Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Stanford University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The use of Mifepristone, an antiprogesterone, and Misoprostol together, has been shown to make the medial abortion process more efficient and reduce the induction-to-abortion interval by almost 50%. Despite the recommended 24-48 Mifepristone-Misoprostol interval, recent retrospective study of a flexible interval, have revealed shorter total abortion time with shorter intervals. In this study we aim to compare 24 to 12 hours Mifepristone to Misoprostol intervals
Women are looking for termination of pregnancies in the second trimester, after 12 weeks of gestation for social and medical reasons, as well as due to intrauterine fetal demise. Both surgical and medical methods can be used, depending on the patients' preference, providers skills, availability of drugs and instruments and more. Methods of medical abortion can be performed with the use of prostaglandin analogues, mifepristone, oxytocin, foley catheter and osmotic dilators. Misoprostol, a prostaglandin analogue (PGE1), is currently recommended over other agents due to its efficacy, low cost and ease of use. Misoprostol can be used alone or in combination with other agents. The use of Mifepristone, an antiprogesterone, and Misoprostol together, has been shown to make the medial abortion process more efficient and reduce the induction-to-abortion interval by almost 50%. Current guidelines recommend the use of Mifepristone 200 mg orally, followed by Misoprostol 400 mcg every 3-4, hours 24-48 later until expulsion of the fetus. Despite the recommended 24-48 Mifepristone-Misoprostol interval, recent retrospective study of a flexible interval, ≤12, 12-24 and >24 hours, have revealed shorter total abortion time (time from Mifepristone to fetal expulsion) with the shorter intervals. Thus, strict adherence to current guidelines may unnecessarily prolong the abortion procedure.
Objective Prompted by the need to explore more beneficial methods and regimes for second trimester medical abortion, we aim to compare 24 to 12 hours Mifepristone to Misoprostol intervals
Material and Methods Women eligible for second trimester medical abortion will be approached to enroll in the study at the clinic or emergency room when they arrive to schedule medical abortion. A research staff member will obtain informed consent. The patient will undergo a blood test including blood type, complete blood count and chemistry. Basic demographic information will be collected. A complete history and physical assessment will be performed. If an ultrasound report is not available to confirm gestational age dating, ultrasound will be performed to determine gestational age. A baseline cervical exam will be done at this visit to assess cervical consistency. Patients will be randomized into one of two groups according to a computer-generated random allocation sequence. Sequentially numbered sealed opaque envelopes will be used to provide allocation.
Patients will be discharged home after receiving Mifepristone, and hospitalized upon arrival for the Misoprostol administration.
If the abortion is not complete after five doses, the woman may be allowed to rest for 12 hours before starting the cycle again.
All participants will be contacted by phone as well as a chart review conducted to assess for delayed complications. During this follow up time, they will be asked to notify the research team if they should develop fatigue, malaise, abdominal pain, or jaundice. If these symptoms occur, a workup for liver injury would be performed. Patients will be asked to obtain repeat liver function tests within two weeks post-procedure to compare to their baseline hepatic panel.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 hours interval | Active Comparator | Mifepristone followed by Misoprostol treatment |
|
| 24 hours interval | Active Comparator | Mifepristone followed by Misoprostol treatment |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 hours interval | Other | Time interval between treatments |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Induction-abortion time | Total induction to complete abortion ( estimated by hours) | Through completion of abortion, an estimated period of up to 3 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fever | Fever measure above 38 degrees | From the beginning until completion of abortion,estimated up to two weeks |
| Excessive blood loss | Excessive blood loss estimated by the medical team ( remnants of blood on pad, active bleeding estimated to be equal to menstruation, heavier bleeding including blood clots, blood loss leading to hemodynamically instability including tachycardia and/or reduced blood pressure) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Inability to give informed consent
Allergy to any of the drugs used in the study
Genital bleeding of unknown etiology; cancer of the breast, cervix, uterus, or ovaries; hepatic disease (current or history of)
Multiple gestation
Rupture of membranes
Taken a CYP3A4 inhibitor within 5 elimination half-lives of the drug from the procedure
Pre-dosing abnormal liver function tests
Patients at increased risk of hepatitis based on a history of any of the following:
Female
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Aya A Mohr-Sasson, M.D | Sheba Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheba Medical Center | Ramat Gan | 56506 | Israel |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18254113 | Result | Lohr PA, Hayes JL, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD006714. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006714.pub2. | |
| 23812485 | Result | ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 135: Second-trimester abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;121(6):1394-1406. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000431056.79334.cc. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 24 hours interval |
| Other |
Time interval between treatments |
|
| From the beginning until completion of abortion, estimated up to two weeks |
| Any emergency department visit | Emergency department visit during the abortion or reported on follow up | From the beginning until completion of abortion, estimated up to two weeks |
| 21664506 | Result | Borgatta L, Kapp N; Society of Family Planning. Clinical guidelines. Labor induction abortion in the second trimester. Contraception. 2011 Jul;84(1):4-18. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Mar 30. |
| 29861084 | Result | Costescu D, Guilbert E. No. 360-Induced Abortion: Surgical Abortion and Second Trimester Medical Methods. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Jun;40(6):750-783. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.12.010. |
| 30664367 | Result | Li HWR, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Mechanisms of action of emergency contraception pills. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019 Feb;24(1):11-12. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2018.1555663. Epub 2019 Jan 21. No abstract available. |
| 22296076 | Result | Donnez J, Tomaszewski J, Vazquez F, Bouchard P, Lemieszczuk B, Baro F, Nouri K, Selvaggi L, Sodowski K, Bestel E, Terrill P, Osterloh I, Loumaye E; PEARL II Study Group. Ulipristal acetate versus leuprolide acetate for uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 2;366(5):421-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103180. |
| 14667994 | Result | Blithe DL, Nieman LK, Blye RP, Stratton P, Passaro M. Development of the selective progesterone receptor modulator CDB-2914 for clinical indications. Steroids. 2003 Nov;68(10-13):1013-7. doi: 10.1016/s0039-128x(03)00118-1. |
| 38781593 | Derived | Meyer R, Toussia-Cohen S, Shats M, Segal O, Mohr-Sasson A, Peretz-Bookstein S, Amitai-Komem D, Sindel O, Levin G, Mashiach R, Blumenthal PD. 24-Hour Compared With 12-Hour Mifepristone-Misoprostol Interval for Second-Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jul 1;144(1):60-67. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005535. Epub 2024 May 23. |