Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The use of implants for conventional anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft fixation has been associated with several problems including graft injury, implant osteolysis, implant migration and soft tissue irritation. Implantless ACL surgery offers additional benefits involving lower cost, improved graft incorporation and ease of revision surgery. The investigators aimed to compare the functional outcome of implantless bone-patellar tendon autograft using press-fit fixation technique and hamstring autografts using implant.
Purpose: The use of implants for conventional anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft fixation has been associated with several problems including graft injury, implant osteolysis, implant migration and soft tissue irritation. Implantless ACL surgery offers additional benefits involving lower cost, improved graft incorporation and ease of revision surgery. The investigators aimed to compare the functional outcome of implantless bone-patellar tendon autograft using press-fit fixation technique and hamstring autografts using implant.
Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study design was used. Between March 2013 and March 2014, 12 patients underwent implantless ACL reconstruction using press-fit femoral technique, while 24 patients underwent implant ACL reconstruction. Objective functional outcome were measured using rolimeter, and subjective functional outcome were measured according to IKDC, Tegner-Lysholm and KOOS.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| implantless Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction | Experimental | implantless Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using press-fit femoral technique |
|
| Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with implant | Experimental | ACL reconstruction with implant (hamstring autograft fixed with bioscrew and endo-button) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patella tendon & bone block autograft + press-fit femoral technique | Procedure | Implantless Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using press-fit femoral technique The investigator's study uses the press-fit graft fixation technique by Edgar Michael. A midline skin incision was made that extends from inferior pole of patella up to anterior tibial tuberosity. Patella tendon with tibial tuberosity bone block were harvested, patella bone was left intact. The tendon was fixed together with non-absorbable suture. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Anterior knee laxity | Anterior knee laxity (in centimetres) was assessed by measuring anterior translation at 30° of flexion with a rolimeter and comparing it with the contralateral knee. | At 1 month after surgery. |
| Anterior knee laxity | Anterior knee laxity (in centimetres) was assessed by measuring anterior translation at 30° of flexion with a rolimeter and comparing it with the contralateral knee. | At 3 months after surgery. |
| Anterior knee laxity | Anterior knee laxity (in centimetres) was assessed by measuring anterior translation at 30° of flexion with a rolimeter and comparing it with the contralateral knee. | At 6 months after surgery. |
| Functional outcome score International Knee Documentation committee (IKDC) | International Knee Documentation committee (IKDC) score evaluate improvement or deterioration in symptoms, function, and sports activities. Number of items: 18 subscales:
Response options vary for each item. Item 6 dichotomizes response into yes/no; items 1, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 use 5-point Likert scales; and items 2, 3, and 10 use 11-point numerical rating scales. The total score is calculated as (sum of items)/(maximum possible score) × 100. Possible score range 0-100, where 100 = no limitation with daily or sporting activities and the absence of symptoms. Higher values represent a better outcome. | At 1 month after surgery. |
| Functional outcome score International Knee Documentation committee (IKDC) | International Knee Documentation committee (IKDC) score evaluate improvement or deterioration in symptoms, function, and sports activities. Number of items: 18 subscales:
Response options vary for each item. Item 6 dichotomizes response into yes/no; items 1, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 use 5-point Likert scales; and items 2, 3, and 10 use 11-point numerical rating scales. The total score is calculated as (sum of items)/(maximum possible score) × 100. Possible score range 0-100, where 100 = no limitation with daily or sporting activities and the absence of symptoms. Higher values represent a better outcome. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Andri MT Lubis, MD, PhD | Indonesia University | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16603564 | Background | Biau DJ, Tournoux C, Katsahian S, Schranz PJ, Nizard RS. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts versus hamstring autografts for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2006 Apr 29;332(7548):995-1001. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38784.384109.2F. Epub 2006 Apr 7. | |
| 20660401 | Background | Frobell RB, Roos EM, Roos HP, Ranstam J, Lohmander LS. A randomized trial of treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tears. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 22;363(4):331-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907797. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 1, 2013 |
Not provided
A prospective cohort study design was used. Between March 2013 and March 2014, 12 patients underwent implantless ACL reconstruction using press-fit femoral technique, while 24 patients underwent implant ACL reconstruction. Objective functional outcome were measured using rolimeter, and subjective functional outcome were measured according to IKDC, Tegner-Lysholm and KOOS.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction | Procedure | Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with implant (using hamstring autograft fixed with bioscrew and endo-button) |
|
| Hamstring tendon autograft + implant fixation | Device | Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with implant (using hamstring tendon autograft fixed with bioscrew and endo-button) |
|
| At 3 months after surgery. |
| Functional outcome score International Knee Documentation committee (IKDC) | International Knee Documentation committee (IKDC) score evaluate improvement or deterioration in symptoms, function, and sports activities. Number of items: 18 subscales:
