Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-001530-33 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Lingual microcystic lymphatic malformations (LMLMs) are rare congenital vascular malformations, presenting as clusters of cysts filled with lymph fluid or blood. They are responsible for a heavy burden even with small well-limited lesions because of oozing, bleeding, infections, or even speech, chewing or breathing impairment. Pain and aesthetic prejudice are also frequently reported. The natural history of LMLMs is progressive worsening. LMLMs complex management requires multidisciplinary care in specialised centres, and the "wait-and-see" approach is frequently used. In complicated lymphatic malformations, whatever the location, treatment with oral sirolimus, an mTOR (mammalian Target of Rapamycin) inhibitor, is often used.
Topical sirolimus is a known effective treatment for some cutaneous conditions such as angiofibromas in tuberous sclerosis. Topical applications of sirolimus on the buccal mucosae have been reported in erosive lichen planus and oral pemphigus vulgaris with good tolerance and none to slight detectable blood sirolimus concentrations.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a 1mg/mL sirolimus solution applied once daily on mild to moderate lingual microcystic lymphatic malformation in children and adults after 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks of treatment as compared to usual care (no treatment).
This is a randomized, open-labelled, multicenter pilot study using an individually randomized stepped wedge design over a 24 weeks period to evaluate topical application of 1 mg/mL sirolimus solution, 0.5 mL to 1 mL according to the size of the lesion, once daily, on lingual microcystic lymphatic malformation that do not require systemic treatment, the experimental intervention versus usual care (no treatment), the control condition.
In this design, subjects are included in a cohort where at a randomized time (W0, W4, W8 or W12), they switch from an observational period to the interventional period.
All subjects will be followed for 24 weeks
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sirolimus 1mg/mL | Experimental | Application of 1 mg/mL sirolimus solution, 0.5 mL to 1 mL according to the size of the lesion, once daily, on lingual microcystic lymphatic malformation, the experimental intervention versus usual care (no treatment), the control condition. |
|
| Control condition | No Intervention | Usual care, i.e. no intervention |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sirolimus Oral Liquid Product 1mg/mL | Drug | 0.5 mL to 1 mL according to the size of the lesion, once daily, on lingual microcystic lymphatic malformation |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Physical Global Assessment (PGA) after topical application of Sirolimus for 12 weeks | The primary outcome will consist in the evaluation of global severity of the LMLM using PGA (Physical Global Assessment) 0 to 5 score, by three independent blinded experts, on monthly standardized photographs. A 1-point improvement versus baseline in PGA scale would already have a clinical relevance. Our primary analysis will focus on change in PGA after topical application of Sirolimus for 12 weeks | 12 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Investigator-assessed PGA | Investigator-assessed PGA (Physical Global Assessment) | at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 |
| Assessment by the patient regarding severity of oozing, bleeding, sialorrhea, eating impairment, taste modification, aesthetic impairment, pain and global discomfort, |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Annabel MARUANI, MD-PhD | University Hospital of TOURS;INSERM 1246 SPHERE | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univsersity of TOURS _ Service de Dermatologie | Tours | Indre et Loire | 37044 | France | ||
| Hospital NECKER -AP-HP - Dermatology |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35804404 | Derived | Marchand A, Caille A, Gissot V, Giraudeau B, Lengelle C, Bourgoin H, Largeau B, Leducq S, Maruani A. Topical sirolimus solution for lingual microcystic lymphatic malformations in children and adults (TOPGUN): study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, assessor-blinded, controlled, stepped-wedge clinical trial. Trials. 2022 Jul 8;23(1):557. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06365-y. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Individually randomized stepped wedge
Not provided
Not provided
Primary outcome is assessed on anonymised photographs by an adjudication committee blinded from treatment allocation
|
Assessment by the patient regarding severity of oozing, bleeding, sialorrhea, eating impairment, taste modification, aesthetic impairment, pain and global discomfort, each using a numeric scale from 0 to 10 (0: clear, 10: very severe), at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 |
| at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. |
| Global evolution assessed by the patient | Global evolution assessed by the patient from -10 to 10 (-10 = severe worsening, 0 = no change, 10 = complete recovery), at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. | at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. |
| Global Quality of life assessment | (DLQI or children's DLQI for minors aged 5 to 16), at baseline, time of switch to treatment and week 24. | at baseline, at time of switch to the intervention (either week 0, week 4, week 8 or week 12) and week 24. |
| Measurements of the lesion | by the investigator, at baseline, time of switch to treatment and week 24. | at baseline, at time of switch to the intervention (either week 0, week 4, week 8 or week 12) and week 24. |
| Time to obtain optimal results | i.e. time from switch to treatment to time reaching the minimal PGA score | up to 24 weeks |
| Assessment of tolerance of topical sirolimus: | record of local side effects at each visit after the patient has crossed over to the intervention, up to 24 weeks | from the switch to intervention up to the end of the study, i.e a maximum of 24 weeks. |
| General side effects | Follow-up of general side effects | rom the switch to intervention up to the end of the study, i.e a maximum of 24 weeks. |
| Assessment of sirolimus blood passage | by measuring residual sirolimus blood concentration: after 4 weeks of treatment, then 8 weeks, then every 8 weeks until week 24 | after 4 weeks of treatment, then 8 weeks, then every 8 weeks until week 24 |
| Evaluation of biological safety | Number of participants with at least one biological abnormality treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0 | after 8,16 and up to 24 weeks |
| Paris |
| 75015 |
| France |