Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Non-Incised Papilla Surgical Approach Versus Modified Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique in Treatment of Intra-osseous Defects in Patients With Stage III Periodontitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Non-Incised Papilla Surgical Approach Versus Modified Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique in Treatment of Intra-osseous Defects in Patients With Stage III Periodontitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
The aim: Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation for intra-osseous defects in stage III periodontitis using NIPSA versus M-MIST Steps in short Pre-surgical therapy
• Before surgical intervention, each patient will be given careful instructions on proper oral hygiene measures.
Surgical Procedures:
P: Population: Stage III periodontitis presenting intraosseous defects I: Intervention: Non-Incised Papilla Surgical Approach (NIPSA) C: Control: Modified Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique (M-MIST) O: Outcome measurements T: 1- year S: Randomized clinical trial
Surgical Procedures:
The operator will anesthetize the surgical sites with 4% ARTINIBSA containing Articaine hydrochloride Epinephrine (adrenaline) 1: 100.000 injection for both groups. For patients that recieved (NIPSA) as reported by (Moreno Rodríguez and Caffesse 2017).
while patients that received (M-MIST) reported by (Banthia et al. 2016a)
Patients will be recalled monthly for supportive periodontal therapy during the course of the study. And then will be recalled every six months for supportive periodontal therapy after the study.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: