graduated continuous performance test score |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| blood based biomarker Neurofilament light (Nfl) | Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts. | change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| blood based biomarker Total tau |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerri Edwards, PhD | Contact | 864-916-6220 | activemindcoordinator@gmail.com | |
| Jade Sutfin | Contact | 864-916-6220 | activemindcoordinator@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jerri Edwards, PhD | University of Alabama at Birmingham | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of California San Francisco | Recruiting | San Francisco | California | 94158 | United States |
Not provided
| OTHER |
| University of California, San Francisco | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Computerized Cognitive Stimulation | Behavioral | Participants will be completing a total of 40 computerized cognitive stimulation sessions. |
|
The metrics of performance are target accuracy (in percent correct) and the variability of responses (standard deviation of response times to target images). Higher scores are better. |
| change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| Examiner Executive Function Set shifting, Anti-Saccades, and Flanker performance composite score | The proprietary software calculates an overall executive function composite score using item response theory. Higher scores are better | change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| Timed IADL performance score | A composite z score is calculated that reflects the overall time and accuracy of performance on the Timed IADL subtests per standard, published procedures (SPSS syntax of scoring method can be provided). Lower scores are better. | change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| ifunction performance efficiency index | An overall score reflecting time and accuracy (i.e., efficiency index) is calculated to reflect performance across the ifunction subtests the proprietary software determines the score. Higher scores are better for efficiency index | change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrast |
| change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| blood based biomarker hydroxsphingomyelins SM (OH) C22:1, SM (OH) C22:2, SM (OH) C24:1 | Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts. | change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| blood based biomarker brain derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) | Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts. | change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| blood based biomarker insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1), IGF binding protein-1 (IGFBP1) and IGFBP-2 | Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts. | change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| blood based vascular biomarkers of asymmetric dimethylarginine [ADMA]; aspartic avid; acetyl-L-cartinine [C2]; butenyl-L-cartinine [C4:1] | Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts. | change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| Neuroimaging MRI whole brain and regional volume | Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts. | change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| Neuroimaging MRI surface area cortical thickness metrics from T1 weighted images | Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts. | change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| Neuroimaging MRI whole brain and regional white matter hyper-intensity volume from FLAIR | Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts. | change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| Neuroimaging MRI hippocampal subfield volume from high resolution hippocampal images | Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts. | change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| Neuroimaging MRI regional and white matter metrics of fractional anisotropy from diffusion weighted imaging | Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts. | change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| Neuroimaging MRI regional and white matter metrics of median diffusivity from diffusion weighted imaging | Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts. | change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| Neuroimaging MRI regional and white matter metrics of radial diffusivity from diffusion weighted imaging | Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts. | change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| Neuroimaging MRI regional and whole brain measures of cerebral perfusion from arterial spin labeling | Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts. | change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| Neuroimaging MRI regional and whole brain cerebral microbleed volume from T2*GRE images | Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts. | change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| Neuroimaging regional and network measures of functional connectivity for resting state fMRI | Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts. | change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| Virtual Reality Functional Assessment Tool performance | Measures may include Virtual Reality Functional Assessment Tool (VRFCAT) Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts. | change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months |
| University of Florida | Recruiting | Gainesville | Florida | 32611 | United States |
|
| Active Mind Study | Recruiting | Tampa | Florida | 33617 | United States |
|
| University of Minnesota | Active, not recruiting | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55455 | United States |
| Clemson University | Recruiting | Greenville | South Carolina | 29607 | United States |
|
| Clemson University | Recruiting | Seneca | South Carolina | 29672 | United States |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D060825 | Cognitive Dysfunction |
| D003704 | Dementia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003072 | Cognition Disorders |
| D019965 | Neurocognitive Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000091942 | Cognitive Training |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000066530 | Neurological Rehabilitation |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
| D000359 | Aftercare |
| D003266 | Continuity of Patient Care |
| D005791 | Patient Care |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D006296 | Health Services |
| D005159 | Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services |
Not provided
Not provided