Response options vary for each item. Item 6 dichotomizes response into yes/no; items 1, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 use 5-point Likert scales; and items 2, 3, and 10 use 11-point numerical rating scales. The total score is calculated as (sum of items)/(maximum possible score) × 100. Possible score range 0-100, where 100 = no limitation with daily or sporting activities and the absence of symptoms. Higher values represent a better outcome. | At 6 months after surgery. |
| Functional outcome score Tegner-Lysholm | Tegner-Lysholm Score subjectively evaluate to how the knee pain has affected the ability to manage in everyday life. Number of items: 8 items, each scored differently Subscales:
Total score is given as "excellent" for 95 to 100 points; "good" for 84 to 94 points, "fair" for 65 to 83 points, or "poor" for less than 65 points. | At 1 month after surgery. |
| Functional outcome scores Tegner-Lysholm | Tegner-Lysholm Score subjectively evaluate to how the knee pain has affected the ability to manage in everyday life. Number of items: 8 items, each scored differently Subscales:
Total score is given as "excellent" for 95 to 100 points; "good" for 84 to 94 points, "fair" for 65 to 83 points, or "poor" for less than 65 points. | At 3 months after surgery. |
| Functional outcome scores Tegner-Lysholm | Tegner-Lysholm Score subjectively evaluate to how the knee pain has affected the ability to manage in everyday life. Number of items: 8 items, each scored differently Subscales:
Total score is given as "excellent" for 95 to 100 points; "good" for 84 to 94 points, "fair" for 65 to 83 points, or "poor" for less than 65 points. | At 6 months after surgery. |
| Functional outcome score Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) | Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) measure patients' opinions about their knee and associated problems over short- and long-term followup (1 week to decades). Number of items: 42 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4) across 5 subscales:
The 5 dimensions are scored separately as the sum of all corresponding items, and then converted into percentage (score range 0-100). Score of 0 means extreme knee problems and score of 100 means no knee problems. | At 1 month after surgery. |
| Functional outcome score Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) | Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) measure patients' opinions about their knee and associated problems over short- and long-term followup (1 week to decades). Number of items: 42 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4) across 5 subscales:
The 5 dimensions are scored separately as the sum of all corresponding items, and then converted into percentage (score range 0-100). Score of 0 means extreme knee problems and score of 100 means no knee problems. | At 3 months after surgery. |
| Functional outcome score Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) | Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) measure patients' opinions about their knee and associated problems over short- and long-term followup (1 week to decades). Number of items: 42 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4) across 5 subscales:
The 5 dimensions are scored separately as the sum of all corresponding items, and then converted into percentage (score range 0-100). Score of 0 means extreme knee problems and score of 100 means no knee problems. | At 6 months after surgery. |
| 21181226 | Background | Romanini E, D'Angelo F, De Masi S, Adriani E, Magaletti M, Lacorte E, Laricchiuta P, Sagliocca L, Morciano C, Mele A. Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Traumatol. 2010 Dec;11(4):211-9. doi: 10.1007/s10195-010-0124-9. Epub 2010 Dec 23. |
| 1529133 | Background | Remer EM, Fitzgerald SW, Friedman H, Rogers LF, Hendrix RW, Schafer MF. Anterior cruciate ligament injury: MR imaging diagnosis and patterns of injury. Radiographics. 1992 Sep;12(5):901-15. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.12.5.1529133. |
| 21908962 | Background | Tirmik U, Mahirogullari M, Kuskucu M. The results of reconstruction of the ACL using the cross-pin femoral system and four-strand hamstring tendon autografts. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2011;45(4):233-9. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2011.2309. |
| 24286412 | Background | Mei Y, Ao YF, Wang JQ, Ma Y, Zhang X, Wang JN, Zhu JX. Clinical characteristics of 4355 patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013 Dec;126(23):4487-92. |
| 29284176 | Background | Taketomi S, Inui H, Yamagami R, Shirakawa N, Kawaguchi K, Nakagawa T, Tanaka S. Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft for Anatomical Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Three-Dimensional Validation of Femoral and Tibial Tunnel Positions. J Knee Surg. 2018 Oct;31(9):866-874. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1615813. Epub 2017 Dec 28. |
| 16210575 | Background | Pavlik A, Hidas P, Tallay A, Toman J, Berkes I. Femoral press-fit fixation technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone graft: a prospective clinical evaluation of 285 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Feb;34(2):220-5. doi: 10.1177/0363546505279920. Epub 2005 Oct 6. |
| 22074619 | Background | Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. Treatment of meniscus tears during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2012 Jan;28(1):123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.08.292. Epub 2011 Nov 9. |
| 22738187 | Background | Widuchowski W, Widuchowska M, Koczy B, Dragan S, Czamara A, Tomaszewski W, Widuchowski J. Femoral press-fit fixation in ACL reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: results at 15 years follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Jun 27;13:115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-115. |
| 21663722 | Background | Wipfler B, Donner S, Zechmann CM, Springer J, Siebold R, Paessler HH. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon: a prospective comparative study with 9-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2011 May;27(5):653-65. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.01.015. |
| Oct 3, 2019 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Mar 1, 2013 | Oct 3, 2019 | ICF_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000070598 | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries |
| D012421 | Rupture |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007718 | Knee Injuries |
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided