Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Biolase Inc | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A comparison of laser (REPaiR) compared with minimally invasive surgical therapy for moderate to severe periodontal disease.
The Trial is a multi-center, randomized, blinded, parallel arm trial of REPaiR therapy (experimental treatment) versus MIST (control therapy) in a maximum of 2 qualifying periodontal study teeth will be treated in each subject. Qualifying teeth will have PPD ≥ 6mm and intrabony vertical ≥ 3 mm, with base of defect ≥ 3 mm coronal to the tooth apex, and defect angle ≥ 25°.
For Subjects already in maintenance therapy and having completed scaling and root planing within the previous 6-months, up to 3 Study Teeth will be selected and SRP conducted on just these teeth, and subjects will be randomized to either Test or Control Therapies (Visit 3). For patients already in maintenance therapy and NOT having completed SRP within the previous 6-months, up to 3 qualifying teeth may be selected, and localized SRP in the study teeth quadrants (Visit 2) can be followed after 4-6 weeks by Visit 3 Therapy on up to 2 Study Teeth. Other subjects not in maintenance therapy and with up to 3 qualifying teeth will be selected at the Screening Visit; then 4-6 weeks following SRP, up to 2 Study Teeth will be selected, and subjects will be randomized to either Test or Control Therapies. Follow-up assessments will be conducted on all subjects by a blinded examiner over a 12-month period.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIST - minimally invasive surgical therapy | Active Comparator | Beginning with the "papilla preservation technique" (Takei et al), further improved by Cortellini et al (1995) and combined with minimally invasive approaches (Harrel et al 1995), MIST, using "minimally invasive surgical approaches and micro-surgery instruments," has evolved into a decision tree guideline for treating periodontitis based on periodontal pocket morphology and papilla width/ interdental space (Cortellini P, Tonetti MS (2007) J Clin Periodontol;34(1):87-93). |
|
| REPaiR - laser periodontal therapy | Experimental | The REPaiR regimen is a step-by-step protocol for using the Waterlase Express Er,Cr:YSGG laser for periodontitis. The protocol steps and associated laser delivery is controlled by a computer interface that dictates laser tip, energy and associated air and water mixes. Like MIST, REPaiR uses a set, decision tree approach for periodontal therapy, with prescribed steps and laser settings to quantify and standardize treatment. Potential clinical benefit, as with MIST, are not only effective periodontal therapy with reduced recession compared with traditional surgical approaches, but also reduced patient morbidity (Arnabat-DomÃnguez et al (2010). Lasers Med Sci;25(3):459-64). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIST (minimally invasive surgical therapy) | Device | REPaiR Periodontal Therapy |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| CAL (Clinical Attachment Level) | Clinical Attachment Level Measured by Periodontal Probe using PPD and Recession | 6-months post Sx |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Radiographic evidence of bone fill | Standardized periapical radiographs | 6-months post Sx |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Reported Outcome for Pain | Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) for Pain Using 10-Point scale 0-"no pain at all" to 10-"pain as bad as you can imagine" VAS. A low score would indicate a low level of patient reported post-operative pain. | Daily for 7-days following Sx |
| Patient Reported Outcome for Satisfaction |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Use within 30 days prior to Day 1, or a condition for which use is anticipated during trial: topical oral, nasal and systemic corticosteroids.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Donald Clem, DDS | Regenerative Solutions | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medelis Inc | Nashville | Tennessee | 37215 | United States |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010510 | Periodontal Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
randomized, blinded, parallel arm trial, non-inferiority comparison of REPaiR therapy (experimental treatment) versus MIST (control therapy)
Not provided
Not provided
Examiners are blinded
|
Satisfaction with Esthetics and Overall Satisfaction with Procedure Using the following list of response options: Very satisfied (Scored as 1), Somewhat satisfied (Scored as 2), Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (Scored as 3), Somewhat dissatisfied (Scored as 4), Very dissatisfied (Scored as 5) A low score would indicate a high level of satisfaction with the treatment provided. |
| 1-month, 3-months and 6-months post SX |