Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Chronic neck pain is a common disorder for spine specialists. Radiofrequency ablation of medial branches has been proven effective in selected patients for relieving pain. A newer radiofrequency ablation cannula has been developed (multi-tined), allowing perpendicular access. It is proposed as an alternative to the more technically challenging traditional approach. This study aims to compared the technical and clinical aspects of both techniques.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional cannula | Active Comparator | Cervical Medial Branch Radiofrequency Neurotomy using a conventional cannula, the patient lying prone with a posterior approach. |
|
| Multi-tined cannula | Experimental | Cervical Medial Branch Radiofrequency Neurotomy using a Multi-Tined cannula, the patient lying in lateral decubitus with a lateral approach |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radiofrequency ablation of cervical medial branches | Device | Radiofrequency ablation of cervical medial branches |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Numerical Pain Rating scale for patient's pain during the procedure | pain during radiofrequency procedure will be compared between the 2 groups as a principal hypothesis is that the new multi-tined cannula is better tolerated by patients Scale is from 0-10, 0/10 is no pain which is better than pain of 10/10 | 1 day of the intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fluoroscopy time | Calculated time of fluoroscopy in seconds | 1 day of the intervention |
| Radiation dosage | Calculated dose of radiation measure by the C-arm |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre Hospitalier Université de Montréal | Montreal | Quebec | Canada |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
randomized controlled trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 1 day of the intervention |
| time of procedure | Total time of procedure in minutes/seconds | 1 day of the intervention |
| Patient pain (Numerical Rating Scale - NRS score) | therapeutic effect on pain Scale is from 0-10, 0/10 is no pain which is better than pain of 10/10 | 0, 3, 6 12 months |
| Patient function (Neck disability Index - NDI) | therapeutic effect on function scale is from 0-100%, where 0% is better than 100% in terms of the effect of pain on function | 0, 3, 6, 12 months |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019547 | Neck Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided